Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEM.TO | CA$173.92 | +1.26% | 87.9B | 27.05 | CA$6.43 | +1.29% |
| NGT.TO | CA$90.10 | +7.56% | 100.3B | 12.00 | CA$7.51 | +1.55% |
| WPM.TO | CA$128.83 | +0.45% | 58.5B | 69.27 | CA$1.86 | +0.69% |
| ABX.TO | CA$29.84 | +1.57% | 51.3B | 16.58 | CA$1.80 | +2.39% |
| FNV.TO | CA$223.26 | +0.56% | 43B | 50.86 | CA$4.39 | +0.92% |
| K.TO | CA$22.08 | +2.17% | 27.1B | 16.48 | CA$1.34 | +0.76% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$64.82 | +1.63% | 15.6B | 21.32 | CA$3.04 | +3.38% |
| AGI.TO | CA$35.49 | +1.02% | 14.9B | 41.75 | CA$0.85 | +0.39% |
| EDV.TO | CA$42.01 | -0.69% | 10.2B | -73.70 | -CA$0.57 | +3.28% |
Stock Comparison
AEM.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NGT.TO trades at CA$90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NGT.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while WPM.TO trades at CA$128.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 69.27. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check WPM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ABX.TO trades at CA$29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ABX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while FNV.TO trades at CA$223.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 50.86. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check FNV.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs K.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while K.TO trades at CA$22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check K.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NCM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while LUG.TO trades at CA$64.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check LUG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while AGI.TO trades at CA$35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AGI.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -73.70. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check EDV.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check YRI.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OR.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while OR.TO trades at CA$38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 166.52. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check EQX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BTO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ELD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check IMG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NGD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OLA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while OGC.TO trades at CA$19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OGC.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check PRU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while DPM.TO trades at CA$23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check DPM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SSL.TO trades at CA$13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 93.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SSL.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while TXG.TO trades at CA$42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TXG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check KNT.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CEE.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NG.TO trades at CA$7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -20.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ORA.TO trades at CA$34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ORA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while WDO.TO trades at CA$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check WDO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CXB.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check WGX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SEA.TO trades at CA$22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -147.53. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SEA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CG.TO trades at CA$10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OSK.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SBB.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check KRR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -170.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check RUP.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CNL.TO trades at CA$12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CNL.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 846.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ASE.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 767.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MSA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 689.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check IAU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 663M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -68.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AR.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 606.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ORE.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 522.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.30. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GAU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 469.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check PRB.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs MND.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 465.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while MND.TO trades at CA$4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MND.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SGD.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs FDR.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -56.67. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check FDR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -51.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ITH.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 316.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while JAG.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -36.27. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check JAG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check STGO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 253.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SBI.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check DNG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs FF.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check FF.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 160.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check LGD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs G.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while G.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check G.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ELO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BSX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TNX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs LN.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check LN.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs COG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check COG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NEXG.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check STLR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SANU.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MAW.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CBR.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CBR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check XTG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CCM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GHRT.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SIG.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs HMR.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check HMR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VEIN.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs TML.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TML.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check USGD.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs CGC.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CGC.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ESM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ME.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ME.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NOM.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NHK.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BNN.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs VLC.V Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VLC.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NVO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AMM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GRC.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs RISE.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check RISE.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs IRV.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check IRV.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs QIM.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check QIM.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check HWG.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CTOC.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs PME.TO Comparison July 2025
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 87.9B. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$173.92, while PME.TO trades at CA$3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.05, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check PME.TO's competition here