China Xinhua Education Group Limited
China Xinhua Education Group Limited (2779.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2779.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2779.HK | HK$0.43 | +2.41% | 683.6M | 1.77 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 9901.HK | HK$37.96 | -0.11% | 60.4B | 17.99 | HK$2.11 | +2.48% |
| 0667.HK | HK$4.97 | +0.20% | 11B | 12.74 | HK$0.39 | +4.43% |
| 0839.HK | HK$2.01 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 4.90 | HK$0.41 | N/A |
| 1773.HK | HK$1.58 | +1.28% | 3.2B | 3.95 | HK$0.40 | +6.65% |
| 1851.HK | HK$6.41 | -4.04% | 3.2B | 16.87 | HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 0032.HK | HK$8.10 | -0.37% | 3B | 4.29 | HK$1.89 | +5.19% |
| 3978.HK | HK$3.30 | +0.30% | 2.5B | 7.33 | HK$0.45 | +10.85% |
| 1890.HK | HK$0.95 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 2.21 | HK$0.43 | +13.68% |
| 6169.HK | HK$0.40 | -1.23% | 1.7B | 1.60 | HK$0.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2779.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 9901.HK trades at HK$37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 9901.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0667.HK trades at HK$4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0667.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0839.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1773.HK trades at HK$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1773.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1851.HK trades at HK$6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1851.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 0032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0032.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 3978.HK trades at HK$3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 3978.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1890.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1890.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6169.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1935.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1935.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 2469.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2469.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 2175.HK trades at HK$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2175.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1969.HK trades at HK$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1969.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1765.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 2001.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2001.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1593.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 869.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -20.43. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1082.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 776.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0382.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0382.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1525.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1525.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 699.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1769.HK trades at HK$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1769.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 624M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1756.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 558.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1317.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 506.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1569.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 474.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1565.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1563.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1563.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1752.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1871.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 213.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6913.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1449.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1775.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6068.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1598.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8160.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1758.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8363.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8417.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2371.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison May 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 683.6M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.77, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8055.HK's competition here