Advanced Bitcoin Technologies AG
Advanced Bitcoin Technologies AG (ABT.DU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABT.DU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABT.DU | €0.12 | -7.69% | 2.5M | -12.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| MSF.F | €322.75 | +0.78% | 2.4T | 23.15 | €13.94 | +0.92% |
| MSF.DE | €321.20 | +0.30% | 2.4T | 23.04 | €13.94 | +0.93% |
| ORC.DE | €126.18 | -0.03% | 362.9B | 26.23 | €4.81 | +1.37% |
| PTX.F | €127.44 | +0.16% | 292B | 236.00 | €0.54 | N/A |
| ADB.DE | €209.45 | +0.22% | 85.5B | 14.13 | €14.82 | N/A |
| BZF1.DE | €139.80 | -1.55% | 60.4B | 45.99 | €3.04 | N/A |
| SQ3.F | €51.59 | +0.43% | 31.5B | 28.50 | €1.81 | N/A |
| VRS.DE | €225.75 | +4.27% | 20.8B | 29.78 | €7.58 | +1.18% |
| PMTA.DE | €123.52 | +0.31% | 14.7B | 21.08 | €5.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABT.DU vs MSF.F Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MSF.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while MSF.F trades at €322.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MSF.F's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSF.F's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to MSF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check MSF.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs MSF.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MSF.DE has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while MSF.DE trades at €321.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MSF.DE's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSF.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to MSF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check MSF.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs ORC.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ORC.DE has a market cap of 362.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while ORC.DE trades at €126.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ORC.DE's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORC.DE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to ORC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check ORC.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs PTX.F Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PTX.F has a market cap of 292B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while PTX.F trades at €127.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PTX.F's P/E ratio is 236.00. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTX.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to PTX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check PTX.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs ADB.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ADB.DE has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while ADB.DE trades at €209.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ADB.DE's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADB.DE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to ADB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check ADB.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs BZF1.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BZF1.DE has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while BZF1.DE trades at €139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BZF1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BZF1.DE's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU and BZF1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZF1.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs SQ3.F Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SQ3.F has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while SQ3.F trades at €51.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SQ3.F's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SQ3.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to SQ3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SQ3.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs VRS.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VRS.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while VRS.DE trades at €225.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VRS.DE's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRS.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to VRS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check VRS.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs PMTA.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PMTA.DE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while PMTA.DE trades at €123.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PMTA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMTA.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to PMTA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check PMTA.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs AK3.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AK3.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while AK3.DE trades at €95.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AK3.DE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AK3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to AK3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check AK3.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs KKS.F Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, KKS.F has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while KKS.F trades at €64.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas KKS.F's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KKS.F's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to KKS.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check KKS.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs IOS.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IOS.DE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while IOS.DE trades at €25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IOS.DE's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IOS.DE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to IOS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check IOS.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs SOW.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SOW.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while SOW.DE trades at €37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SOW.DE's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOW.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to SOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SOW.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs 3L7A.F Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, 3L7A.F has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while 3L7A.F trades at €76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas 3L7A.F's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3L7A.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to 3L7A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check 3L7A.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs SUSE.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SUSE.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while SUSE.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SUSE.DE's P/E ratio is -57.32. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUSE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to SUSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SUSE.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs YSN.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, YSN.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while YSN.DE trades at €180.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas YSN.DE's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YSN.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to YSN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check YSN.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs NFN.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NFN.DE has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while NFN.DE trades at €3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NFN.DE's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NFN.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to NFN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check NFN.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs EXL.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EXL.DE has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while EXL.DE trades at €1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EXL.DE's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EXL.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to EXL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check EXL.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs CYR.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CYR.DE has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while CYR.DE trades at €1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CYR.DE's P/E ratio is -21.56. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CYR.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to CYR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check CYR.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs R1B.F Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, R1B.F has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while R1B.F trades at €4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas R1B.F's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to R1B.F's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to R1B.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check R1B.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs INW.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, INW.DE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while INW.DE trades at €3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas INW.DE's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INW.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU and INW.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INW.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs UMDK.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, UMDK.DE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while UMDK.DE trades at €0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas UMDK.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UMDK.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to UMDK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check UMDK.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs O5H.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, O5H.DE has a market cap of 400.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while O5H.DE trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas O5H.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to O5H.DE's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to O5H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check O5H.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs INW1.DE Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, INW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while INW1.DE trades at €2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas INW1.DE's P/E ratio is -61.94. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INW1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to INW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check INW1.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs 50C.MU Comparison April 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 2.5M. In comparison, 50C.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.12, while 50C.MU trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas 50C.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 50C.MU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to 50C.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check 50C.MU's competition here