The Bank of Nova Scotia
The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS.TO | CA$76.66 | -0.56% | 95.3B | 16.04 | CA$4.77 | +7.13% |
| JPM.NE | CA$37.61 | -2.74% | 1.1T | 14.37 | CA$2.63 | +2.57% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$23.12 | -4.42% | 468.6B | 13.01 | CA$1.80 | +2.30% |
| RY.TO | CA$179.09 | +0.73% | 250.3B | 14.12 | CA$12.57 | +3.34% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +3.34% |
| TD.TO | CA$100.51 | -0.41% | 175.3B | 10.38 | CA$9.64 | +4.17% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +4.17% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.53 | +0.04% | 166.6B | 3.27 | CA$8.05 | +4.17% |
| TD-PFL.TO | CA$24.99 | -0.04% | 135.5B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +4.17% |
| BMO.TO | CA$153.49 | +0.36% | 110.4B | 14.20 | CA$10.77 | +4.55% |
Stock Comparison
BNS.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while JPM.NE trades at CA$37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
BNS.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 468.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
BNS.TO vs RY.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 250.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while RY.TO trades at CA$179.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while TD.TO trades at CA$100.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while BMO.TO trades at CA$153.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BMO.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while CM.TO trades at CA$99.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while NA.TO trades at CA$144.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA-PE.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison August 2025
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 95.3B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$76.66, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here