Algonquin Power & Utilities Cor
Algonquin Power & Utilities Cor (AQNA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AQNA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQNA | $25.10 | -0.12% | 4.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.85% |
| SRE | $94.67 | -0.47% | 61.9B | 34.43 | $2.75 | +2.73% |
| ELP | $9.27 | -6.27% | 27.5B | 18.18 | $0.51 | +4.72% |
| BIP | $36.18 | +0.92% | 16.7B | 54.85 | $0.66 | +4.82% |
| AESC | $62.61 | +1.07% | 11.2B | -280.76 | -$0.22 | +10.98% |
| AES | $14.28 | -1.18% | 10.2B | 10.91 | $1.31 | +4.93% |
| CIG-C | $3.27 | -3.82% | 9.4B | 9.34 | $0.35 | +8.63% |
| BIP-PA | $17.05 | +0.35% | 7.9B | 14.46 | $1.18 | +4.82% |
| BIP-PB | $16.39 | +0.86% | 7.6B | 13.90 | $1.18 | +4.82% |
| CIG | $2.50 | -0.79% | 7.2B | 7.16 | $0.35 | +10.92% |
Stock Comparison
AQNA vs SRE Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SRE has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SRE trades at $94.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRE's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to SRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SRE's competition here
AQNA vs ELP Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELP has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while ELP trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELP's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to ELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check ELP's competition here
AQNA vs BIP Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIP has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BIP trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIP's P/E ratio is 54.85. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BIP's competition here
AQNA vs AESC Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while AESC trades at $62.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check AESC's competition here
AQNA vs AES Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while AES trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check AES's competition here
AQNA vs CIG-C Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while CIG-C trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check CIG-C's competition here
AQNA vs BIP-PA Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIP-PA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BIP-PA trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIP-PA's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIP-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BIP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BIP-PA's competition here
AQNA vs BIP-PB Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIP-PB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BIP-PB trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIP-PB's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIP-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BIP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BIP-PB's competition here
AQNA vs CIG Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while CIG trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to CIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check CIG's competition here
AQNA vs BKH Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BKH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BKH trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKH's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BKH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BKH's competition here
AQNA vs NWE Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while NWE trades at $72.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to NWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check NWE's competition here
AQNA vs SJI Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SJI trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SJI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is more volatile compared to SJI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SJI's competition here
AQNA vs ALE Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ALE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while ALE trades at $67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALE's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to ALE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check ALE's competition here
AQNA vs OTTR Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while OTTR trades at $90.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check OTTR's competition here
AQNA vs AVA Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while AVA trades at $40.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVA's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to AVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check AVA's competition here
AQNA vs MGEE Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while MGEE trades at $80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check MGEE's competition here
AQNA vs HE Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while HE trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to HE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check HE's competition here
AQNA vs ELPC Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while ELPC trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check ELPC's competition here
AQNA vs UTL Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, UTL has a market cap of 932.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while UTL trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTL's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to UTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check UTL's competition here
AQNA vs MNTK Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MNTK has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while MNTK trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTK's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNTK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to MNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check MNTK's competition here
AQNA vs SJIV Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SJIV trades at $67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SJIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to SJIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SJIV's competition here
AQNA vs SJIJ Comparison May 2026
AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJIJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SJIJ trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJIJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SJIJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to SJIJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SJIJ's competition here