Bluspring Enterprises Ltd.
Bluspring Enterprises Ltd. (BLUSPRING.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BLUSPRING.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLUSPRING.NS | ₹55.15 | -3.60% | 8.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SUNDARMHLD.NS | ₹684.25 | +0.00% | 152B | 33.12 | ₹20.66 | +0.23% |
| BLS.NS | ₹286.15 | +1.56% | 117.8B | 18.32 | ₹15.62 | +1.05% |
| BLS.BO | ₹285.95 | +0.86% | 117.7B | 19.59 | ₹14.60 | +1.05% |
| CMSINFO.BO | ₹310.35 | -1.44% | 51B | 16.04 | ₹19.35 | +2.90% |
| CMSINFO.NS | ₹310.20 | -1.48% | 51B | 16.04 | ₹19.34 | +2.90% |
| PDSL.NS | ₹309.95 | +0.76% | 43.8B | 40.73 | ₹7.61 | +1.08% |
| PDSL.BO | ₹309.15 | +0.34% | 43.7B | 40.68 | ₹7.60 | +1.08% |
| SEIL.BO | ₹190.90 | +7.34% | 30.7B | 707.04 | ₹0.27 | N/A |
| JAYKAY.BO | ₹150.70 | -0.76% | 19.6B | 65.52 | ₹2.30 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BLUSPRING.NS vs SUNDARMHLD.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUNDARMHLD.NS has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SUNDARMHLD.NS trades at ₹684.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNDARMHLD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SUNDARMHLD.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs BLS.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BLS.NS has a market cap of 117.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while BLS.NS trades at ₹286.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BLS.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to BLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check BLS.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs BLS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BLS.BO has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while BLS.BO trades at ₹285.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BLS.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to BLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check BLS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs CMSINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CMSINFO.BO has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while CMSINFO.BO trades at ₹310.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMSINFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to CMSINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check CMSINFO.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs CMSINFO.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CMSINFO.NS has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while CMSINFO.NS trades at ₹310.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMSINFO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to CMSINFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check CMSINFO.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PDSL.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PDSL.NS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PDSL.NS trades at ₹309.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.73. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PDSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to PDSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PDSL.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PDSL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PDSL.BO has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PDSL.BO trades at ₹309.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDSL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PDSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to PDSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PDSL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SEIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SEIL.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SEIL.BO trades at ₹190.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 707.04. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SEIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SEIL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs JAYKAY.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JAYKAY.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while JAYKAY.BO trades at ₹150.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAYKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 65.52. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JAYKAY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to JAYKAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check JAYKAY.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs HGS.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HGS.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while HGS.NS trades at ₹381.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGS.NS's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HGS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to HGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check HGS.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs HGS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HGS.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while HGS.BO trades at ₹380.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGS.BO's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HGS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to HGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check HGS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ALLSEC.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALLSEC.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ALLSEC.NS trades at ₹1,084.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ALLSEC.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ALLSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALLSEC.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ALLSEC.BO trades at ₹1,080.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ALLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ALLSEC.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs BLIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BLIL.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while BLIL.BO trades at ₹72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BLIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to BLIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check BLIL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs BLSE.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BLSE.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while BLSE.NS trades at ₹158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLSE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BLSE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to BLSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check BLSE.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ALLDIGI.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALLDIGI.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ALLDIGI.BO trades at ₹827.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALLDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ALLDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ALLDIGI.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ONEPOINT.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ONEPOINT.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ONEPOINT.NS trades at ₹47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ONEPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ONEPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ONEPOINT.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ALLDIGI.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALLDIGI.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ALLDIGI.NS trades at ₹827.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLDIGI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALLDIGI.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ALLDIGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ALLDIGI.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs UDS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, UDS.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while UDS.BO trades at ₹154.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UDS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to UDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check UDS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs UDS.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, UDS.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while UDS.NS trades at ₹154.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UDS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to UDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check UDS.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ASTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ASTAR.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ASTAR.BO trades at ₹637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ASTAR.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs GKWLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GKWLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while GKWLIMITED.NS trades at ₹1,667.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKWLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 139.51. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GKWLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to GKWLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check GKWLIMITED.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs KAPSTON.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KAPSTON.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while KAPSTON.NS trades at ₹394.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAPSTON.NS's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KAPSTON.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to KAPSTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check KAPSTON.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs EXHICON.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, EXHICON.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while EXHICON.BO trades at ₹549.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXHICON.BO's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EXHICON.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to EXHICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check EXHICON.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs MADHUVEER.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MADHUVEER.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while MADHUVEER.BO trades at ₹255.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MADHUVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 730.71. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MADHUVEER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to MADHUVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check MADHUVEER.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs REPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, REPRO.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while REPRO.NS trades at ₹400.