Verizon Communications Inc.
Verizon Communications Inc. BAC.DE Peers
See (BAC.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAC.DE | $39.29 | +0.20% | 165.66B | 10.48 | $3.75 | +5.83% |
| TM5.DE | $217.30 | +0.46% | 246.73B | 23.75 | $9.15 | +1.21% |
| SOBA.DE | $24.84 | +0.59% | 178.70B | 17.01 | $1.46 | +4.27% |
| CTM.F | $8.56 | N/A | 177.08B | 10.19 | $0.84 | +0.92% |
| DTE.DE | $33.47 | +1.42% | 164.02B | 13.66 | $2.45 | +2.69% |
| CTP2.DE | $31.55 | -0.39% | 117.48B | 8.69 | $3.63 | +3.54% |
| SFT.F | $46.80 | -1.99% | 67.28B | 9.79 | $4.78 | +0.30% |
| FTE.DE | $12.86 | +0.43% | 34.17B | 17.14 | $0.75 | +5.60% |
| TNE5.DE | $4.50 | +1.26% | 25.37B | -49.94 | -$0.09 | +3.34% |
| AISF.F | $7.85 | +1.95% | 23.35B | 23.09 | $0.34 | +1.68% |
Stock Comparison
BAC.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 246.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TM5.DE trades at $217.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 178.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while SOBA.DE trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs CTM.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, CTM.F has a market cap of 177.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while CTM.F trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CTM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTM.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to CTM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 164.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while DTE.DE trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 117.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while CTP2.DE trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs SFT.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, SFT.F has a market cap of 67.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while SFT.F trades at $46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SFT.F's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFT.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to SFT.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 34.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while FTE.DE trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 25.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TNE5.DE trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is -49.94. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs AISF.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, AISF.F has a market cap of 23.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while AISF.F trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas AISF.F's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AISF.F's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to AISF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 21.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while VODI.DE trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs BTQ.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while BTQ.DE trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs O2D.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while O2D.DE trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs SWTF.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, SWTF.F has a market cap of 7.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while SWTF.F trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SWTF.F's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWTF.F's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to SWTF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TA1.DE trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TQI.DE trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs TQIR.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TQIR.DE trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to TQIR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs TAFG.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TAFG.F has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TAFG.F trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TAFG.F's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TAFG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to TAFG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while FNTN.DE trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE and FNTN.DE have similar daily volatility (1.15).
BAC.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while FNTN.HM trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while UTDI.DE trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is -73.87. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while 1U1.DE trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs JASN.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, JASN.F has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while JASN.F trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas JASN.F's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JASN.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to JASN.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs 4HW.F Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, 4HW.F has a market cap of 62.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while 4HW.F trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas 4HW.F's P/E ratio is -22.71. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 4HW.F's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to 4HW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 46.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while E4C.DE trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 23.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while LSX.DE trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs TGT.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, TGT.DE has a market cap of 15.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while TGT.DE trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TGT.DE's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGT.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is less volatile compared to TGT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.
BAC.DE vs C1V.DE Comparison
BAC.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAC.DE stands at 165.66B. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BAC.DE is priced at $39.29, while C1V.DE trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, BAC.DE's ROE is +0.18%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BAC.DE is more volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAC.DE.