Arctic Fox Ventures Inc.
Arctic Fox Ventures Inc. (AFX.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AFX.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFX.CN | CA$0.01 | +0.00% | 704.7K | -1.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| FM.TO | CA$23.34 | +5.23% | 19.3B | 66.69 | CA$0.35 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$14.41 | +3.59% | 12.3B | 84.76 | CA$0.17 | +2.25% |
| CS.TO | CA$8.52 | +4.28% | 6.5B | 60.86 | CA$0.14 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | CA$12.70 | +1.52% | 5B | 23.52 | CA$0.54 | +0.16% |
| ERO.TO | CA$19.19 | +3.67% | 2B | 10.05 | CA$1.91 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$13.37 | +1.44% | 1.8B | -11.33 | -CA$1.18 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$4.23 | -0.47% | 1.3B | -20.14 | -CA$0.21 | N/A |
| MARI.TO | CA$9.95 | +1.53% | 1.1B | -55.28 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | CA$5.78 | +8.85% | 835.8M | 10.70 | CA$0.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AFX.CN vs FM.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FM.TO trades at CA$23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 66.69. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check FM.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs LUN.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LUN.TO trades at CA$14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 84.76. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check LUN.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs CS.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CS.TO trades at CA$8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 60.86. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check CS.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs HBM.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HBM.TO trades at CA$12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check HBM.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs ERO.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ERO.TO trades at CA$19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check ERO.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs IE.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while IE.TO trades at CA$13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check IE.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs TKO.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TKO.TO trades at CA$4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check TKO.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs MARI.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MARI.TO trades at CA$9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -55.28. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check MARI.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs AYM.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN and AYM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYM.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs III.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while III.TO trades at CA$3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check III.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs CMMC.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs ASCU.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -32.57. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs ARG.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 352M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ARG.TO trades at CA$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check ARG.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs FDY.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FDY.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check FDY.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs NCU.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check NCU.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs DNT.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN and DNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNT.TO's competition here
AFX.CN vs RCLF.CN Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AFX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
AFX.CN vs CCI.CN Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN and CCI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCI.CN's competition here
AFX.CN vs JUBA.CN Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN and JUBA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JUBA.CN's competition here
AFX.CN vs TRQ.TO Comparison August 2025
AFX.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFX.CN stands at 704.7K. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFX.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, AFX.CN's ROE is -3.14%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFX.CN is less volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFX.CN.Check TRQ.TO's competition here