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REPRO.NS's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REPRO.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to REPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check REPRO.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs REPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, REPRO.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while REPRO.BO trades at ₹399.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REPRO.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to REPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check REPRO.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ONEGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ONEGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ONEGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹676.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ONEGLOBAL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RADIANTCMS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RADIANTCMS.BO trades at ₹37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADIANTCMS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RADIANTCMS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RADIANTCMS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RADIANTCMS.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RADIANTCMS.NS trades at ₹37.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADIANTCMS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RADIANTCMS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RADIANTCMS.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs LIKHAMI.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LIKHAMI.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while LIKHAMI.BO trades at ₹351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIKHAMI.BO's P/E ratio is 1753.86. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LIKHAMI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to LIKHAMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check LIKHAMI.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs MAJESAUT.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MAJESAUT.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while MAJESAUT.BO trades at ₹321.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAJESAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MAJESAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to MAJESAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check MAJESAUT.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs DJML.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DJML.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while DJML.NS trades at ₹92.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJML.NS's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DJML.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to DJML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check DJML.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs DJML.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DJML.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while DJML.BO trades at ₹92.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJML.BO's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DJML.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to DJML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check DJML.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs 531216.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, 531216.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while 531216.BO trades at ₹12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 531216.BO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 531216.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to 531216.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check 531216.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ALPHALOGIC.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALPHALOGIC.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ALPHALOGIC.BO trades at ₹41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPHALOGIC.BO's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ALPHALOGIC.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs COMFINTE.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, COMFINTE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while COMFINTE.BO trades at ₹7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMFINTE.BO's P/E ratio is -67.91. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COMFINTE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to COMFINTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check COMFINTE.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RUCHINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RUCHINFRA.BO trades at ₹5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUCHINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUCHINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RUCHINFRA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RUCHINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RUCHINFRA.NS trades at ₹5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUCHINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUCHINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RUCHINFRA.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SUPRAPFSL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUPRAPFSL.BO has a market cap of 933.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SUPRAPFSL.BO trades at ₹28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUPRAPFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SUPRAPFSL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs TECHKGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TECHKGREEN.BO has a market cap of 897M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while TECHKGREEN.BO trades at ₹121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECHKGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TECHKGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to TECHKGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check TECHKGREEN.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ISTRNETWK.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ISTRNETWK.BO has a market cap of 818.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ISTRNETWK.BO trades at ₹38.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISTRNETWK.BO's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ISTRNETWK.BO's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ISTRNETWK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ISTRNETWK.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RIDDHICORP.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RIDDHICORP.BO has a market cap of 745.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RIDDHICORP.BO trades at ₹62.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDDHICORP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RIDDHICORP.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to RIDDHICORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RIDDHICORP.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs VIVIDM.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VIVIDM.BO has a market cap of 721.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while VIVIDM.BO trades at ₹7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIVIDM.BO's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VIVIDM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to VIVIDM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check VIVIDM.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs CHOKSILA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CHOKSILA.BO has a market cap of 721.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while CHOKSILA.BO trades at ₹103.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHOKSILA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHOKSILA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to CHOKSILA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check CHOKSILA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ACCELERATE.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ACCELERATE.BO has a market cap of 665.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ACCELERATE.BO trades at ₹193.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCELERATE.BO's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACCELERATE.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELERATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ACCELERATE.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs TRESCON.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TRESCON.BO has a market cap of 611.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while TRESCON.BO trades at ₹8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRESCON.BO's P/E ratio is 49.59. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRESCON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to TRESCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check TRESCON.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SHARIKA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SHARIKA.BO has a market cap of 517.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SHARIKA.BO trades at ₹11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHARIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHARIKA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to SHARIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SHARIKA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RITHWIKFMS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RITHWIKFMS.BO has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RITHWIKFMS.BO trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITHWIKFMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RITHWIKFMS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs HILIKS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HILIKS.BO has a market cap of 464.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while HILIKS.BO trades at ₹43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HILIKS.BO's P/E ratio is 93.91. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HILIKS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to HILIKS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check HILIKS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PROMAX.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PROMAX.BO has a market cap of 432.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PROMAX.BO trades at ₹17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PROMAX.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to PROMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PROMAX.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SUGALDAM.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUGALDAM.BO has a market cap of 430.