AutoWeb, Inc.
AutoWeb, Inc. (AUTO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AUTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTO | $0.39 | +0.78% | 0 | -0.50 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| GOOGL | $194.67 | -0.19% | 2.4T | 20.13 | $9.67 | +0.42% |
| GOOG | $195.32 | -0.22% | 2.4T | 20.20 | $9.67 | +0.42% |
| META | $763.46 | -1.66% | 1.9T | 27.73 | $27.53 | +0.27% |
| SPOT | $647.00 | -1.76% | 131.5B | 147.46 | $4.39 | N/A |
| DASH | $255.28 | -1.06% | 108.2B | 319.10 | $0.80 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| RDDT | $199.09 | -1.32% | 37.8B | 88.88 | $2.24 | N/A |
| TME | $21.55 | +1.03% | 32.7B | 25.35 | $0.85 | +0.84% |
| BIDU | $85.86 | -2.03% | 29.9B | 8.48 | $10.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AUTO vs GOOGL Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GOOGL trades at $194.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GOOGL's competition here
AUTO vs GOOG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GOOG trades at $195.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GOOG's competition here
AUTO vs META Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while META trades at $763.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check META's competition here
AUTO vs SPOT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SPOT trades at $647.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 147.46. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SPOT's competition here
AUTO vs DASH Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while DASH trades at $255.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 319.10. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check DASH's competition here
AUTO vs TWTR Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TWTR's competition here
AUTO vs RDDT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while RDDT trades at $199.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 88.88. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check RDDT's competition here
AUTO vs TME Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TME trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TME's competition here
AUTO vs BIDU Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while BIDU trades at $85.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check BIDU's competition here
AUTO vs PINS Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while PINS trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check PINS's competition here
AUTO vs ZG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ZG trades at $79.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -226.43. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ZG's competition here
AUTO vs Z Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while Z trades at $82.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -235.60. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check Z's competition here
AUTO vs TWLO Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TWLO trades at $124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -541.96. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TWLO's competition here
AUTO vs SNAP Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SNAP trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -30.35. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SNAP's competition here
AUTO vs YNDX Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check YNDX's competition here
AUTO vs NBIS Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while NBIS trades at $55.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check NBIS's competition here
AUTO vs MTCH Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while MTCH trades at $33.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check MTCH's competition here
AUTO vs IACVV Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check IACVV's competition here
AUTO vs DJT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while DJT trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check DJT's competition here
AUTO vs DJTWW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while DJTWW trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -23.49. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check DJTWW's competition here
AUTO vs CARG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while CARG trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 85.08. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check CARG's competition here
AUTO vs GENI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GENI trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -64.32. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GENI's competition here
AUTO vs IAC Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while IAC trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check IAC's competition here
AUTO vs JOYY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while JOYY trades at $50.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.27. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check JOYY's competition here
AUTO vs WB Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while WB trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check WB's competition here
AUTO vs DOYU Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while DOYU trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check DOYU's competition here
AUTO vs YELP Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while YELP trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check YELP's competition here
AUTO vs YY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check YY's competition here
AUTO vs NN Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while NN trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check NN's competition here
AUTO vs ANGIV Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ANGIV's competition here
AUTO vs MOMO Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while MOMO trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check MOMO's competition here
AUTO vs GRPN Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GRPN trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -30.44. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GRPN's competition here
AUTO vs TBLA Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TBLA trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 80.25. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TBLA's competition here
AUTO vs NNAVW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 859.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while NNAVW trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check NNAVW's competition here
AUTO vs EVER Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 859.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while EVER trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check EVER's competition here
AUTO vs TBLAW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 830.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TBLAW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TBLAW's competition here
AUTO vs ATHM Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 814.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ATHM trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ATHM's competition here
AUTO vs FVRR Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 800.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while FVRR trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 44.30. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check FVRR's competition here
AUTO vs ANGI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 752M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ANGI trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ANGI's competition here
AUTO vs OPRA Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 723.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while OPRA trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check OPRA's competition here
AUTO vs GETY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 721.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GETY trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GETY's competition here
AUTO vs KIND Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while KIND trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check KIND's competition here
AUTO vs SSTK Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 714.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SSTK trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SSTK's competition here
