Dadelo S.A.
Dadelo S.A. (91N0.SG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (91N0.SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91N0.SG | €16.60 | +2.47% | 193.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | €182.26 | -0.40% | 2T | 29.26 | €6.23 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | €13.20 | -0.98% | 253.1B | 21.73 | €0.61 | +1.64% |
| AHLA.F | €105.60 | -1.31% | 251.6B | 21.55 | €4.89 | +1.62% |
| AHLA.DE | €105.40 | -1.31% | 244.6B | 21.55 | €4.89 | +1.62% |
| IXD1.DE | €50.70 | -1.05% | 158B | 25.35 | €2.00 | +2.68% |
| MLB1.DE | €1,490.20 | +0.89% | 75.5B | 43.42 | €34.32 | N/A |
| EBA.DE | €81.28 | +1.26% | 36.4B | 21.91 | €3.71 | +1.25% |
| 013A.F | €24.70 | -1.20% | 34B | 15.21 | €1.63 | +3.56% |
| ZAL.DE | €21.00 | -1.13% | 5.4B | 25.61 | €0.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
91N0.SG vs AMZ.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while AMZ.DE trades at €182.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 2RR.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 253.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while 2RR.F trades at €13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 2RR.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs AHLA.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while AHLA.F trades at €105.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check AHLA.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs AHLA.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 244.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while AHLA.DE trades at €105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs IXD1.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while IXD1.DE trades at €50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check IXD1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs MLB1.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while MLB1.DE trades at €1,490.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs EBA.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while EBA.DE trades at €81.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check EBA.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 013A.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while 013A.F trades at €24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 013A.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs ZAL.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while ZAL.DE trades at €21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs DHER.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while DHER.DE trades at €16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check DHER.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 3E2.BE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while 3E2.BE trades at €47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 3E2.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while 3E2.F trades at €44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 3E2.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs 3E2.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while 3E2.DE trades at €44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ZO1.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs CEC.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while CEC.DE trades at €4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 421.50. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check CEC.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs YOU.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while YOU.DE trades at €6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check YOU.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs YOU.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while YOU.F trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check YOU.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs DOU.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, DOU.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while DOU.F trades at €10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOU.F's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DOU.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to DOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check DOU.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs 8WZ.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 732.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs SNH.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check SNH.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs G5NA.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs H24.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check H24.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
91N0.SG vs BIKE.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while BIKE.F trades at €2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BIKE.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs BIKE.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -22.69. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs FSNT.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ART.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ART.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs MRX.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while MRX.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check MRX.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs MRX.F Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while MRX.F trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check MRX.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs BBY.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BBY.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ECF.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while ECF.DE trades at €2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -44.80. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ECF.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ADD.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ADD.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs WDL1.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, WDL1.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while WDL1.DE trades at €0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDL1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDL1.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to WDL1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check WDL1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs BTBB.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs CEC1.DE Comparison April 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 193.8M. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.60, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check CEC1.DE's competition here