BHP Group Limited
BHP Group Limited (BHPLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BHPLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHPLF | $28.50 | +13.65% | 144.6B | 12.72 | $2.24 | +4.35% |
| RTNTF | $74.83 | +0.09% | 107B | 12.09 | $6.28 | +3.10% |
| RTPPF | $61.88 | +0.39% | 105.2B | 9.85 | $6.28 | +6.50% |
| GMBXF | $6.97 | +6.25% | 54.3B | 13.94 | $0.50 | +3.47% |
| CYLYF | $0.00 | -99.99% | 49.7B | -0.79 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GLCNF | $4.00 | +2.56% | 47.4B | -24.97 | -$0.16 | +2.88% |
| GLNCY | $7.93 | +1.15% | 47.1B | -24.78 | -$0.32 | +2.71% |
| FSUGY | $25.67 | +1.93% | 39.5B | 10.15 | $2.53 | +7.05% |
| FSUMF | $12.80 | +5.78% | 39.4B | 10.24 | $1.25 | +6.91% |
| AAUKF | $27.18 | -7.86% | 31.8B | -10.28 | -$2.87 | +2.27% |
Stock Comparison
BHPLF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while RTNTF trades at $74.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check RTNTF's competition here
BHPLF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while RTPPF trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check RTPPF's competition here
BHPLF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while GMBXF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check GMBXF's competition here
BHPLF vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CYLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CYLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CYLYF's competition here
BHPLF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while GLCNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check GLCNF's competition here
BHPLF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while GLNCY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.78. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check GLNCY's competition here
BHPLF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while FSUGY trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check FSUGY's competition here
BHPLF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while FSUMF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check FSUMF's competition here
BHPLF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AAUKF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AAUKF's competition here
BHPLF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while NGLOY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check NGLOY's competition here
BHPLF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CMCLF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CMCLF's competition here
BHPLF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check TCKRF's competition here
BHPLF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while IPOAF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check IPOAF's competition here
BHPLF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while IVPAF trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check IVPAF's competition here
BHPLF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while BDNNY trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check BDNNY's competition here
BHPLF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check BOLIF's competition here
BHPLF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check JXMNF's competition here
BHPLF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SHTLF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SHTLF's competition here
BHPLF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while LYSDY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 218.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check LYSDY's competition here
BHPLF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while LYSCF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 217.13. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check LYSCF's competition here
BHPLF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SMMYY trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 62.70. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SMMYY's competition here
BHPLF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ABML's competition here
BHPLF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check STMNF's competition here
BHPLF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PUTKY trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PUTKY's competition here
BHPLF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PUTKF's competition here
BHPLF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PILBF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PILBF's competition here
BHPLF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MALRY trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MALRY's competition here
BHPLF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check NILSY's competition here
BHPLF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MALRF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MALRF's competition here
BHPLF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PAEKY's competition here
BHPLF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while NGXXF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -58.14. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check NGXXF's competition here
BHPLF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check FLMMF's competition here
BHPLF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check IPGDF's competition here
BHPLF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CHZQ's competition here
BHPLF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while IIDDY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check IIDDY's competition here
BHPLF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PTNDY's competition here
BHPLF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MIMTF's competition here
BHPLF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check NICMF's competition here
BHPLF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check DWMNF's competition here
BHPLF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AZZVF's competition here
BHPLF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AFBOF's competition here
BHPLF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SOUHY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.23. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SOUHY's competition here
BHPLF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ERMAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ERMAY's competition here
BHPLF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ILKAY trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ILKAY's competition here
BHPLF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ILKAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ILKAF's competition here
BHPLF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ERMAF's competition here
BHPLF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PTNDF's competition here
BHPLF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check DETRF's competition here
BHPLF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check TAOFF's competition here
BHPLF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while LINRF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check LINRF's competition here
BHPLF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ADMLF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ADMLF's competition here
BHPLF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ADTLF's competition here
BHPLF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check NCKAF's competition here
BHPLF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AZRMF's competition here
BHPLF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MFRVF's competition here
BHPLF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while FMCXF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check FMCXF's competition here
BHPLF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 995.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AFMJF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AFMJF's competition here
BHPLF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 984.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ATUSF trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ATUSF's competition here
BHPLF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check STTSY's competition here
BHPLF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 916.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AMVMF trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AMVMF's competition here
BHPLF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check AUSDF's competition here
BHPLF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ALMTF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ALMTF's competition here
BHPLF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 776M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PXMFF's competition here
BHPLF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check BIRNF's competition here
BHPLF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 624.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while REEMF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check REEMF's competition here
BHPLF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CTJHF's competition here
BHPLF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while VULNF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check VULNF's competition here
BHPLF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 553.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MJDLF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MJDLF's competition here
BHPLF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CREQF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CREQF's competition here
BHPLF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 512.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PMETF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -105.23. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PMETF's competition here
BHPLF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 510.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SLGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SLGGF's competition here
BHPLF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check TTNNF's competition here
BHPLF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while BQSSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check BQSSF's competition here
BHPLF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PTTMF's competition here
BHPLF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check OSTTF's competition here
BHPLF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while FGOVF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -92.42. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check FGOVF's competition here
BHPLF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MCRZF's competition here
BHPLF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 450.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MNXMF's competition here
BHPLF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 408.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CGMLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CGMLF's competition here
BHPLF vs LLLAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 393.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while LLLAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check LLLAF's competition here
BHPLF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check NQMIY's competition here
BHPLF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while KMRPF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check KMRPF's competition here
BHPLF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MLYF's competition here
BHPLF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while FWEDF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check FWEDF's competition here
BHPLF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check CTJHY's competition here
BHPLF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 347.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MLXEF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MLXEF's competition here
BHPLF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ARAFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ARAFF's competition here
BHPLF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SRHYY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SRHYY's competition here
BHPLF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MCHHF's competition here
BHPLF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SVMLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SVMLF's competition here
BHPLF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while ERLFF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check ERLFF's competition here
BHPLF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check BSSMF's competition here
BHPLF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while PRMNF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -20.22. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check PRMNF's competition here
BHPLF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check RTLGF's competition here
BHPLF vs SYAAF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 285.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while SYAAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check SYAAF's competition here
BHPLF vs TLOFF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while TLOFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check TLOFF's competition here
BHPLF vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MMILF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MMILF's competition here
BHPLF vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check LRSRF's competition here
BHPLF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
BHPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHPLF stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 258.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHPLF is priced at $28.50, while MGMNF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, BHPLF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BHPLF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHPLF.Check MGMNF's competition here