Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 8296.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 8296.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8296.HK | HK$0.15 | +0.00% | 14.2M | -1.72 | -HK$0.09 | N/A |
| 8603.HK | HK$14.30 | +3.62% | 11.7B | 156.71 | HK$0.09 | N/A |
| 0308.HK | HK$1.17 | +1.75% | 6.3B | -143.48 | -HK$0.01 | +30.22% |
| 1448.HK | HK$2.64 | +0.00% | 6B | -28.95 | -HK$0.09 | +6.74% |
| 1027.HK | HK$3.00 | -12.66% | 1.4B | 119.78 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1161.HK | HK$1.29 | -7.19% | 929M | 11.43 | HK$0.12 | +5.68% |
| 2779.HK | HK$0.36 | +4.35% | 595.2M | 1.66 | HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 6966.HK | HK$0.48 | -3.06% | 475M | -63.08 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 2683.HK | HK$1.09 | +0.46% | 445.4M | 5.92 | HK$0.18 | +11.01% |
| 0213.HK | HK$0.35 | +2.94% | 319.4M | 7.14 | HK$0.05 | +1.43% |
Stock Comparison
Fameglow Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8603.HK)
8296.HK vs 8603.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 8603.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 8603.HK trades at HK$14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 8603.HK's P/E ratio is 156.71. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 8603.HK's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 8603.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 8603.HK's competition here
China Travel International Investment Hong Kong Limited (HKSE: 0308.HK)
8296.HK vs 0308.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 0308.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 0308.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 0308.HK's P/E ratio is -143.48. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0308.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 0308.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 0308.HK's competition here
Fu Shou Yuan International Group Limited (HKSE: 1448.HK)
8296.HK vs 1448.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 1448.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 1448.HK trades at HK$2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 1448.HK's P/E ratio is -28.95. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1448.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 1448.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 1448.HK's competition here
Asia Strategy Digit Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1027.HK)
8296.HK vs 1027.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 1027.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 1027.HK trades at HK$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 1027.HK's P/E ratio is 119.78. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1027.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 1027.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 1027.HK's competition here
Water Oasis Group Limited (HKSE: 1161.HK)
8296.HK vs 1161.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 1161.HK has a market cap of 929M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 1161.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 1161.HK's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 1161.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 1161.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 1161.HK's competition here
China Xinhua Education Group Limited (HKSE: 2779.HK)
8296.HK vs 2779.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 2779.HK has a market cap of 595.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 2779.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 2779.HK's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 2779.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 2779.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 2779.HK's competition here
China Wan Tong Yuan (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 6966.HK)
8296.HK vs 6966.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 6966.HK has a market cap of 475M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 6966.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 6966.HK's P/E ratio is -63.08. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 6966.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 6966.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 6966.HK's competition here
Wah Sun Handbags International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2683.HK)
8296.HK vs 2683.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 2683.HK has a market cap of 445.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 2683.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 2683.HK's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 2683.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 2683.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 2683.HK's competition here
National Electronics Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0213.HK)
8296.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 0213.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 0213.HK's competition here
Anxian Yuan China Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0922.HK)
8296.HK vs 0922.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 0922.HK has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 0922.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 0922.HK's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0922.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 0922.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 0922.HK's competition here
Lemo Services Co., Ltd (HKSE: 2539.HK)
8296.HK vs 2539.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 2539.HK has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 2539.HK trades at HK$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 2539.HK's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 2539.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 2539.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 2539.HK's competition here
Telecom Service One Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3997.HK)
8296.HK vs 3997.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 3997.HK has a market cap of 211.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 3997.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 3997.HK's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 3997.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 3997.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 3997.HK's competition here
Modern Healthcare Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0919.HK)
8296.HK vs 0919.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 0919.HK has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 0919.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 0919.HK's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0919.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 0919.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 0919.HK's competition here
Century Legend (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0079.HK)
8296.HK vs 0079.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 0079.HK has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 0079.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 0079.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 0079.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is less volatile compared to 0079.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 0079.HK's competition here
Flydoo Tech-old (HKSE: 8557.HK)
8296.HK vs 8557.HK Comparison August 2026
Sino-Life Group Limited (HKSE: 8296.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8296.HK stands at 14.2M. In comparison, 8557.HK has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8296.HK is priced at HK$0.15 on the HKSE, while 8557.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8296.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas 8557.HK's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, 8296.HK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 8557.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8296.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8557.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8296.HK.Check 8557.HK's competition here