Archer Limited

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, YZCFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while YZCFF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas YZCFF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to YZCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to YZCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check YZCFF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, ESVIF has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while ESVIF trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas ESVIF's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ESVIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to ESVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check ESVIF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, PHXHF has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while PHXHF trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas PHXHF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PHXHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to PHXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check PHXHF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, SHLLF has a market cap of 240.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while SHLLF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas SHLLF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SHLLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to SHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check SHLLF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, NTNOF has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while NTNOF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas NTNOF's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NTNOF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to NTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check NTNOF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, VTDRF has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while VTDRF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas VTDRF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VTDRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to VTDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check VTDRF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, CETEF has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while CETEF trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas CETEF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CETEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to CETEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check CETEF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, AKTAF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while AKTAF trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas AKTAF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AKTAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to AKTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check AKTAF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, DODRW has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while DODRW trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas DODRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DODRW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to DODRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check DODRW's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, WEEEF has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while WEEEF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas WEEEF's P/E ratio is -14.09. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WEEEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to WEEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check WEEEF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, AWLCF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while AWLCF trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas AWLCF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AWLCF's ROE of +3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to AWLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check AWLCF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, AGDY has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while AGDY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas AGDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AGDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to AGDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check AGDY's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, NBLWF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while NBLWF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas NBLWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NBLWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to NBLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check NBLWF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, PDGO has a market cap of 708.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while PDGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas PDGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PDGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to PDGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check PDGO's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, ENSRF has a market cap of 557.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while ENSRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas ENSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ENSRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to ENSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check ENSRF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, WBRE has a market cap of 112K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while WBRE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas WBRE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WBRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to WBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check WBRE's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, EXLA has a market cap of 73.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while EXLA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas EXLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EXLA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to EXLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check EXLA's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, VTGDF has a market cap of 31.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while VTGDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas VTGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VTGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to VTGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check VTGDF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, TSCAF has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while TSCAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas TSCAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TSCAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to TSCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check TSCAF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, TISDZ has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while TISDZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas TISDZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TISDZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to TISDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check TISDZ's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, BRCOQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while BRCOQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas BRCOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BRCOQ's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to BRCOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check BRCOQ's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, FRGY has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while FRGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas FRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FRGY's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to FRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check FRGY's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, ENYNF has a market cap of 429. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while ENYNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas ENYNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ENYNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is less volatile compared to ENYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check ENYNF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, JSTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while JSTS trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas JSTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to JSTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to JSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check JSTS's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, NBLTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while NBLTF trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas NBLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NBLTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to NBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check NBLTF's competition here

ARHVF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHVF stands at 211.9M. In comparison, NBLRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHVF is priced at $2.34, while NBLRF trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHVF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.20, whereas NBLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHVF's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NBLRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHVF is more volatile compared to NBLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHVF.Check NBLRF's competition here