What are the top competitors of Aritzia Inc. in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Aritzia Inc. in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE), Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Aritzia Inc. or its competitors?

Aritzia Inc. has a market cap of 7B and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Aritzia Inc. or its competitors?

Aritzia Inc. has an EPS of CA$2.00, while LULU.NE has an EPS of CA$0.67. So, Aritzia Inc. is more profitable compared to LULU.NE.

What is Aritzia Inc. stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Aritzia Inc. has daily volatility of 2.61% as compared to its competitor LULU.NE which is 4.47%. Aritzia Inc. is less volatile as compared to competitors and has low risk.

Is Aritzia Inc. stock profitable?

Aritzia Inc. has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.23%. So, Aritzia Inc. is more profitable.

What is Aritzia Inc. stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Aritzia Inc. stock has a 52-week high of (CA$78.88) and a low of (CA$36.51).

What was the average volume of Aritzia Inc. stock?

The average volume of Aritzia Inc. is (481K) in terms of investment.

Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) Competitors

Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (ATZ.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
ATZ.TO	CA$73.61	-1.02%	7B	36.81	CA$2.00	N/A
LULU.NE	CA$8.62	-3.69%	33.5B	12.87	CA$0.67	N/A
ROOT.TO	CA$3.17	-1.25%	127.9M	-3.91	-CA$0.81	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ATZ.TO vs LULU.NE Comparison August 2025

ATZ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATZ.TO stands at 7B. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATZ.TO is priced at CA$73.61, while LULU.NE trades at CA$8.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.81, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, ATZ.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ATZ.TO is less volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATZ.TO.Check LULU.NE's competition here

Aritzia Inc.