American Software, Inc.
American Software, Inc. (AMSWA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMSWA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMSWA | $10.95 | -2.14% | 388.5M | 40.56 | $0.27 | N/A |
| SAP | $168.29 | +2.60% | 196.1B | 23.88 | $7.05 | +1.57% |
| CRM | $185.03 | +3.19% | 173.3B | 23.72 | $7.80 | +0.91% |
| SHOP | $111.77 | -0.07% | 145.9B | 118.90 | $0.94 | N/A |
| UBER | $69.91 | +1.06% | 143.9B | 14.78 | $4.73 | N/A |
| APP | $372.08 | -2.39% | 125.7B | 37.10 | $10.03 | N/A |
| INTU | $429.03 | +3.02% | 119.4B | 27.91 | $15.37 | +1.05% |
| NOW | $104.97 | +5.59% | 109.8B | 62.87 | $1.67 | N/A |
| CDNS | $270.88 | -0.33% | 73.9B | 66.88 | $4.05 | N/A |
| SNOW | $153.67 | +0.57% | 53.1B | -38.80 | -$3.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMSWA vs SAP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SAP trades at $168.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SAP's competition here
AMSWA vs CRM Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 173.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CRM trades at $185.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CRM's competition here
AMSWA vs SHOP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SHOP trades at $111.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 118.90. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SHOP's competition here
AMSWA vs UBER Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while UBER trades at $69.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check UBER's competition here
AMSWA vs APP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while APP trades at $372.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check APP's competition here
AMSWA vs INTU Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INTU trades at $429.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check INTU's competition here
AMSWA vs NOW Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NOW trades at $104.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NOW's competition here
AMSWA vs CDNS Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CDNS trades at $270.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CDNS's competition here
AMSWA vs SNOW Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SNOW trades at $153.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -38.80. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SNOW's competition here
AMSWA vs ADSK Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ADSK trades at $235.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 44.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ADSK's competition here
AMSWA vs DDOG Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DDOG trades at $115.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 373.58. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DDOG's competition here
AMSWA vs WDAY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while WDAY trades at $128.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check WDAY's competition here
AMSWA vs MSTR Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MSTR trades at $121.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check MSTR's competition here
AMSWA vs ANSS Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ANSS's competition here
AMSWA vs STRC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRC trades at $99.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STRC's competition here
AMSWA vs STRF Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRF trades at $94.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STRF's competition here
AMSWA vs FICO Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FICO trades at $1,047.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FICO's competition here
AMSWA vs ZM Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZM trades at $78.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ZM's competition here
AMSWA vs GTOP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GTOP trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GTOP's competition here
AMSWA vs STRK Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRK trades at $69.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STRK's competition here
AMSWA vs BVC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BVC has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BVC trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BVC's P/E ratio is -155.39. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BVC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BVC's competition here
AMSWA vs TEAM Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TEAM trades at $66.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -92.89. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TEAM's competition here
AMSWA vs AZPN Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check AZPN's competition here
AMSWA vs PTC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PTC trades at $139.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PTC's competition here
AMSWA vs SSNC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SSNC trades at $66.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SSNC's competition here
AMSWA vs TYL Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TYL trades at $341.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TYL's competition here
AMSWA vs GRAB Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRAB trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 58.83. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GRAB's competition here
AMSWA vs HUBS Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while HUBS trades at $237.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 280.01. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check HUBS's competition here
AMSWA vs GWRE Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GWRE trades at $144.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 65.57. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GWRE's competition here
AMSWA vs BKI Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BKI's competition here
AMSWA vs DT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DT trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 61.90. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DT's competition here
AMSWA vs DAY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DAY's competition here
AMSWA vs XM Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check XM's competition here
AMSWA vs CDAY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CDAY's competition here
AMSWA vs TTD Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TTD trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TTD's competition here
AMSWA vs BSY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BSY trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BSY's competition here
AMSWA vs FIG Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FIG trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FIG's competition here
AMSWA vs DOCU Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DOCU trades at $47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DOCU's competition here
AMSWA vs U Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while U trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to U's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check U's competition here
AMSWA vs PCOR Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PCOR trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -83.16. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PCOR's competition here
AMSWA vs OCFT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check OCFT's competition here
AMSWA vs YMM Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while YMM trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check YMM's competition here
AMSWA vs NATI Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NATI's competition here
AMSWA vs SMAR Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SMAR's competition here
AMSWA vs MANH Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MANH trades at $130.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check MANH's competition here
AMSWA vs IDCC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while IDCC trades at $294.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check IDCC's competition here
AMSWA vs PEGA Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PEGA trades at $41.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PEGA's competition here
