Asahi Printing Co.,Ltd. (3951.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3951.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3951.T | ¥855.00 | +0.47% | 17.5B | 11.17 | ¥75.77 | +4.49% |
| 5901.T | ¥4,121.00 | +0.37% | 620.6B | 11.41 | ¥361.58 | +3.20% |
| 3941.T | ¥1,401.00 | -1.62% | 354.8B | 16.90 | ¥84.64 | +2.80% |
| 7947.T | ¥2,573.00 | -2.24% | 210.3B | 14.14 | ¥183.90 | +2.81% |
| 7864.T | ¥2,837.00 | +3.31% | 151.7B | 7.34 | ¥387.40 | +2.85% |
| 7917.T | ¥1,350.00 | +2.20% | 95.8B | 12.72 | ¥105.10 | +2.69% |
| 3950.T | ¥1,334.00 | -1.19% | 75.6B | 12.69 | ¥107.14 | +3.04% |
| 7942.T | ¥2,575.00 | -1.68% | 68B | 10.30 | ¥251.86 | +3.47% |
| 3946.T | ¥3,770.00 | +0.00% | 62.4B | 8.47 | ¥446.33 | +3.44% |
| 7504.T | ¥3,110.00 | +1.80% | 60.3B | 16.01 | ¥192.75 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
3951.T vs 5901.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 5901.T has a market cap of 620.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 5901.T trades at ¥4,121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 5901.T's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5901.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 5901.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 5901.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3941.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3941.T has a market cap of 354.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3941.T trades at ¥1,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3941.T's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3941.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 3941.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3941.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7947.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7947.T has a market cap of 210.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7947.T trades at ¥2,573.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7947.T's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7947.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7947.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7864.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7864.T has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7864.T trades at ¥2,837.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7864.T's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7864.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7864.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7864.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7917.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7917.T has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7917.T trades at ¥1,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7917.T's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7917.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7917.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7917.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3950.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3950.T has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3950.T trades at ¥1,334.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3950.T's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3950.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 3950.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3950.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7942.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7942.T has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7942.T trades at ¥2,575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7942.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7942.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7942.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7942.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3946.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3946.T has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3946.T trades at ¥3,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3946.T's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3946.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 3946.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3946.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7504.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7504.T has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7504.T trades at ¥3,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7504.T's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7504.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7504.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7504.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7482.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7482.T has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7482.T trades at ¥1,338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7482.T's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7482.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7482.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7482.T's competition here
3951.T vs 5902.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 5902.T has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 5902.T trades at ¥2,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 5902.T's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5902.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 5902.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 5902.T's competition here
3951.T vs 5210.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 5210.T has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 5210.T trades at ¥2,764.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 5210.T's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5210.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 5210.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 5210.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3947.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3947.T has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3947.T trades at ¥2,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3947.T's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3947.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 3947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3947.T's competition here
3951.T vs 4994.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 4994.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 4994.T trades at ¥2,336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 4994.T's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4994.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 4994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 4994.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3954.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3954.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3954.T trades at ¥2,830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3954.T's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3954.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 3954.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3954.T's competition here
3951.T vs 5204.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 5204.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 5204.T trades at ¥2,963.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 5204.T's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5204.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 5204.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 5204.T's competition here
3951.T vs 4248.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 4248.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 4248.T trades at ¥876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 4248.T's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4248.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 4248.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 4248.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3943.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3943.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3943.T trades at ¥1,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3943.T's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3943.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 3943.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3943.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7923.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7923.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7923.T trades at ¥1,178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7923.T's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7923.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 7923.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7923.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3359.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3359.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3359.T trades at ¥502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3359.T's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3359.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 3359.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3359.T's competition here
3951.T vs 9385.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 9385.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 9385.T trades at ¥708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 9385.T's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9385.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 9385.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 9385.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7131.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7131.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7131.T trades at ¥3,470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7131.T's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7131.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7131.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7131.T's competition here
3951.T vs 4690.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 4690.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 4690.T trades at ¥2,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 4690.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 4690.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 4690.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 4690.T's competition here
3951.T vs 7800.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 7800.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 7800.T trades at ¥855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 7800.T's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7800.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 7800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 7800.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3953.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3953.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3953.T trades at ¥737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3953.T's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3953.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is more volatile compared to 3953.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3953.T's competition here
3951.T vs 3944.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 3944.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 3944.T trades at ¥2,542.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 3944.T's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3944.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 3944.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 3944.T's competition here
3951.T vs 5905.T Comparison June 2026
3951.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3951.T stands at 17.5B. In comparison, 5905.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3951.T is priced at ¥855.00, while 5905.T trades at ¥1,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3951.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.17, whereas 5905.T's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, 3951.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5905.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3951.T is less volatile compared to 5905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3951.T.Check 5905.T's competition here