Blue Note Mining Inc.
Blue Note Mining Inc. (BLNMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BLNMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLNMF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 1.3M | N/A | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $28.50 | +13.65% | 144.6B | 12.72 | $2.24 | +4.35% |
| RTNTF | $74.83 | +0.09% | 107B | 12.09 | $6.28 | +3.10% |
| RTPPF | $61.88 | +0.39% | 105.2B | 9.85 | $6.28 | +6.50% |
| GMBXF | $6.97 | +6.25% | 54.3B | 13.94 | $0.50 | +3.47% |
| CYLYF | $0.00 | -99.99% | 49.7B | -0.79 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GLCNF | $4.00 | +2.56% | 47.4B | -24.97 | -$0.16 | +2.88% |
| GLNCY | $7.93 | +1.15% | 47.1B | -24.78 | -$0.32 | +2.71% |
| FSUGY | $25.67 | +1.93% | 39.5B | 10.15 | $2.53 | +7.05% |
| FSUMF | $12.80 | +5.78% | 39.4B | 10.24 | $1.25 | +6.91% |
Stock Comparison
BLNMF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 144.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while BHPLF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check BHPLF's competition here
BLNMF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while RTNTF trades at $74.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check RTNTF's competition here
BLNMF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while RTPPF trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
BLNMF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while GMBXF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check GMBXF's competition here
BLNMF vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CYLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and CYLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYLYF's competition here
BLNMF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while GLCNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check GLCNF's competition here
BLNMF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while GLNCY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.78. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check GLNCY's competition here
BLNMF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while FSUGY trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check FSUGY's competition here
BLNMF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while FSUMF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check FSUMF's competition here
BLNMF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AAUKF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAUKF's competition here
BLNMF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while NGLOY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check NGLOY's competition here
BLNMF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CMCLF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check CMCLF's competition here
BLNMF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCKRF's competition here
BLNMF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while IPOAF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPOAF's competition here
BLNMF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while IVPAF trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check IVPAF's competition here
BLNMF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while BDNNY trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check BDNNY's competition here
BLNMF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
BLNMF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and JXMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JXMNF's competition here
BLNMF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SHTLF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
BLNMF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while LYSDY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 218.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check LYSDY's competition here
BLNMF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while LYSCF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 217.13. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check LYSCF's competition here
BLNMF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SMMYY trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 62.70. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check SMMYY's competition here
BLNMF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ABML's competition here
BLNMF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
BLNMF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PUTKY trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check PUTKY's competition here
BLNMF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
BLNMF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PILBF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check PILBF's competition here
BLNMF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MALRY trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check MALRY's competition here
BLNMF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
BLNMF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MALRF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check MALRF's competition here
BLNMF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
BLNMF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while NGXXF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -58.14. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check NGXXF's competition here
BLNMF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check FLMMF's competition here
BLNMF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
BLNMF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
BLNMF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while IIDDY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check IIDDY's competition here
BLNMF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
BLNMF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
BLNMF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
BLNMF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
BLNMF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
BLNMF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFBOF's competition here
BLNMF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SOUHY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.23. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check SOUHY's competition here
BLNMF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ERMAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
BLNMF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ILKAY trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ILKAY's competition here
BLNMF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ILKAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ILKAF's competition here
BLNMF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAF's competition here
BLNMF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDF's competition here
BLNMF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETRF's competition here
BLNMF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAOFF's competition here
BLNMF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while LINRF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check LINRF's competition here
BLNMF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ADMLF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ADMLF's competition here
BLNMF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTLF's competition here
BLNMF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and NCKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCKAF's competition here
BLNMF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
BLNMF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and MFRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MFRVF's competition here
BLNMF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while FMCXF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check FMCXF's competition here
BLNMF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 995.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AFMJF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check AFMJF's competition here
BLNMF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 984.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ATUSF trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ATUSF's competition here
BLNMF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and STTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STTSY's competition here
BLNMF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 916.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AMVMF trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMVMF's competition here
BLNMF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
BLNMF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ALMTF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ALMTF's competition here
BLNMF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 776M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMFF's competition here
BLNMF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and BIRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIRNF's competition here
BLNMF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 624.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while REEMF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check REEMF's competition here
BLNMF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and CTJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHF's competition here
BLNMF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while VULNF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check VULNF's competition here
BLNMF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 553.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MJDLF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check MJDLF's competition here
BLNMF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CREQF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and CREQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CREQF's competition here
BLNMF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 512.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PMETF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -105.23. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check PMETF's competition here
BLNMF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 510.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check SLGGF's competition here
BLNMF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and TTNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTNNF's competition here
BLNMF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while BQSSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check BQSSF's competition here
BLNMF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and PTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTMF's competition here
BLNMF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and OSTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSTTF's competition here
BLNMF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -92.42. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check FGOVF's competition here
BLNMF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check MCRZF's competition here
BLNMF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 450.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXMF's competition here
BLNMF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 408.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CGMLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGMLF's competition here
BLNMF vs LLLAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 393.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while LLLAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and LLLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLLAF's competition here
BLNMF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
BLNMF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while KMRPF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check KMRPF's competition here
BLNMF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check MLYF's competition here
BLNMF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while FWEDF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check FWEDF's competition here
BLNMF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHY's competition here
BLNMF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 347.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MLXEF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check MLXEF's competition here
BLNMF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ARAFF's competition here
BLNMF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SRHYY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check SRHYY's competition here
BLNMF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
BLNMF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SVMLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check SVMLF's competition here
BLNMF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check ERLFF's competition here
BLNMF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
BLNMF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while PRMNF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -20.22. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check PRMNF's competition here
BLNMF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and RTLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTLGF's competition here
BLNMF vs SYAAF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 285.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while SYAAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check SYAAF's competition here
BLNMF vs TLOFF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while TLOFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check TLOFF's competition here
BLNMF vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while MMILF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMILF's competition here
BLNMF vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
BLNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLNMF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLNMF is priced at $0.00, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLNMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BLNMF's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BLNMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLNMF.Check LRSRF's competition here