The Bank of Nova Scotia
The Bank of Nova Scotia BNS.TO Peers
See (BNS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS.TO | $70.64 | -0.14% | 87.98B | 14.56 | $4.85 | +6.02% |
| JPM.NE | $34.60 | +1.41% | 1.03T | 12.67 | $2.73 | +3.77% |
| BOFA.NE | $22.81 | +2.24% | 467.07B | 12.96 | $1.76 | +3.23% |
| RY.TO | $169.78 | +0.46% | 239.82B | 13.80 | $12.30 | +3.42% |
| RY-PZ.TO | $25.00 | +0.04% | 208.62B | 2.19 | $11.44 | +3.42% |
| TD-PFK.TO | $24.97 | -0.10% | 171.27B | 3.10 | $8.05 | +4.65% |
| TD-PFI.TO | $25.58 | +0.08% | 161.77B | 3.18 | $8.05 | +4.65% |
| TD.TO | $89.13 | +0.69% | 156.13B | 18.88 | $4.72 | +4.65% |
| TD-PFL.TO | $24.99 | -0.04% | 135.46B | 3.10 | $8.05 | +4.65% |
| BMO.TO | $141.91 | +0.01% | 103.42B | 13.38 | $10.61 | +4.43% |
Stock Comparison
BNS.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.03T. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while JPM.NE trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 467.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while BOFA.NE trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs RY.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 239.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while RY.TO trades at $169.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while RY-PZ.TO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while TD-PFK.TO trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 161.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while TD-PFI.TO trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 156.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while TD.TO trades at $89.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while TD-PFL.TO trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 103.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while BMO.TO trades at $141.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs CM.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 84.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while CM.TO trades at $90.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs NA.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 49.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while NA.TO trades at $126.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while NA-PE.TO trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while NA-PC.TO trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.
BNS.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 87.98B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at $70.64, while CM-PT.TO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.56, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.