American Software, Inc.
American Software, Inc. AMSWA Peers
See (AMSWA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMSWA | $10.95 | -2.14% | 388.5M | 40.56 | $0.27 | +2.01% |
| SAP | $297.97 | -1.28% | 347.6B | 53.98 | $5.52 | +0.88% |
| CRM | $276.33 | -0.31% | 265.1B | 43.52 | $6.35 | +0.59% |
| NOW | $1,020.97 | -0.63% | 211.3B | 139.29 | $7.33 | N/A |
| INTU | $754.45 | +0.33% | 210.5B | 59.03 | $12.78 | +0.53% |
| UBER | $88.27 | -0.83% | 184.6B | 15.46 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $107.11 | +0.35% | 139.8B | 87.08 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $390.26 | +2.45% | 132B | 70.70 | $5.52 | N/A |
| MSTR | $364.25 | -2.14% | 99.4B | -16.36 | -$22.26 | N/A |
| CDNS | $288.61 | -10.67% | 78.8B | 71.44 | $4.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMSWA vs SAP Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 347.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SAP trades at $297.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CRM Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 265.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CRM trades at $276.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs NOW Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 211.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NOW trades at $1,020.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 139.29. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs INTU Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INTU trades at $754.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs UBER Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 184.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while UBER trades at $88.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SHOP Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 139.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SHOP trades at $107.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 87.08. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs APP Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while APP trades at $390.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 70.70. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs MSTR Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MSTR trades at $364.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CDNS Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CDNS trades at $288.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 71.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SNOW Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SNOW trades at $204.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -48.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs WDAY Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while WDAY trades at $239.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 131.81. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ADSK Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ADSK trades at $299.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 62.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs TEAM Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TEAM trades at $213.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -129.11. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DDOG Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DDOG trades at $116.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 247.40. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs FICO Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FICO trades at $1,619.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 69.91. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs TTD Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TTD trades at $76.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 93.83. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs HUBS Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while HUBS trades at $616.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1434.09. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ANSS Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ANSS trades at $330.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 48.82. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs STRK Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRK trades at $101.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs TYL Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TYL trades at $573.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.67. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs STRF Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRF trades at $101.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ZM Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZM trades at $79.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DUOL Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DUOL trades at $524.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 258.33. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PTC Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PTC trades at $167.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SSNC Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SSNC trades at $80.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs GRAB Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRAB trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 497.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs GWRE Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GWRE trades at $208.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -994.05. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DOCU Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DOCU trades at $85.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs AZPN Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DT trades at $53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs MNDY Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MNDY trades at $297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 294.06. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PAYC Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PAYC trades at $259.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BSY Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BSY trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BKI Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs MANH Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MANH trades at $188.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs XM Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CDAY Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PCTY Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PCTY trades at $193.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 48.30. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs TTAN Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TTAN trades at $115.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -13.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs NICE Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NICE trades at $164.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs U Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while U trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PCOR Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PCOR trades at $67.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.20. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs QXO Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while QXO trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -48.40. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DSGX Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DSGX trades at $114.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 69.80. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ESTC Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ESTC trades at $92.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -70.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DAY Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAY trades at $57.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 360.50. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PEGA Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PEGA trades at $96.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 44.60. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs NATI Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SMAR Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CVLT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CVLT trades at $176.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 102.79. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs GTLB Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GTLB trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1156.25. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SRAD Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SRAD trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 126.53. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs APPF Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while APPF trades at $206.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.56. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs OTEX Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while OTEX trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs LYFT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while LYFT trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 106.53. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs VERX Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while VERX trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -136.34. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CWAN Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CWAN trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs COUP Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BULL Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BULL trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SYT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SYT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ETWO-WT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs IDCC Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while IDCC trades at $213.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs QTWO Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while QTWO trades at $87.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -257.50. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs FROG Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FROG trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.17. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs LIF Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while LIF trades at $62.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 483.08. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs GRND Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRND trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -39.75. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BILL Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BILL trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2224.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs INTA Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INTA trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -229.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs FRSH Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FRSH trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -60.12. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs SOUN Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SOUN trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ASAN Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ASAN trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs RUMBW Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while RUMBW trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CVT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PYCR Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs RUM Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while RUM trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BRZE Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BRZE trades at $36.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -35.36. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PWSC Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ZI Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs WK Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while WK trades at $66.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.34. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs AYX Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ENV Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs INST Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BL Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BL trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ZETA Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZETA trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -53.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs NCNO Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NCNO trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -81.15. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs CALX Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CALX trades at $47.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -90.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs COMP Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while COMP trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -44.81. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs RIOT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while RIOT trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DAVEW Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAVEW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BLKB Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BLKB trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ALKT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ALKT trades at $28.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -78.08. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs GBTG Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GBTG trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -62.15. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs AGYS Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AGYS trades at $105.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 129.18. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs DAVE Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAVE trades at $216.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ALIT Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ALIT trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -90.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs ALRM Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ALRM trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs BTDR Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BTDR trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PRGS Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PRGS trades at $61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.
AMSWA vs PAR Comparison
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PAR trades at $65.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -25.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.