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SUGALDAM.BO trades at ₹68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUGALDAM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUGALDAM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SUGALDAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SUGALDAM.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs FUTSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, FUTSOL.BO has a market cap of 429.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while FUTSOL.BO trades at ₹41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.11. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FUTSOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to FUTSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check FUTSOL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs JTAPARIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JTAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while JTAPARIA.BO trades at ₹23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JTAPARIA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to JTAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check JTAPARIA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs VKAL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VKAL.BO has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while VKAL.BO trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VKAL.BO's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VKAL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to VKAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check VKAL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs WALCHPF.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, WALCHPF.BO has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while WALCHPF.BO trades at ₹115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WALCHPF.BO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WALCHPF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to WALCHPF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check WALCHPF.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PADAMCO.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PADAMCO.BO has a market cap of 322.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PADAMCO.BO trades at ₹2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PADAMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PADAMCO.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to PADAMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PADAMCO.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PREMCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PREMCAP.BO has a market cap of 320.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PREMCAP.BO trades at ₹9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -144.33. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PREMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to PREMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PREMCAP.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs MADHUSE.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MADHUSE.BO has a market cap of 314.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while MADHUSE.BO trades at ₹20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MADHUSE.BO's P/E ratio is -34.49. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MADHUSE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to MADHUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check MADHUSE.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SUJALA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUJALA.BO has a market cap of 310.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SUJALA.BO trades at ₹54.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUJALA.BO's P/E ratio is -76.46. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUJALA.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SUJALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SUJALA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs LIBORDFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LIBORDFIN.BO has a market cap of 289.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while LIBORDFIN.BO trades at ₹18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIBORDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.88. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LIBORDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to LIBORDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check LIBORDFIN.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PRISMX.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PRISMX.BO has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PRISMX.BO trades at ₹0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRISMX.BO's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRISMX.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to PRISMX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PRISMX.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SVS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SVS.BO has a market cap of 269.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SVS.BO trades at ₹12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVS.BO's P/E ratio is 252.80. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SVS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to SVS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SVS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs KAARYAFSL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KAARYAFSL.BO has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while KAARYAFSL.BO trades at ₹26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAARYAFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KAARYAFSL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to KAARYAFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check KAARYAFSL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs DECOMIC.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DECOMIC.BO has a market cap of 242.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while DECOMIC.BO trades at ₹57.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECOMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DECOMIC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to DECOMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check DECOMIC.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs UNICK.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, UNICK.BO has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while UNICK.BO trades at ₹43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNICK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UNICK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to UNICK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check UNICK.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RAJSPTR.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAJSPTR.BO has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RAJSPTR.BO trades at ₹14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAJSPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAJSPTR.BO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to RAJSPTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RAJSPTR.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SMARTFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SMARTFIN.BO has a market cap of 231.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SMARTFIN.BO trades at ₹7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMARTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMARTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SMARTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SMARTFIN.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs KACL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KACL.BO has a market cap of 226.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while KACL.BO trades at ₹4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KACL.BO's P/E ratio is -17.92. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KACL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to KACL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check KACL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs INLANPR.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, INLANPR.BO has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while INLANPR.BO trades at ₹43.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INLANPR.BO's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INLANPR.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to INLANPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check INLANPR.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs PROCLB.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PROCLB.BO has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while PROCLB.BO trades at ₹41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROCLB.BO's P/E ratio is -39.76. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PROCLB.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to PROCLB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check PROCLB.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs MPILCORPL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MPILCORPL.BO has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while MPILCORPL.BO trades at ₹358.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPILCORPL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MPILCORPL.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to MPILCORPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check MPILCORPL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ESHAMEDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ESHAMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ESHAMEDIA.BO trades at ₹24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESHAMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -19.56. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ESHAMEDIA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SBECSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SBECSYS.BO has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SBECSYS.BO trades at ₹16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBECSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SBECSYS.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SBECSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SBECSYS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs VISVEN.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VISVEN.BO has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while VISVEN.BO trades at ₹51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VISVEN.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to VISVEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check VISVEN.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs AMALGAM.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AMALGAM.BO has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while AMALGAM.BO trades at ₹55.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMALGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -78.76. