Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. AMR Peers
See (AMR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMR | $118.76 | +8.74% | 1.5B | 57.61 | $2.04 | N/A |
| CNR | $73.61 | +6.56% | 3.8B | 14.97 | $4.84 | +0.27% |
| ARLP | $27.22 | +2.61% | 3.4B | 12.60 | $2.13 | +10.42% |
| HCC | $52.13 | +6.39% | 2.7B | 25.59 | $2.00 | +0.62% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.59% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +0.37% |
| BTU | $14.95 | +5.62% | 1.8B | 5.50 | $2.70 | +2.52% |
| NRP | $98.75 | +0.07% | 1.3B | 9.41 | $10.57 | +4.23% |
| METC | $16.32 | +28.50% | 841.9M | -208.12 | -$0.08 | +3.71% |
| METCB | $11.43 | +30.72% | 796.8M | -128.00 | -$0.08 | +10.38% |
Stock Comparison
AMR vs CNR Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while CNR trades at $73.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs ARLP Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while ARLP trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs HCC Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while HCC trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs CEIX Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CEIX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs ARCH Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs BTU Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while BTU trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas BTU's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to BTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs NRP Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while NRP trades at $98.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs METC Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 841.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while METC trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -208.12. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs METCB Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while METCB trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -128.00. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs SXC Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 728.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while SXC trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SXC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs HNRG Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 679.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while HNRG trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HNRG's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs METCL Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while METCL trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs NC Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 303.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while NC trades at $40.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.
AMR vs AREC Comparison
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $118.76, while AREC trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.61, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.