Algonquin Power & Utilities Cor

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SRE has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SRE trades at $99.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRE's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to SRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SRE's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELP has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while ELP trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELP's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to ELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check ELP's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIP has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BIP trades at $36.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIP's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BIP's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check AESC's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while AES trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check AES's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while CIG-C trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check CIG-C's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIP-PA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BIP-PA trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIP-PA's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIP-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BIP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BIP-PA's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIP-PB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BIP-PB trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIP-PB's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIP-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BIP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BIP-PB's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while CIG trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to CIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check CIG's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BKH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while BKH trades at $70.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKH's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BKH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to BKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check BKH's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SJI trades at $36.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SJI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is more volatile compared to SJI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SJI's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while NWE trades at $67.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to NWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check NWE's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ALE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while ALE trades at $67.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALE's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to ALE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check ALE's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while OTTR trades at $88.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check OTTR's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while AVA trades at $41.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVA's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to AVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check AVA's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while MGEE trades at $78.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check MGEE's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while HE trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to HE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check HE's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while ELPC trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check ELPC's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, UTL has a market cap of 966.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while UTL trades at $53.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTL's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to UTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check UTL's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MNTK has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while MNTK trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTK's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNTK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to MNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check MNTK's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJIJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SJIJ trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJIJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SJIJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to SJIJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SJIJ's competition here

AQNA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AQNA stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQNA is priced at $25.10, while SJIV trades at $67.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AQNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQNA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SJIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQNA is less volatile compared to SJIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQNA.Check SJIV's competition here