BIT Mining Limited
BIT Mining Limited (50C.MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (50C.MU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50C.MU | €0.18 | -90.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSF.DE | €459.50 | -0.44% | 3.4T | 37.73 | €12.18 | +0.66% |
| MSF.F | €457.10 | -1.06% | 3.4T | 37.62 | €12.15 | +0.66% |
| ORC.DE | €217.35 | +1.02% | 610.5B | 57.05 | €3.81 | +0.74% |
| PTX.F | €149.78 | +7.83% | 336.8B | 783.26 | €0.19 | N/A |
| ADB.DE | €293.90 | -1.36% | 124.7B | 21.50 | €13.67 | N/A |
| BZF1.DE | €139.80 | -1.55% | 60.4B | 45.99 | €3.04 | N/A |
| SQ3.F | €65.03 | -1.13% | 40B | 18.23 | €3.56 | N/A |
| VRS.DE | €220.40 | +0.82% | 20.6B | 36.31 | €6.07 | +0.30% |
| KKS.F | €76.60 | +2.96% | 14.4B | 8.10 | €9.38 | +4.64% |
Stock Comparison
50C.MU vs MSF.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, MSF.DE has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while MSF.DE trades at €459.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSF.DE's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to MSF.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to MSF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check MSF.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs MSF.F Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, MSF.F has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while MSF.F trades at €457.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSF.F's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to MSF.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to MSF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check MSF.F's competition here
50C.MU vs ORC.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, ORC.DE has a market cap of 610.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while ORC.DE trades at €217.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORC.DE's P/E ratio is 57.05. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to ORC.DE's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to ORC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check ORC.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs PTX.F Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, PTX.F has a market cap of 336.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while PTX.F trades at €149.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTX.F's P/E ratio is 783.26. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to PTX.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to PTX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check PTX.F's competition here
50C.MU vs ADB.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, ADB.DE has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while ADB.DE trades at €293.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADB.DE's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to ADB.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to ADB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check ADB.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs BZF1.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, BZF1.DE has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while BZF1.DE trades at €139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZF1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to BZF1.DE's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to BZF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check BZF1.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs SQ3.F Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SQ3.F has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while SQ3.F trades at €65.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ3.F's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to SQ3.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to SQ3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check SQ3.F's competition here
50C.MU vs VRS.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, VRS.DE has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while VRS.DE trades at €220.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRS.DE's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to VRS.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to VRS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check VRS.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs KKS.F Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, KKS.F has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while KKS.F trades at €76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKS.F's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to KKS.F's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to KKS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check KKS.F's competition here
50C.MU vs AK3.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, AK3.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while AK3.DE trades at €95.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AK3.DE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to AK3.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to AK3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check AK3.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs PMTA.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, PMTA.DE has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while PMTA.DE trades at €119.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTA.DE's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to PMTA.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to PMTA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check PMTA.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs IOS.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, IOS.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while IOS.DE trades at €40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOS.DE's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to IOS.DE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to IOS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check IOS.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs 3L7A.F Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, 3L7A.F has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while 3L7A.F trades at €121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3L7A.F's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to 3L7A.F's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to 3L7A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check 3L7A.F's competition here
50C.MU vs SOW.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SOW.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while SOW.DE trades at €37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOW.DE's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to SOW.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to SOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check SOW.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs SUSE.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SUSE.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while SUSE.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUSE.DE's P/E ratio is -57.32. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to SUSE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to SUSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check SUSE.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs YSN.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, YSN.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while YSN.DE trades at €227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSN.DE's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to YSN.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to YSN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check YSN.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs NFN.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, NFN.DE has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while NFN.DE trades at €6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFN.DE's P/E ratio is 320.00. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to NFN.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to NFN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check NFN.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs EXL.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, EXL.DE has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while EXL.DE trades at €2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXL.DE's P/E ratio is 292.00. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to EXL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to EXL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check EXL.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs CYR.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, CYR.DE has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while CYR.DE trades at €2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYR.DE's P/E ratio is -13.76. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to CYR.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to CYR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check CYR.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs R1B.F Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, R1B.F has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while R1B.F trades at €7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas R1B.F's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to R1B.F's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to R1B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check R1B.F's competition here
50C.MU vs ABT.DU Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, ABT.DU has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while ABT.DU trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABT.DU's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to ABT.DU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to ABT.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check ABT.DU's competition here
50C.MU vs UMDK.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, UMDK.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while UMDK.DE trades at €0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMDK.DE's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to UMDK.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to UMDK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check UMDK.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs O5H.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, O5H.DE has a market cap of 400.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while O5H.DE trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O5H.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to O5H.DE's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to O5H.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check O5H.DE's competition here
50C.MU vs INW1.DE Comparison August 2025
50C.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, INW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18, while INW1.DE trades at €2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INW1.DE's P/E ratio is -61.94. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to INW1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to INW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check INW1.DE's competition here