The Bank of Nova Scotia
The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS.TO | CA$93.80 | -1.28% | 116.3B | 13.96 | CA$6.74 | +4.63% |
| JPM.NE | CA$36.67 | -2.32% | 1T | 13.53 | CA$2.70 | +2.05% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$23.92 | -2.92% | 458.8B | 12.46 | CA$1.92 | +2.32% |
| RY.TO | CA$219.78 | -1.00% | 306.9B | 15.09 | CA$14.56 | +2.82% |
| TD.TO | CA$127.44 | -0.95% | 211.7B | 10.27 | CA$12.35 | +3.34% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +2.82% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +3.34% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.33 | +0.23% | 166B | 3.26 | CA$8.05 | +3.34% |
| TD-PFL.TO | CA$24.99 | -0.04% | 135.5B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +3.34% |
| BMO.TO | CA$183.08 | -0.26% | 129.2B | 15.26 | CA$11.99 | +3.58% |
Stock Comparison
BNS.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while JPM.NE trades at CA$36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
BNS.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 458.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
BNS.TO vs RY.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 306.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while RY.TO trades at CA$219.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 211.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while TD.TO trades at CA$127.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while BMO.TO trades at CA$183.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BMO.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while CM.TO trades at CA$127.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while NA.TO trades at CA$175.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA-PE.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison April 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 116.3B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$93.80, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.96, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here