AMSWA vs CWAN Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CWAN trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -168.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CWAN's competition here
AMSWA vs PAYC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PAYC trades at $120.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PAYC's competition here
AMSWA vs NICE Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NICE trades at $108.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NICE's competition here
AMSWA vs COUP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check COUP's competition here
AMSWA vs DSGX Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DSGX trades at $70.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DSGX's competition here
AMSWA vs PCTY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PCTY trades at $108.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PCTY's competition here
AMSWA vs OS Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while OS trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check OS's competition here
AMSWA vs TTAN Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TTAN trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -35.06. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TTAN's competition here
AMSWA vs APPF Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while APPF trades at $155.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check APPF's competition here
AMSWA vs OTEX Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while OTEX trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check OTEX's competition here
AMSWA vs FROG Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FROG trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -68.97. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FROG's competition here
AMSWA vs ESTC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ESTC trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -62.56. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ESTC's competition here
AMSWA vs LYFT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while LYFT trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check LYFT's competition here
AMSWA vs SRAD Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SRAD trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 46.58. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SRAD's competition here
AMSWA vs YOU Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while YOU trades at $49.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 43.79. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check YOU's competition here
AMSWA vs DUOL Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DUOL trades at $94.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DUOL's competition here
AMSWA vs GRND-WT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GRND-WT's competition here
AMSWA vs CVT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CVT's competition here
AMSWA vs PYCR Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PYCR's competition here
AMSWA vs KC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while KC trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check KC's competition here
AMSWA vs FSLY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FSLY trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FSLY's competition here
AMSWA vs COMP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while COMP trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -68.45. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check COMP's competition here
AMSWA vs PWSC Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PWSC's competition here
AMSWA vs BILL Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BILL trades at $37.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -161.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BILL's competition here
AMSWA vs ZETA Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZETA trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -105.75. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ZETA's competition here
AMSWA vs GTLB Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GTLB trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -61.18. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GTLB's competition here
AMSWA vs AYX Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check AYX's competition here
AMSWA vs MNDY Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MNDY trades at $67.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check MNDY's competition here
AMSWA vs ENV Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ENV's competition here
AMSWA vs INST Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check INST's competition here
AMSWA vs ZI Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ZI's competition here
AMSWA vs WK Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while WK trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -124.91. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WK's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check WK's competition here
AMSWA vs CVLT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CVLT trades at $75.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CVLT's competition here
AMSWA vs CALX Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CALX trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 189.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CALX's competition here
AMSWA vs RNG Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while RNG trades at $36.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 75.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check RNG's competition here
AMSWA vs NATL Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NATL trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NATL's competition here
AMSWA vs LIF Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while LIF trades at $38.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA and LIF have similar daily volatility (3.44).Check LIF's competition here
AMSWA vs QTWO Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while QTWO trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 58.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check QTWO's competition here
AMSWA vs GBTG Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GBTG trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GBTG's competition here
AMSWA vs NAVN Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NAVN trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NAVN's competition here
AMSWA vs BRZE Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BRZE trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BRZE's competition here
AMSWA vs DBD Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DBD trades at $73.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DBD's competition here
AMSWA vs SOUN Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SOUN trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SOUN's competition here
AMSWA vs DCT Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DCT's competition here
AMSWA vs ADEA Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ADEA trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ADEA's competition here
AMSWA vs SPNS Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SPNS trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SPNS's competition here
AMSWA vs BULL Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BULL trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BULL's competition here
AMSWA vs FRSH Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FRSH trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FRSH's competition here
AMSWA vs GRND Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRND trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRND's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GRND's competition here
AMSWA vs DAVE Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAVE trades at $169.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DAVE's competition here
AMSWA vs NP Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NP trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -90.29. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NP's competition here
AMSWA vs BL Comparison April 2026
AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BL trades at $36.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 93.56. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BL's competition here