BeijingWest Industries International Limited
BeijingWest Industries International Limited (2339.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2339.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2339.HK | HK$7.20 | -6.01% | 6.4B | -149.20 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 3606.HK | HK$57.55 | +1.59% | 148.5B | 14.55 | HK$3.91 | +4.14% |
| 0425.HK | HK$38.38 | +4.52% | 43.4B | 14.06 | HK$2.67 | +1.16% |
| 0666.HK | HK$15.53 | -1.08% | 35B | 49.42 | HK$0.31 | N/A |
| 0179.HK | HK$29.72 | +16.00% | 25.2B | 12.21 | HK$2.23 | +2.24% |
| 2525.HK | HK$168.30 | +6.18% | 24.9B | 42.94 | HK$3.71 | N/A |
| 1316.HK | HK$5.16 | +8.63% | 12.9B | 16.09 | HK$0.32 | +1.32% |
| 1057.HK | HK$5.18 | +10.92% | 11.8B | 21.50 | HK$0.24 | +1.77% |
| 9690.HK | HK$13.29 | -2.06% | 10.2B | 23.14 | HK$0.58 | N/A |
| 2025.HK | HK$8.64 | +0.35% | 7B | 292.00 | HK$0.03 | +0.23% |
Stock Comparison
2339.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 148.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 3606.HK trades at HK$57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 3606.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0425.HK trades at HK$38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0425.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0666.HK trades at HK$15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is 49.42. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0666.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0179.HK trades at HK$29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is less volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0179.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 2525.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 2525.HK has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 2525.HK trades at HK$168.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 2525.HK's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2525.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 2525.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 2525.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1316.HK trades at HK$5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1316.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1057.HK trades at HK$5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1057.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 9690.HK trades at HK$13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 9690.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 2025.HK trades at HK$8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 292.00. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 2025.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0819.HK trades at HK$6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0819.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1809.HK trades at HK$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1809.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1571.HK trades at HK$4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1571.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 2488.HK trades at HK$8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 2488.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1899.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1760.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0951.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0305.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 2531.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 2531.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 2531.HK trades at HK$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 2531.HK's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2531.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is less volatile compared to 2531.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 2531.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 999.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1274.HK trades at HK$4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is less volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1274.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 843.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0360.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 561M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 8418.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 132.02. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 6162.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 6830.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0096.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 296.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1148.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1930.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1188.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is less volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 8135.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +10.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0872.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 6928.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -39.50. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 6163.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1991.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1991.HK has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1991.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1991.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1991.HK's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is less volatile compared to 1991.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1991.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1241.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1241.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 1269.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 0479.HK's competition here
2339.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison May 2026
2339.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2339.HK stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, 2339.HK is priced at HK$7.20, while 8283.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2339.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -149.20, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 2339.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 2339.HK is more volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2339.HK.Check 8283.HK's competition here