China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 0048.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 0048.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0048.HK | HK$0.37 | +2.78% | 162M | 3.75 | HK$0.10 | N/A |
| 2338.HK | HK$31.06 | -3.24% | 288.8B | 23.00 | HK$1.45 | +2.46% |
| 3606.HK | HK$55.60 | -3.56% | 149.8B | 12.37 | HK$4.64 | +4.10% |
| 0425.HK | HK$27.54 | -1.50% | 34B | 11.20 | HK$2.59 | +5.27% |
| 0666.HK | HK$10.39 | +1.86% | 24.3B | 35.26 | HK$0.30 | N/A |
| 2525.HK | HK$17.98 | -1.15% | 23.4B | 6.15 | HK$3.04 | N/A |
| 0179.HK | HK$19.71 | -1.84% | 18.8B | 12.20 | HK$1.66 | +3.01% |
| 1316.HK | HK$5.11 | -1.45% | 13.2B | 13.66 | HK$0.39 | +2.71% |
| 2025.HK | HK$12.16 | +4.02% | 9.6B | 463.47 | HK$0.03 | +0.25% |
| 9690.HK | HK$11.35 | -5.26% | 9.1B | 9.88 | HK$1.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Weichai Power Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2338.HK)
0048.HK vs 2338.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2338.HK has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2338.HK trades at HK$31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2338.HK's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2338.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 2338.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2338.HK's competition here
Fuyao Glass Industry Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3606.HK)
0048.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 3606.HK trades at HK$55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 3606.HK's competition here
Minth Group Limited (HKSE: 0425.HK)
0048.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0425.HK trades at HK$27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0425.HK's competition here
REPT BATTERO Energy Co Ltd (HKSE: 0666.HK)
0048.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0666.HK trades at HK$10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0666.HK's competition here
Hesai Group (HKSE: 2525.HK)
0048.HK vs 2525.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2525.HK has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2525.HK trades at HK$17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2525.HK's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2525.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 2525.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2525.HK's competition here
Johnson Electric Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0179.HK)
0048.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0179.HK trades at HK$19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0179.HK's competition here
Nexteer Automotive Group Limited (HKSE: 1316.HK)
0048.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1316.HK trades at HK$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1316.HK's competition here
Ruifeng Power Group Company Limited (HKSE: 2025.HK)
0048.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2025.HK trades at HK$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 463.47. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2025.HK's competition here
TUHU Car Inc (HKSE: 9690.HK)
0048.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 9690.HK trades at HK$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 9690.HK's competition here
Zhejiang Shibao Company Limited (HKSE: 1057.HK)
0048.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1057.HK trades at HK$3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1057.HK's competition here
Prinx Chengshan Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1809.HK)
0048.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1809.HK trades at HK$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1809.HK's competition here
Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1571.HK)
0048.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1571.HK trades at HK$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1571.HK's competition here
BeijingWest Industries International Limited (HKSE: 2339.HK)
0048.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2339.HK trades at HK$4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2339.HK's competition here
Launch Tech Company Limited (HKSE: 2488.HK)
0048.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2488.HK trades at HK$7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2488.HK's competition here
Xingda International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1899.HK)
0048.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1899.HK's competition here
Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp. (HKSE: 0699.HK)
0048.HK vs 0699.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0699.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0699.HK trades at HK$12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0699.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0699.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 0699.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0699.HK's competition here
GL-Carlink Technology Holding Limited (HKSE: 2531.HK)
0048.HK vs 2531.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2531.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2531.HK trades at HK$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2531.HK's P/E ratio is 70.71. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2531.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 2531.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2531.HK's competition here
Chaowei Power Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0951.HK)
0048.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0951.HK's competition here
Intron Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1760.HK)
0048.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1760.HK's competition here
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0305.HK)
0048.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0305.HK's competition here
iMotion Automotive Tech (HKSE: 1274.HK)
0048.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 707.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1274.HK trades at HK$2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1274.HK's competition here
Beijing SinoHytec Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2402.HK)
0048.HK vs 2402.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2402.HK has a market cap of 570.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2402.HK trades at HK$11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2402.HK's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2402.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 2402.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2402.HK's competition here
NASN Intelligent Tech (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2261.HK)
0048.HK vs 2261.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2261.HK has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2261.HK trades at HK$14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2261.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2261.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 2261.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2261.HK's competition here
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0360.HK)
0048.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 447.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0360.HK's competition here
Optima Automobile Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8418.HK)
0048.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -43.27. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 8418.HK's competition here
Buyang International Holding Inc. (HKSE: 2457.HK)
0048.HK vs 2457.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 2457.HK has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 2457.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 2457.HK's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2457.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 2457.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 2457.HK's competition here
Huazhong In-Vehicle Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 6830.HK)
0048.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 362.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 6830.HK's competition here
Yusei Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0096.HK)
0048.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0096.HK's competition here
Xinchen China Power Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1148.HK)
0048.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 294.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1148.HK's competition here
Hybrid Kinetic Group Limited (HKSE: 1188.HK)
0048.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1188.HK's competition here
Shinelong Automotive Lightweight Application Limited (HKSE: 1930.HK)
0048.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1930.HK's competition here
ZMFY Automobile Glass Services Limited (HKSE: 8135.HK)
0048.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 8135.HK's competition here
China Tianrui Automotive Interiors Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6162.HK)
0048.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 78.64. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 6162.HK's competition here
TOMO Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6928.HK)
0048.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 6928.HK's competition here
Titan Invo Technology Limited (HKSE: 0872.HK)
0048.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +10.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is less volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0872.HK's competition here
China First Capital Group Limited (HKSE: 1269.HK)
0048.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 1269.HK's competition here
CIL Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0479.HK)
0048.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison August 2026
China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0048.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0048.HK stands at 162M. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0048.HK is priced at HK$0.37 on the HKSE, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0048.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.75, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 0048.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0048.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0048.HK.Check 0479.HK's competition here