Nihon Yamamura Glass Co., Ltd. (5210.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (5210.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5210.T | ¥2,764.00 | +0.69% | 28.3B | 8.64 | ¥319.79 | +5.46% |
| 5901.T | ¥4,121.00 | -0.15% | 619.7B | 11.40 | ¥361.53 | +3.20% |
| 3941.T | ¥1,401.00 | -2.06% | 347.5B | 16.54 | ¥84.69 | +2.80% |
| 7947.T | ¥2,573.00 | -1.04% | 208.1B | 14.00 | ¥183.82 | +2.81% |
| 7864.T | ¥2,837.00 | -0.21% | 151.3B | 7.32 | ¥387.50 | +2.85% |
| 7917.T | ¥1,350.00 | +0.97% | 96.7B | 12.85 | ¥105.09 | +2.69% |
| 3950.T | ¥1,334.00 | -1.91% | 74.2B | 12.46 | ¥107.03 | +3.04% |
| 7942.T | ¥2,575.00 | -0.77% | 67.5B | 10.22 | ¥251.97 | +3.47% |
| 3946.T | ¥3,770.00 | -0.26% | 62.2B | 8.44 | ¥446.42 | +3.44% |
| 7504.T | ¥3,110.00 | +0.81% | 60.8B | 16.13 | ¥192.81 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
5210.T vs 5901.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 5901.T has a market cap of 619.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 5901.T trades at ¥4,121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 5901.T's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5901.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 5901.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 5901.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3941.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3941.T has a market cap of 347.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3941.T trades at ¥1,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3941.T's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3941.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 3941.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3941.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7947.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7947.T has a market cap of 208.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7947.T trades at ¥2,573.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7947.T's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7947.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 7947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7947.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7864.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7864.T has a market cap of 151.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7864.T trades at ¥2,837.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7864.T's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7864.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 7864.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7864.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7917.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7917.T has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7917.T trades at ¥1,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7917.T's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7917.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 7917.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7917.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3950.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3950.T has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3950.T trades at ¥1,334.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3950.T's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3950.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 3950.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3950.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7942.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7942.T has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7942.T trades at ¥2,575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7942.T's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7942.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 7942.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7942.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3946.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3946.T has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3946.T trades at ¥3,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3946.T's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3946.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 3946.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3946.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7504.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7504.T has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7504.T trades at ¥3,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7504.T's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7504.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 7504.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7504.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7482.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7482.T has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7482.T trades at ¥1,338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7482.T's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7482.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 7482.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7482.T's competition here
5210.T vs 5902.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 5902.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 5902.T trades at ¥2,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 5902.T's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5902.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 5902.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 5902.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3947.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3947.T has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3947.T trades at ¥2,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3947.T's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3947.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 3947.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3947.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3951.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3951.T has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3951.T trades at ¥855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3951.T's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3951.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 3951.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3951.T's competition here
5210.T vs 4994.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 4994.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 4994.T trades at ¥2,336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 4994.T's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4994.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 4994.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 4994.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3954.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3954.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3954.T trades at ¥2,830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3954.T's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3954.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 3954.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3954.T's competition here
5210.T vs 5204.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 5204.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 5204.T trades at ¥2,963.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 5204.T's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5204.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 5204.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 5204.T's competition here
5210.T vs 4248.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 4248.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 4248.T trades at ¥876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 4248.T's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4248.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 4248.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 4248.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3943.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3943.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3943.T trades at ¥1,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3943.T's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3943.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 3943.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3943.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7923.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7923.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7923.T trades at ¥1,178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7923.T's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7923.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 7923.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7923.T's competition here
5210.T vs 9385.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 9385.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 9385.T trades at ¥708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 9385.T's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9385.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 9385.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 9385.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3359.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3359.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3359.T trades at ¥502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3359.T's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3359.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 3359.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3359.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7131.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7131.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7131.T trades at ¥3,470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7131.T's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7131.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 7131.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7131.T's competition here
5210.T vs 4690.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 4690.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 4690.T trades at ¥2,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 4690.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4690.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 4690.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 4690.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3944.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3944.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3944.T trades at ¥2,542.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3944.T's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3944.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 3944.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3944.T's competition here
5210.T vs 7800.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 7800.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 7800.T trades at ¥855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 7800.T's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7800.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 7800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 7800.T's competition here
5210.T vs 3953.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 3953.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 3953.T trades at ¥737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 3953.T's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3953.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is more volatile compared to 3953.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 3953.T's competition here
5210.T vs 5905.T Comparison June 2026
5210.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5210.T stands at 28.3B. In comparison, 5905.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5210.T is priced at ¥2,764.00, while 5905.T trades at ¥1,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5210.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas 5905.T's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, 5210.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5905.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5210.T is less volatile compared to 5905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5210.T.Check 5905.T's competition here