Montauk Renewables, Inc.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNTK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNTK | $1.54 | +12.41% | 219.2M | 154.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| SRE | $94.37 | -0.01% | 61.6B | 34.31 | $2.75 | +2.73% |
| ELP | $9.27 | -6.27% | 27.5B | 18.18 | $0.51 | +4.72% |
| BIP | $36.28 | +1.54% | 16.8B | 54.98 | $0.66 | +4.81% |
| AESC | $62.61 | +1.07% | 11.2B | -280.76 | -$0.22 | +10.98% |
| AES | $14.37 | +0.63% | 10.2B | 10.97 | $1.31 | +4.90% |
| CIG-C | $3.35 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 9.71 | $0.35 | +8.53% |
| BIP-PA | $16.91 | -0.24% | 7.8B | 14.34 | $1.18 | +4.81% |
| BIP-PB | $16.32 | +0.55% | 7.5B | 13.84 | $1.18 | +4.81% |
| CIG | $2.47 | +0.41% | 7.1B | 7.09 | $0.35 | +11.03% |
Stock Comparison
MNTK vs SRE Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, SRE has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while SRE trades at $94.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas SRE's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to SRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check SRE's competition here
MNTK vs ELP Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, ELP has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while ELP trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas ELP's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to ELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check ELP's competition here
MNTK vs BIP Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, BIP has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while BIP trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas BIP's P/E ratio is 54.98. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to BIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check BIP's competition here
MNTK vs AESC Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while AESC trades at $62.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check AESC's competition here
MNTK vs AES Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while AES trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check AES's competition here
MNTK vs CIG-C Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while CIG-C trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check CIG-C's competition here
MNTK vs BIP-PA Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, BIP-PA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while BIP-PA trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas BIP-PA's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIP-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to BIP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check BIP-PA's competition here
MNTK vs BIP-PB Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, BIP-PB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while BIP-PB trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas BIP-PB's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIP-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to BIP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check BIP-PB's competition here
MNTK vs CIG Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while CIG trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to CIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check CIG's competition here
MNTK vs BKH Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, BKH has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while BKH trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas BKH's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to BKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check BKH's competition here
MNTK vs AQNA Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, AQNA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while AQNA trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas AQNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AQNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to AQNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check AQNA's competition here
MNTK vs SJI Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, SJI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while SJI trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas SJI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SJI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to SJI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check SJI's competition here
MNTK vs NWE Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while NWE trades at $70.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to NWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check NWE's competition here
MNTK vs ALE Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, ALE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while ALE trades at $67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas ALE's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to ALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check ALE's competition here
MNTK vs OTTR Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while OTTR trades at $88.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check OTTR's competition here
MNTK vs AVA Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, AVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while AVA trades at $40.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas AVA's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to AVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check AVA's competition here
MNTK vs MGEE Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while MGEE trades at $80.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check MGEE's competition here
MNTK vs HE Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while HE trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to HE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check HE's competition here
MNTK vs ELPC Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while ELPC trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check ELPC's competition here
MNTK vs UTL Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, UTL has a market cap of 908.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while UTL trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas UTL's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to UTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check UTL's competition here
MNTK vs SJIV Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, SJIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while SJIV trades at $67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas SJIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SJIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to SJIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check SJIV's competition here
MNTK vs SJIJ Comparison May 2026
MNTK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNTK stands at 219.2M. In comparison, SJIJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNTK is priced at $1.54, while SJIJ trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNTK currently has a P/E ratio of 154.00, whereas SJIJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNTK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SJIJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNTK is more volatile compared to SJIJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNTK.Check SJIJ's competition here