China Xinhua Education Group Limited
China Xinhua Education Group Limited (2779.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2779.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2779.HK | HK$0.48 | -1.03% | 772.1M | 2.00 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 9901.HK | HK$42.36 | +2.37% | 67.4B | 20.08 | HK$2.11 | +1.14% |
| 0667.HK | HK$5.22 | +2.35% | 11.6B | 13.38 | HK$0.39 | +4.31% |
| 0839.HK | HK$2.42 | +2.11% | 6.8B | 5.90 | HK$0.41 | N/A |
| 1773.HK | HK$1.69 | +3.68% | 3.4B | 4.12 | HK$0.41 | +6.45% |
| 0032.HK | HK$8.37 | +0.24% | 3.1B | 4.42 | HK$1.89 | +5.02% |
| 3978.HK | HK$3.27 | +0.31% | 2.5B | 7.43 | HK$0.44 | +7.39% |
| 1851.HK | HK$4.89 | +2.30% | 2.4B | 12.87 | HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 1890.HK | HK$1.15 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 2.67 | HK$0.43 | +11.30% |
| 2469.HK | HK$0.88 | -1.12% | 1.9B | 8.80 | HK$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2779.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 9901.HK trades at HK$42.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 9901.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 0667.HK trades at HK$5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0667.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0839.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1773.HK trades at HK$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1773.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 0032.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0032.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 3978.HK trades at HK$3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 3978.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1851.HK trades at HK$4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1851.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1890.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1890.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 2469.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2469.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6169.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1935.HK trades at HK$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1935.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1969.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1969.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 2175.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2175.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 2001.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2001.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1765.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1593.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 0382.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0382.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -21.14. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1082.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 881.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1769.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1769.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1525.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 775.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1317.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 648M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1756.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1756.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 565.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1569.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 550.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1565.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6913.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1563.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1563.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1775.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1752.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1871.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1449.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6068.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1598.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1758.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 8160.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8160.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8363.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8417.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 2371.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2371.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison April 2026
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 772.1M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.48, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.00, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8055.HK's competition here