Atalaya Mining Plc
Atalaya Mining Plc AYM.TO Peers
See (AYM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AYM.TO | $5.78 | +8.85% | 835.77M | 10.70 | $0.54 | N/A |
| FM.TO | $20.17 | +4.02% | 16.70B | 80.68 | $0.25 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | $12.45 | +4.32% | 10.80B | 1244.50 | $0.01 | +2.89% |
| CS.TO | $7.15 | +2.88% | 5.45B | -34.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | $11.66 | +8.97% | 4.61B | 41.64 | $0.28 | +0.17% |
| ERO.TO | $19.05 | +2.09% | 1.97B | 76.20 | $0.25 | N/A |
| IE.TO | $9.38 | +0.75% | 1.24B | -8.02 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | $2.95 | +4.61% | 931.83M | -14.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| III.TO | $3.63 | +0.83% | 587.89M | 5.58 | $0.65 | N/A |
| CMMC.TO | $2.49 | -1.19% | 533.81M | -9.58 | -$0.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AYM.TO vs FM.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while FM.TO trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 80.68. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while LUN.TO trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 1244.50. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs CS.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while CS.TO trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is -34.05. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while HBM.TO trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while ERO.TO trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 76.20. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs IE.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while IE.TO trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 931.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while TKO.TO trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs III.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 587.89M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while III.TO trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while CMMC.TO trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 470.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while MARI.TO trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -24.47. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 300.00M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while ASCU.TO trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 284.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while ARG.TO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 164.41M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while FDY.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.89M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while NCU.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while DNT.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO and DNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AYM.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while RCLF.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AYM.TO has daily volatility of 0.00 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
AYM.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 15.50M. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while CCI.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYM.TO.
AYM.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704674.00. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while AFX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO and AFX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AYM.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison
AYM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYM.TO stands at 835.77M. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, AYM.TO is priced at $5.78, while JUBA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.70, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, AYM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AYM.TO and JUBA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).