Awilco Drilling PLC
Awilco Drilling PLC (AWLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AWLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Drilling Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWLCF | $1.81 | +0.00% | 44.8M | 0.10 | $19.00 | +113.81% |
| YZCFF | $0.07 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 6.54 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ESVIF | $1.64 | -0.61% | 302.9M | -27.33 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| PHXHF | $6.01 | -1.31% | 273.1M | 6.68 | $0.90 | +9.42% |
| SHLLF | $0.94 | +0.00% | 240.9M | 2.47 | $0.38 | N/A |
| ARHVF | $2.34 | +0.00% | 211.9M | -5.20 | -$0.45 | +2.62% |
| NTNOF | $0.56 | +0.00% | 176.8M | -2.53 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| VTDRF | $12.00 | +0.00% | 159.5M | -4.21 | -$2.85 | N/A |
| CETEF | $3.41 | +0.89% | 114.4M | 3.34 | $1.02 | N/A |
| AKTAF | $1.53 | +1.32% | 58.3M | 4.50 | $0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AWLCF vs YZCFF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, YZCFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while YZCFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas YZCFF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to YZCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to YZCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check YZCFF's competition here
AWLCF vs ESVIF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ESVIF has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ESVIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ESVIF's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to ESVIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to ESVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ESVIF's competition here
AWLCF vs PHXHF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, PHXHF has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while PHXHF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas PHXHF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to PHXHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to PHXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check PHXHF's competition here
AWLCF vs SHLLF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, SHLLF has a market cap of 240.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while SHLLF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas SHLLF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to SHLLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to SHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check SHLLF's competition here
AWLCF vs ARHVF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ARHVF has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ARHVF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ARHVF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to ARHVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to ARHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ARHVF's competition here
AWLCF vs NTNOF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NTNOF has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NTNOF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NTNOF's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to NTNOF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NTNOF's competition here
AWLCF vs VTDRF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, VTDRF has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while VTDRF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas VTDRF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to VTDRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to VTDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check VTDRF's competition here
AWLCF vs CETEF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, CETEF has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while CETEF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas CETEF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to CETEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to CETEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check CETEF's competition here
AWLCF vs AKTAF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, AKTAF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while AKTAF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas AKTAF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to AKTAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to AKTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check AKTAF's competition here
AWLCF vs DODRW Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, DODRW has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while DODRW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas DODRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to DODRW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to DODRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check DODRW's competition here
AWLCF vs WEEEF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, WEEEF has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while WEEEF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas WEEEF's P/E ratio is -14.09. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to WEEEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to WEEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check WEEEF's competition here
AWLCF vs AGDY Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, AGDY has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while AGDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas AGDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to AGDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to AGDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check AGDY's competition here
AWLCF vs NBLWF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NBLWF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NBLWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NBLWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to NBLWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NBLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NBLWF's competition here
AWLCF vs PDGO Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, PDGO has a market cap of 708.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while PDGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas PDGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to PDGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to PDGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check PDGO's competition here
AWLCF vs ENSRF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ENSRF has a market cap of 557.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ENSRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ENSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to ENSRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to ENSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ENSRF's competition here
AWLCF vs WBRE Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, WBRE has a market cap of 112K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while WBRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas WBRE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to WBRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to WBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check WBRE's competition here
AWLCF vs EXLA Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, EXLA has a market cap of 73.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while EXLA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas EXLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to EXLA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to EXLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check EXLA's competition here
AWLCF vs VTGDF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, VTGDF has a market cap of 31.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while VTGDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas VTGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to VTGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to VTGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check VTGDF's competition here
AWLCF vs TSCAF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, TSCAF has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while TSCAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas TSCAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to TSCAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to TSCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check TSCAF's competition here
AWLCF vs TISDZ Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, TISDZ has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while TISDZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas TISDZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to TISDZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to TISDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check TISDZ's competition here
AWLCF vs BRCOQ Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, BRCOQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while BRCOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas BRCOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to BRCOQ's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to BRCOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check BRCOQ's competition here
AWLCF vs FRGY Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, FRGY has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while FRGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas FRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to FRGY's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to FRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check FRGY's competition here
AWLCF vs ENYNF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ENYNF has a market cap of 429. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ENYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ENYNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to ENYNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to ENYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ENYNF's competition here
AWLCF vs JSTS Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, JSTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while JSTS trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas JSTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to JSTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to JSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check JSTS's competition here
AWLCF vs NBLRF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NBLRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NBLRF trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NBLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to NBLRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NBLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NBLRF's competition here
AWLCF vs NBLTF Comparison August 2025
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NBLTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NBLTF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NBLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is +3.48%, compared to NBLTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NBLTF's competition here