Able View Inc.
Able View Inc. (ABLVW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABLVW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABLVW | $0.02 | -2.04% | 1.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OMC | $80.55 | -0.49% | 16.1B | 12.28 | $6.78 | +3.50% |
| IPG | $24.57 | -1.96% | 8.9B | 16.83 | $1.46 | +5.37% |
| QMMM | $119.40 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -702.35 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| WPP | $18.21 | -3.09% | 4.1B | 7.98 | $2.36 | +10.74% |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| CMPR | $69.95 | -4.78% | 1.8B | 73.71 | $0.98 | N/A |
| MGNI | $11.55 | -5.45% | 1.8B | 29.83 | $0.41 | N/A |
| IAS | $10.34 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 36.93 | $0.28 | N/A |
| ZD | $29.87 | -1.94% | 1.3B | 12.21 | $2.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABLVW vs OMC Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while OMC trades at $80.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check OMC's competition here
ABLVW vs IPG Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while IPG trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check IPG's competition here
ABLVW vs QMMM Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while QMMM trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -702.35. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check QMMM's competition here
ABLVW vs WPP Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while WPP trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check WPP's competition here
ABLVW vs MDCA Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MDCA's competition here
ABLVW vs CMPR Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CMPR trades at $69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 73.71. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CMPR's competition here
ABLVW vs MGNI Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MGNI trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MGNI's competition here
ABLVW vs IAS Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while IAS trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check IAS's competition here
ABLVW vs ZD Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ZD trades at $29.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ZD's competition here
ABLVW vs DLX Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while DLX trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check DLX's competition here
ABLVW vs CCO Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CCO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CCO's competition here
ABLVW vs STGW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while STGW trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is 66.14. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check STGW's competition here
ABLVW vs EEX Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 928.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while EEX trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 117.25. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check EEX's competition here
ABLVW vs CRTO Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 896.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CRTO trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CRTO's competition here
ABLVW vs BOMN Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check BOMN's competition here
ABLVW vs MNTN Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MNTN has a market cap of 731.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MNTN trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTN's P/E ratio is -76.85. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MNTN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MNTN's competition here
ABLVW vs QNST Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 656.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while QNST trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check QNST's competition here
ABLVW vs CTV Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CTV's competition here
ABLVW vs QUOT Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check QUOT's competition here
ABLVW vs BOC Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while BOC trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is -1220.00. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check BOC's competition here
ABLVW vs NCMI Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 319M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while NCMI trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check NCMI's competition here
ABLVW vs ADTH Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ADTH's competition here
ABLVW vs ADV Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 202.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ADV trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ADV's competition here
ABLVW vs NEXN Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while NEXN trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check NEXN's competition here
ABLVW vs TRMR Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TRMR's competition here
ABLVW vs CHR Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CHR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CHR's competition here
ABLVW vs TSQ Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TSQ trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TSQ's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TSQ's competition here
ABLVW vs ATY Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ATY's competition here
ABLVW vs WIMI Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while WIMI trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check WIMI's competition here
ABLVW vs ICLK Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ICLK's competition here
ABLVW vs STCN Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check STCN's competition here
ABLVW vs XNET Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while XNET trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -117.40. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XNET's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check XNET's competition here
ABLVW vs MCHX Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MCHX trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MCHX's competition here
ABLVW vs FLNT Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while FLNT trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check FLNT's competition here
ABLVW vs TZOO Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TZOO trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TZOO's competition here
ABLVW vs SDM Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while SDM trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check SDM's competition here
ABLVW vs CDLX Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CDLX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CDLX's competition here
ABLVW vs ADTHW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ADTHW's competition here
ABLVW vs TZUP Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TZUP has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TZUP trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZUP's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TZUP's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TZUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TZUP's competition here
ABLVW vs GSMG Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check GSMG's competition here
ABLVW vs ABLV Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ABLV trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ABLV's competition here
ABLVW vs MOXC Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MOXC's competition here
ABLVW vs SWAG Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while SWAG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -23.12. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check SWAG's competition here
ABLVW vs INUV Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while INUV trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check INUV's competition here
ABLVW vs ACCS Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ACCS trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ACCS's competition here
ABLVW vs HHS Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while HHS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check HHS's competition here
ABLVW vs MCTR Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MCTR trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCTR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MCTR's competition here
ABLVW vs MOBQ Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MOBQ trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MOBQ's competition here
ABLVW vs TJGC Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TJGC has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TJGC trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJGC's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TJGC's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TJGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TJGC's competition here
ABLVW vs ISIG Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ISIG's competition here
ABLVW vs FTRK Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FTRK has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while FTRK trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRK's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FTRK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to FTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check FTRK's competition here
ABLVW vs HAO Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while HAO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check HAO's competition here
ABLVW vs KUST Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KUST has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while KUST trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUST's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KUST's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to KUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check KUST's competition here
ABLVW vs DMS Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check DMS's competition here
ABLVW vs DRCTW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check DRCTW's competition here
ABLVW vs LDWY Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while LDWY trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check LDWY's competition here
ABLVW vs YDKG Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, YDKG has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while YDKG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDKG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YDKG's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to YDKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check YDKG's competition here
ABLVW vs EDHL Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while EDHL trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check EDHL's competition here
ABLVW vs BAOS Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while BAOS trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check BAOS's competition here
ABLVW vs VSME Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while VSME trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check VSME's competition here
ABLVW vs MGOL Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -21.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MGOL's competition here
ABLVW vs STRNW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STRNW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check STRNW's competition here
ABLVW vs CNET Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while CNET trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check CNET's competition here
ABLVW vs ADVWW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ADVWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ADVWW's competition here
ABLVW vs SWAGW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while SWAGW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check SWAGW's competition here
ABLVW vs STFS Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while STFS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STFS's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check STFS's competition here
ABLVW vs DRCT Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 720.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while DRCT trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check DRCT's competition here
ABLVW vs TRKAW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TRKAW's competition here
ABLVW vs SRAX Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 353.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while SRAX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check SRAX's competition here
ABLVW vs MOBQW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 44.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check MOBQW's competition here
ABLVW vs GSMGW Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check GSMGW's competition here
ABLVW vs DMS-WT Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check DMS-WT's competition here
ABLVW vs TRKA Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check TRKA's competition here
ABLVW vs ZDVSV Comparison February 2026
ABLVW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLVW stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLVW is priced at $0.02, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLVW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, ABLVW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLVW is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLVW.Check ZDVSV's competition here