CiDi Inc. (3881.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3881.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3881.HK | HK$20.52 | +0.88% | 8.7B | -30.18 | -HK$0.68 | N/A |
| 3606.HK | HK$51.75 | +1.07% | 130.9B | 10.81 | HK$4.64 | +4.55% |
| 0425.HK | HK$28.66 | +4.67% | 33.2B | 11.07 | HK$2.59 | +5.33% |
| 0666.HK | HK$13.57 | +3.59% | 31B | -36.09 | -HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 0179.HK | HK$23.68 | +14.84% | 21.9B | 14.25 | HK$1.66 | +2.58% |
| 2525.HK | HK$139.10 | +7.33% | 21.4B | 42.00 | HK$3.27 | N/A |
| 2025.HK | HK$12.99 | -0.84% | 10.4B | 502.13 | HK$0.03 | +0.23% |
| 1316.HK | HK$4.13 | +6.17% | 10.4B | 13.00 | HK$0.32 | +3.46% |
| 9690.HK | HK$13.08 | +2.03% | 9.9B | 14.31 | HK$0.91 | N/A |
| 1057.HK | HK$3.87 | +5.74% | 8.8B | 19.33 | HK$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
3881.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 3606.HK trades at HK$51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 3606.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0425.HK trades at HK$28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0425.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0666.HK trades at HK$13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is -36.09. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0666.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0179.HK trades at HK$23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0179.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 2525.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 2525.HK has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 2525.HK trades at HK$139.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 2525.HK's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2525.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 2525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 2525.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 2025.HK trades at HK$12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 502.13. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 2025.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1316.HK trades at HK$4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1316.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 9690.HK trades at HK$13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 9690.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1057.HK trades at HK$3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1057.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 2339.HK trades at HK$5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 2339.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1809.HK trades at HK$7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1809.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1571.HK trades at HK$3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1571.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 2488.HK trades at HK$7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 2488.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1899.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1760.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0951.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0305.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 2531.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 2531.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 2531.HK trades at HK$3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 2531.HK's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2531.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 2531.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 2531.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 930.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1274.HK trades at HK$3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1274.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -76.56. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 8418.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 654.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -9.05. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0360.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 559.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 271.84. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 6162.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 6830.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0096.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 2457.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 2457.HK has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 2457.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 2457.HK's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2457.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 2457.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 2457.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1148.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1930.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1188.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 8135.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -54.16. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 6163.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +10.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0872.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 6928.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 1269.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 0479.HK's competition here
3881.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison July 2026
3881.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3881.HK stands at 8.7B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3881.HK is priced at HK$20.52, while 8283.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3881.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.18, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, 3881.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3881.HK is less volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3881.HK.Check 8283.HK's competition here