Takemoto Yohki Co., Ltd. (4248.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4248.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4248.T | ¥874.00 | -0.23% | 10.5B | 13.72 | ¥63.69 | +4.12% |
| 5901.T | ¥4,081.00 | -0.97% | 615.9B | 11.32 | ¥361.82 | +3.22% |
| 3941.T | ¥1,410.00 | +0.64% | 348.4B | 16.57 | ¥84.76 | +2.85% |
| 7947.T | ¥2,614.00 | +1.59% | 209.8B | 14.10 | ¥183.97 | +2.81% |
| 7864.T | ¥2,827.00 | -0.35% | 150.2B | 7.27 | ¥387.42 | +2.88% |
| 7917.T | ¥1,325.00 | -1.85% | 94.3B | 12.51 | ¥105.16 | +2.74% |
| 3950.T | ¥1,326.00 | -0.60% | 73.6B | 12.36 | ¥107.03 | +3.12% |
| 7942.T | ¥2,520.00 | -2.14% | 65.9B | 9.98 | ¥251.84 | +3.58% |
| 3946.T | ¥3,780.00 | +0.27% | 62.3B | 8.46 | ¥446.42 | +3.44% |
| 7504.T | ¥3,140.00 | +0.96% | 60.9B | 16.16 | ¥192.81 | +3.72% |
Stock Comparison
4248.T vs 5901.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 5901.T has a market cap of 615.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 5901.T trades at ¥4,081.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 5901.T's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5901.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 5901.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 5901.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3941.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3941.T has a market cap of 348.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3941.T trades at ¥1,410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3941.T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3941.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 3941.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3941.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7947.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7947.T has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7947.T trades at ¥2,614.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7947.T's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7947.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 7947.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7947.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7864.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7864.T has a market cap of 150.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7864.T trades at ¥2,827.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7864.T's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7864.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7864.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7864.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7917.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7917.T has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7917.T trades at ¥1,325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7917.T's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7917.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7917.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7917.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3950.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3950.T has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3950.T trades at ¥1,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3950.T's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3950.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 3950.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3950.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7942.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7942.T has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7942.T trades at ¥2,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7942.T's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7942.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7942.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7942.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3946.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3946.T has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3946.T trades at ¥3,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3946.T's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3946.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 3946.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3946.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7504.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7504.T has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7504.T trades at ¥3,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7504.T's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7504.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7504.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7504.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7482.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7482.T has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7482.T trades at ¥1,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7482.T's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7482.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7482.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7482.T's competition here
4248.T vs 5902.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 5902.T has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 5902.T trades at ¥2,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 5902.T's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5902.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 5902.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 5902.T's competition here
4248.T vs 5210.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 5210.T has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 5210.T trades at ¥2,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 5210.T's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5210.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 5210.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 5210.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3947.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3947.T has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3947.T trades at ¥2,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3947.T's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3947.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 3947.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3947.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3951.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3951.T has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3951.T trades at ¥860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3951.T's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3951.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 3951.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3951.T's competition here
4248.T vs 4994.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 4994.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 4994.T trades at ¥2,372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 4994.T's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4994.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 4994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 4994.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3954.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3954.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3954.T trades at ¥2,815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3954.T's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3954.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 3954.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3954.T's competition here
4248.T vs 5204.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 5204.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 5204.T trades at ¥3,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 5204.T's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5204.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 5204.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 5204.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3943.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3943.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3943.T trades at ¥1,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3943.T's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3943.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 3943.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3943.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7923.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7923.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7923.T trades at ¥1,178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7923.T's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7923.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 7923.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7923.T's competition here
4248.T vs 9385.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 9385.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 9385.T trades at ¥701.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 9385.T's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9385.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 9385.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 9385.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3359.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3359.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3359.T trades at ¥508.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3359.T's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3359.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 3359.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3359.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7131.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7131.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7131.T trades at ¥3,465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7131.T's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7131.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7131.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7131.T's competition here
4248.T vs 4690.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 4690.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 4690.T trades at ¥2,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 4690.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4690.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 4690.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 4690.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3944.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3944.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3944.T trades at ¥2,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3944.T's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3944.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 3944.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3944.T's competition here
4248.T vs 7800.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 7800.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 7800.T trades at ¥860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 7800.T's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7800.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 7800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 7800.T's competition here
4248.T vs 3953.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 3953.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 3953.T trades at ¥737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 3953.T's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3953.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is more volatile compared to 3953.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 3953.T's competition here
4248.T vs 5905.T Comparison June 2026
4248.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4248.T stands at 10.5B. In comparison, 5905.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4248.T is priced at ¥874.00, while 5905.T trades at ¥1,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4248.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.72, whereas 5905.T's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, 4248.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5905.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4248.T is less volatile compared to 5905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4248.T.Check 5905.T's competition here