Black Hills Corporation

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SRE has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while SRE trades at $95.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas SRE's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to SRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SRE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ELP has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while ELP trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas ELP's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to ELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check ELP's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BIP has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while BIP trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas BIP's P/E ratio is 43.39. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to BIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check BIP's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while AES trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check AES's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check AESC's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while CIG-C trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check CIG-C's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BIP-PA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while BIP-PA trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas BIP-PA's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIP-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to BIP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check BIP-PA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BIP-PB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while BIP-PB trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas BIP-PB's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIP-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to BIP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check BIP-PB's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while CIG trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to CIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check CIG's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AQNA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while AQNA trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas AQNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AQNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to AQNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check AQNA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SJI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while SJI trades at $36.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas SJI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to SJI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SJI's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while NWE trades at $69.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to NWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check NWE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while ALE trades at $67.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas ALE's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to ALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check ALE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while OTTR trades at $85.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check OTTR's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while AVA trades at $39.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas AVA's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to AVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check AVA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while MGEE trades at $82.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check MGEE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while HE trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to HE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check HE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while ELPC trades at $11.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check ELPC's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UTL has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while UTL trades at $51.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas UTL's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to UTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check UTL's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MNTK has a market cap of 219.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.83, while MNTK trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 18.52, whereas MNTK's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNTK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to MNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check MNTK's competition here