Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited AEM.TO Peers
See (AEM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEM.TO | $148.83 | -8.97% | 75.24B | 22.93 | $6.49 | +1.49% |
| NGT.TO | $71.01 | -5.55% | 79.03B | 11.70 | $6.07 | +1.96% |
| WPM.TO | $110.49 | -7.59% | 50.13B | 68.63 | $1.61 | +0.79% |
| ABX.TO | $25.49 | -5.91% | 43.84B | 15.08 | $1.69 | +2.19% |
| FNV.TO | $221.93 | -5.85% | 42.74B | 56.04 | $3.96 | +0.92% |
| K.TO | $19.16 | -8.72% | 23.58B | 14.09 | $1.36 | +0.87% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $34.81 | -7.74% | 14.64B | 40.48 | $0.86 | +0.40% |
| LUG.TO | $55.89 | -17.55% | 13.44B | 23.00 | $2.43 | +1.41% |
| EDV.TO | $38.85 | -7.21% | 9.38B | -66.98 | -$0.58 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
AEM.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 79.03B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NGT.TO trades at $71.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 50.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while WPM.TO trades at $110.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 43.84B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ABX.TO trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 42.74B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while FNV.TO trades at $221.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 56.04. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs K.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 23.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while K.TO trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while AGI.TO trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 13.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while LUG.TO trades at $55.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.38B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while EDV.TO trades at $38.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -66.98. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while OR.TO trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 261.92. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while BTO.TO trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ELD.TO trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while IMG.TO trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while PRU.TO trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while OLA.TO trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NGD.TO trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while OGC.TO trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while EQX.TO trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while TXG.TO trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SSL.TO trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 81.64. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while DPM.TO trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while KNT.TO trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SSRM.TO trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CXB.TO trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while WDO.TO trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while WGX.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CG.TO trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 37.16. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ORA.TO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while AAUC.TO trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SEA.TO trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -46.80. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NG.TO trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -25.37. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CNL.TO trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -29.04. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while RUP.TO trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -156.67. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 721.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while GTWO.TO trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 683.40M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while MSA.TO trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 571.24M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ASE.CN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 562.56M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ORE.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 558.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while GAU.TO trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 72.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 466.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while MND.TO trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 430.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while FDR.V trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -33.38. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 421.27M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while PRB.TO trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.79. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 305.92M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while IAU.TO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 254.60M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while JAG.TO trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -107.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 250.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SBI.TO trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 226.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ITH.TO trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 217.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while STGO.TO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 215.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 201.76M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while DNG.TO trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 167.45M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while FF.TO trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 166.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 129.48M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while LGD.TO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 127.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while STLR.TO trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 119.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while GHRT.V trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 118.87M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SANU.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 111.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while LN.TO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 107.71M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NEXG.V trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs G.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 102.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while G.TO trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 98.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while BSX.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 88.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while XTG.TO trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 193.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 87.70M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ELO.TO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 86.44M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CBR.V trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 71.88M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while HMR.V trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 68.89M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CCM.TO trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 67.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 57.62M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CGC.V trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 49.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while VEIN.V trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 46.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while USGD.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 35.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ESM.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NVO.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 26.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 23.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while AMM.TO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 21.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while GRC.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 19.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while VAU.V trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 17.98M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while PME.TO trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs IRV.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 15.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while IRV.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 15.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while NOM.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 15.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.
AEM.TO vs ONAU.V Comparison
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 75.24B. In comparison, ONAU.V has a market cap of 12.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at $148.83, while ONAU.V trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ONAU.V's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONAU.V's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ONAU.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.