The Bank of Nova Scotia
The Bank of Nova Scotia BNS.TO Peers
See (BNS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS.TO | CA$73.78 | -0.16% | 91.9B | 15.47 | CA$4.77 | +5.74% |
| JPM.NE | CA$34.78 | -1.22% | 1T | 12.74 | CA$2.73 | +3.65% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$22.64 | -1.14% | 457.7B | 13.01 | CA$1.74 | +3.22% |
| RY.TO | CA$173.57 | -0.97% | 244.8B | 13.81 | CA$12.57 | +3.34% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +3.34% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +4.31% |
| TD.TO | CA$96.23 | -0.08% | 168.6B | 9.90 | CA$9.72 | +4.31% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.14 | -0.34% | 165.3B | 3.25 | CA$8.05 | +4.31% |
| TD-PFL.TO | CA$24.99 | -0.04% | 135.5B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +4.31% |
| BMO.TO | CA$145.28 | -1.57% | 104.9B | 13.49 | CA$10.77 | +4.31% |
Stock Comparison
BNS.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while JPM.NE trades at CA$34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 457.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs RY.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 244.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while RY.TO trades at CA$173.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while TD.TO trades at CA$96.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 165.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while BMO.TO trades at CA$145.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs CM.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while CM.TO trades at CA$92.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs NA.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while NA.TO trades at CA$135.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 91.9B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$73.78, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.