Altius Minerals Corporation

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while BHPLF trades at $35.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check BHPLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while RTNTF trades at $116.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check RTNTF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while RTPPF trades at $94.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check RTPPF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while GMBXF trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check GMBXF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while GLNCY trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -42.84. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check GLNCY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while GLCNF trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check GLCNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while CMCLF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check CMCLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NGLOY trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NGLOY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AAUKF trades at $45.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -28.90. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AAUKF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while FSUMF trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check FSUMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while FSUGY trades at $28.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check FSUGY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while TCKRF trades at $57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check TCKRF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while IPOAF trades at $58.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check IPOAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while BDNNY trades at $143.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check BDNNY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while SMMYY trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 108.47. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check SMMYY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while IVPAF trades at $11.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 52.59. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check IVPAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while STMNF trades at $57.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 100.44. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check STMNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while SHTLF trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check SHTLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while SOUHY trades at $15.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check SOUHY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while LYSCF trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 1119.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check LYSCF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while LYSDY trades at $11.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 1105.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check LYSDY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PILBF trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PILBF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check BOLIF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MALRY trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MALRY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MALRY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PUTKY trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PUTKY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ABML's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MALRF trades at $33.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MALRF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MALRF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PUTKF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NGXXF trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -54.85. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NGXXF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NILSY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MIMTF trades at $34.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MIMTF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PTNDY trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PTNDY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while IPGDF trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check IPGDF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while IIDDY trades at $10.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check IIDDY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PAEKY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PTNDF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PTNDF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while LINRF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check LINRF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NICMF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NICMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check FLMMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while DWMNF trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check DWMNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while FMCXF trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -121.75. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check FMCXF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AFBOF trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 123.50. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AFBOF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AZZVF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AUSDF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AUSDF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ERMAY trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ERMAY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while DETRF trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check DETRF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ILKAY trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ILKAY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ILKAF trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ILKAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PTTMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ERMAF trades at $54.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ERMAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ADMLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ADTLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AMVMF trades at $41.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AMVMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AFMJF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AFMJF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while TAOFF trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check TAOFF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MCHHF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MCHHF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while SLGGF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check SLGGF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AZRMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MFRVF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PXMFF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PXMFF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MJDLF trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MJDLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check STTSY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while TTNNF trades at $12.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check TTNNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while SYAXF trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check SYAXF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 884.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MNXMF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -135.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MNXMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ALMTF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NCKAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NCKAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 817.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MLXEF trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MLXEF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check BIRNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while VULNF trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check VULNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while CHXMF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check CHXMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while CGMLF trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check CGMLF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while GDQMF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check GDQMF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PMETF trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PMETF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 628.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while BENZF trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check BENZF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while OSTTF trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check OSTTF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while FGOVF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -106.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check FGOVF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 563.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NTCPF trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NTCPF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while UURAF trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check UURAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MRRDF trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MRRDF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MGMNF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 217.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MGMNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 535.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while FWEDF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check FWEDF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 526.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while OMZNF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check OMZNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while BQSSF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check BQSSF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ARAAF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ARAAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 478.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ECRAF trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ECRAF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check MCRZF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 452.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while TLOFF trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check TLOFF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while RGLSF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check RGLSF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check PRMNF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ERLFF trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ERLFF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 417.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while JMXXF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check JMXXF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while CTJHY trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check CTJHY's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while RTRFF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check RTRFF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while AUMTF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check AUMTF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 387.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ARAFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ARAFF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while ERDCF trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check ERDCF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while CXOXF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check CXOXF's competition here

ATUSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUSF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATUSF is priced at $32.04, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, ATUSF's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUSF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUSF.Check NQMIY's competition here