ACME Solar Holdings Limited
ACME Solar Holdings Limited (ACMESOLAR.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACMESOLAR.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMESOLAR.BO | ₹261.50 | -2.90% | 158.5B | 32.57 | ₹8.03 | +0.15% |
| ADANIGREEN.NS | ₹806.90 | -3.08% | 1.3T | 94.15 | ₹8.57 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.BO | ₹806.80 | -3.08% | 1.3T | 94.36 | ₹8.55 | N/A |
| ENRIN.NS | ₹2,565.50 | -2.43% | 913.6B | 77.53 | ₹33.09 | +0.14% |
| NTPCGREEN.NS | ₹92.32 | -2.88% | 777.9B | 133.80 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| NHPC.NS | ₹73.72 | -3.75% | 740.5B | 47.26 | ₹1.56 | +2.40% |
| NHPC.BO | ₹73.68 | -3.77% | 740.1B | 47.23 | ₹1.56 | +2.40% |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹39.57 | -3.01% | 542.7B | 16.77 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹39.56 | -3.09% | 542.5B | 16.76 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SJVN.BO | ₹63.37 | -4.14% | 249B | 38.64 | ₹1.64 | +2.12% |
Stock Comparison
ACMESOLAR.BO vs ADANIGREEN.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while ADANIGREEN.NS trades at ₹806.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ADANIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 94.15. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADANIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check ADANIGREEN.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs ADANIGREEN.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while ADANIGREEN.BO trades at ₹806.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ADANIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 94.36. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADANIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check ADANIGREEN.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs ENRIN.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, ENRIN.NS has a market cap of 913.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while ENRIN.NS trades at ₹2,565.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ENRIN.NS's P/E ratio is 77.53. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENRIN.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to ENRIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check ENRIN.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs NTPCGREEN.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, NTPCGREEN.NS has a market cap of 777.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while NTPCGREEN.NS trades at ₹92.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas NTPCGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 133.80. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to NTPCGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check NTPCGREEN.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs NHPC.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, NHPC.NS has a market cap of 740.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while NHPC.NS trades at ₹73.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas NHPC.NS's P/E ratio is 47.26. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHPC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to NHPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check NHPC.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs NHPC.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, NHPC.BO has a market cap of 740.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while NHPC.BO trades at ₹73.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas NHPC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHPC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to NHPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check NHPC.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs SUZLON.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 542.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs SUZLON.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 542.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs SJVN.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, SJVN.BO has a market cap of 249B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while SJVN.BO trades at ₹63.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SJVN.BO's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJVN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to SJVN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check SJVN.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs SJVN.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, SJVN.NS has a market cap of 249B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while SJVN.NS trades at ₹63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SJVN.NS's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJVN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to SJVN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check SJVN.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs ACMESOLAR.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.NS has a market cap of 158.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while ACMESOLAR.NS trades at ₹261.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ACMESOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACMESOLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check ACMESOLAR.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹75.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹75.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO and INOXWIND.BO have similar daily volatility (5.59).Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs IWEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, IWEL.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while IWEL.BO trades at ₹10,301.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas IWEL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.28. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IWEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to IWEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check IWEL.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs IWEL.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, IWEL.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while IWEL.NS trades at ₹10,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas IWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IWEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to IWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check IWEL.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs WAAREERTL.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.NS has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while WAAREERTL.NS trades at ₹782.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas WAAREERTL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAAREERTL.NS's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check WAAREERTL.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs KPIGREEN.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while KPIGREEN.BO trades at ₹351.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KPIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to KPIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check KPIGREEN.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs KPIGREEN.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while KPIGREEN.NS trades at ₹351.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KPIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check KPIGREEN.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs INOXGREEN.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.BO has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while INOXGREEN.BO trades at ₹136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas INOXGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 80.95. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOXGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to INOXGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check INOXGREEN.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs INOXGREEN.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.NS has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while INOXGREEN.NS trades at ₹135.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas INOXGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 81.41. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOXGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to INOXGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check INOXGREEN.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs RTNPOWER.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.BO has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while RTNPOWER.BO trades at ₹7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas RTNPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTNPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to RTNPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check RTNPOWER.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs RTNPOWER.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while RTNPOWER.NS trades at ₹7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas RTNPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTNPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check RTNPOWER.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs BFUTILITIE.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while BFUTILITIE.NS trades at ₹371.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas BFUTILITIE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs BFUTILITIE.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while BFUTILITIE.BO trades at ₹370.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas BFUTILITIE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs INDOWIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, INDOWIND.BO has a market cap of 902M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while INDOWIND.BO trades at ₹7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas INDOWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 78.56. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOWIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check INDOWIND.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs INDOWIND.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, INDOWIND.NS has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while INDOWIND.NS trades at ₹7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas INDOWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 78.44. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOWIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check INDOWIND.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs KARMAENG.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, KARMAENG.BO has a market cap of 411.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while KARMAENG.BO trades at ₹35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KARMAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KARMAENG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to KARMAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check KARMAENG.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs KARMAENG.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, KARMAENG.NS has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while KARMAENG.NS trades at ₹34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KARMAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KARMAENG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check KARMAENG.NS's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs SMEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, SMEL.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while SMEL.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SMEL.BO's P/E ratio is 437.50. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is more volatile compared to SMEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check SMEL.BO's competition here
ACMESOLAR.BO vs KPIGLOBAL.NS Comparison April 2026
ACMESOLAR.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMESOLAR.BO stands at 158.5B. In comparison, KPIGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACMESOLAR.BO is priced at ₹261.50, while KPIGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMESOLAR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KPIGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMESOLAR.BO is less volatile compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMESOLAR.BO.Check KPIGLOBAL.NS's competition here