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AMALGAM.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to AMALGAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check AMALGAM.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs KIRANPR.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KIRANPR.BO has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while KIRANPR.BO trades at ₹27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIRANPR.BO's P/E ratio is 155.50. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KIRANPR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to KIRANPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check KIRANPR.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs INNOKAIZ.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, INNOKAIZ.BO has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while INNOKAIZ.BO trades at ₹13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INNOKAIZ.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INNOKAIZ.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to INNOKAIZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check INNOKAIZ.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs HBEL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HBEL.BO has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while HBEL.BO trades at ₹21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBEL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HBEL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to HBEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check HBEL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SHANGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SHANGAR.BO has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SHANGAR.BO trades at ₹0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHANGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHANGAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SHANGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SHANGAR.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ASIAN.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ASIAN.BO has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ASIAN.BO trades at ₹36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIAN.BO's P/E ratio is 165.64. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASIAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ASIAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ASIAN.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ICSL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ICSL.BO has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ICSL.BO trades at ₹3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ICSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ICSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ICSL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs BNRUDY.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BNRUDY.BO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while BNRUDY.BO trades at ₹39.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRUDY.BO's P/E ratio is -28.78. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BNRUDY.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to BNRUDY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check BNRUDY.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs GLCL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GLCL.BO has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while GLCL.BO trades at ₹17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCL.BO's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLCL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to GLCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check GLCL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs VBDESAI.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VBDESAI.BO has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while VBDESAI.BO trades at ₹20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBDESAI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VBDESAI.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to VBDESAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check VBDESAI.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs MNPLFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MNPLFIN.BO has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while MNPLFIN.BO trades at ₹9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNPLFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNPLFIN.BO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to MNPLFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check MNPLFIN.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs GGPL.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GGPL.BO has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while GGPL.BO trades at ₹1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGPL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GGPL.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to GGPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check GGPL.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ATHARVENT.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ATHARVENT.BO has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ATHARVENT.BO trades at ₹3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHARVENT.BO's P/E ratio is 66.17. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATHARVENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to ATHARVENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ATHARVENT.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SECURCRED.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SECURCRED.BO has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SECURCRED.BO trades at ₹1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECURCRED.BO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SECURCRED.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to SECURCRED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SECURCRED.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SECURCRED.NS Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SECURCRED.NS has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SECURCRED.NS trades at ₹1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECURCRED.NS's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SECURCRED.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SECURCRED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SECURCRED.NS's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ASHRAM.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ASHRAM.BO has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ASHRAM.BO trades at ₹4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASHRAM.BO's P/E ratio is -55.22. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASHRAM.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to ASHRAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ASHRAM.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs JOINTECAED.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JOINTECAED.BO has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while JOINTECAED.BO trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOINTECAED.BO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JOINTECAED.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to JOINTECAED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check JOINTECAED.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RICHUNV.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RICHUNV.BO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RICHUNV.BO trades at ₹7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICHUNV.BO's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RICHUNV.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to RICHUNV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RICHUNV.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs NORTHLINK.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NORTHLINK.BO has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while NORTHLINK.BO trades at ₹15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NORTHLINK.BO's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NORTHLINK.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to NORTHLINK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check NORTHLINK.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SHIVA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SHIVA.BO has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SHIVA.BO trades at ₹7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIVA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHIVA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to SHIVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SHIVA.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs NAVODAYENT.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NAVODAYENT.BO has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while NAVODAYENT.BO trades at ₹5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVODAYENT.BO's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NAVODAYENT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is more volatile compared to NAVODAYENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check NAVODAYENT.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs ENCODE.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENCODE.BO has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while ENCODE.BO trades at ₹13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENCODE.BO's P/E ratio is -62.57. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENCODE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to ENCODE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check ENCODE.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs RAMASIGNS.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAMASIGNS.BO has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while RAMASIGNS.BO trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMASIGNS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAMASIGNS.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to RAMASIGNS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check RAMASIGNS.BO's competition here
BLUSPRING.NS vs SUUMAYA.BO Comparison February 2026
BLUSPRING.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLUSPRING.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUUMAYA.BO has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLUSPRING.NS is priced at ₹55.15, while SUUMAYA.BO trades at ₹1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLUSPRING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUUMAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLUSPRING.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUUMAYA.BO's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BLUSPRING.NS is less volatile compared to SUUMAYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLUSPRING.NS.Check SUUMAYA.BO's competition here