Apar Industries Limited

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹7,778.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 45.85. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹7,773.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 45.92. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹696.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 100.11. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹696.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 100.21. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 886.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,396.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.54. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 885.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,396.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 59.69. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 455.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while KEI.NS trades at ₹4,568.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check KEI.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 455.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while KEI.BO trades at ₹4,567.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 52.79. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check KEI.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 429.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹10,074.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 279.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹31,058.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 55.40. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 279.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹31,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 55.23. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 218.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹906.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 195.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹727.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 195.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹727.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 164.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹1,425.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹1,418.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹847.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹848.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹322.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 49.42. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹322.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 49.26. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹683.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹682.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 56.41. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 126.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹801.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹801.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check TRIL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check TRIL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HEG.BO trades at ₹545.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HEG.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HEG.NS trades at ₹545.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HEG.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹304.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check TARIL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹8,258.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹8,256.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, STLTECH.BO has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while STLTECH.BO trades at ₹156.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas STLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 2788.33. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STLTECH.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to STLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check STLTECH.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹263.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹263.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹857.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 63.96. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹858.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 63.77. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹291.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹291.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹3,896.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹317.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹319.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,501.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check BBL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,503.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check BBL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,298.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 51.49. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,299.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹140.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 73.85. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹327.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹329.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 59.05. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹698.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹697.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HPL.NS trades at ₹365.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HPL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HPL.BO trades at ₹365.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HPL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,410.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 54.45. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹79.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 61.31. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹1,425.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹1,425.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹299.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check DYCL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹298.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check DYCL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹97.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹97.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹262.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹662.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹663.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹160.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check SALZER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹256.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check MEIL.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹138.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check ELIN.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹138.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check ELIN.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹561.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while WSI.NS trades at ₹73.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check WSI.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.32. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check AEPL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while RMC.BO trades at ₹425.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check RMC.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹140.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹141.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹502.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹329.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 51.27. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹2,307.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check HUIL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹620.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check DENORA.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹618.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check DENORA.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹903.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 50.72. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹25.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹348.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -47.02. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹350.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -46.88. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while DEL.BO trades at ₹179.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 58.78. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check DEL.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PANAENERG.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PANAENERG.BO trades at ₹298.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PANAENERG.BO's P/E ratio is 77.77. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANAENERG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to PANAENERG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PANAENERG.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PANCARBON.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PANCARBON.BO trades at ₹475.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PANCARBON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANCARBON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to PANCARBON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PANCARBON.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹170.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹170.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while VETO.BO trades at ₹103.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check VETO.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while VETO.NS trades at ₹103.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check VETO.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹74.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check APLAB.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, LAKSELEC.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while LAKSELEC.BO trades at ₹752.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas LAKSELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LAKSELEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to LAKSELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check LAKSELEC.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PLAZACABLE.BO trades at ₹39.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PLAZACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 49.37. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLAZACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is more volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PLAZACABLE.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while PLAZACABLE.NS trades at ₹39.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas PLAZACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 49.10. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLAZACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check PLAZACABLE.NS's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹922.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.83. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here

APARINDS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APARINDS.NS stands at 429.4B. In comparison, STARDELTA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APARINDS.NS is priced at ₹10,063.50, while STARDELTA.BO trades at ₹486.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APARINDS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.18, whereas STARDELTA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, APARINDS.NS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STARDELTA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APARINDS.NS is less volatile compared to STARDELTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APARINDS.NS.Check STARDELTA.BO's competition here