AUTO vs JFIN Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 696.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while JFIN trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check JFIN's competition here
AUTO vs MAX Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 683.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while MAX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check MAX's competition here
AUTO vs SMWB Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 609.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SMWB trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -33.45. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SMWB's competition here
AUTO vs THRY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 587M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while THRY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check THRY's competition here
AUTO vs TTGT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TTGT trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TTGT's competition here
AUTO vs PERI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while PERI trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -56.94. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check PERI's competition here
AUTO vs ZH Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 404.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ZH trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -147.00. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ZH's competition here
AUTO vs TRVG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TRVG trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TRVG's competition here
AUTO vs AREN Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 322.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while AREN trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check AREN's competition here
AUTO vs UPXI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 283.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while UPXI trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check UPXI's competition here
AUTO vs OB Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check OB's competition here
AUTO vs TRUE Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TRUE trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TRUE's competition here
AUTO vs SEAT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SEAT trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SEAT's competition here
AUTO vs ILLR Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ILLR trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ILLR's competition here
AUTO vs ILLRW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ILLRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ILLRW's competition here
AUTO vs MNY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while MNY trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check MNY's competition here
AUTO vs BZFD Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while BZFD trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check BZFD's competition here
AUTO vs CCG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while CCG trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check CCG's competition here
AUTO vs IZEA Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while IZEA trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check IZEA's competition here
AUTO vs BODY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check BODY's competition here
AUTO vs ASST Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ASST trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ASST's competition here
AUTO vs ZDGE Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ZDGE trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -29.15. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ZDGE's competition here
AUTO vs PODC Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while PODC trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check PODC's competition here
AUTO vs EGLX Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check EGLX's competition here
AUTO vs GIFT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GIFT trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GIFT's competition here
AUTO vs SOGP Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SOGP trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SOGP's competition here
AUTO vs BODI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while BODI trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check BODI's competition here
AUTO vs SCOR Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SCOR trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SCOR's competition here
AUTO vs NAMI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while NAMI trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check NAMI's competition here
AUTO vs LTRPB Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LTRPB's competition here
AUTO vs LTRPA Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LTRPA's competition here
AUTO vs SEATW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SEATW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SEATW's competition here
AUTO vs LYL Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LYL's competition here
AUTO vs HRYU Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check HRYU's competition here
AUTO vs LIZI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LIZI's competition here
AUTO vs LCFYW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LCFYW trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -136.36. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LCFYW's competition here
AUTO vs FAZEW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check FAZEW's competition here
AUTO vs FAZE Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check FAZE's competition here
AUTO vs LKCO Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LKCO's competition here
AUTO vs KRKR Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while KRKR trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check KRKR's competition here
AUTO vs LCFY Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LCFY trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LCFY's competition here
AUTO vs ONFO Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ONFO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ONFO's competition here
AUTO vs QTT Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check QTT's competition here
AUTO vs LOV Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check LOV's competition here
AUTO vs ROI Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ROI's competition here
AUTO vs SLE Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SLE trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SLE's competition here
AUTO vs CRTD Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while CRTD trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check CRTD's competition here
AUTO vs MNYWW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while MNYWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check MNYWW's competition here
AUTO vs CMCM Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while CMCM trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check CMCM's competition here
AUTO vs TC Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while TC trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check TC's competition here
AUTO vs STBX Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check STBX's competition here
AUTO vs ONFOW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 776.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check ONFOW's competition here
AUTO vs SLGG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check SLGG's competition here
AUTO vs FENG Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 245.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while FENG trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check FENG's competition here
AUTO vs GROM Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GROM's competition here
AUTO vs GROMW Comparison August 2025
AUTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUTO stands at 0. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AUTO is priced at $0.39, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUTO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AUTO is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUTO.Check GROMW's competition here