China Zheshang Bank Co., Ltd
China Zheshang Bank Co., Ltd 2016.HK Peers
See (2016.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016.HK | HK$3.10 | +1.31% | 98.1B | 5.34 | HK$0.58 | +6.36% |
| 3968.HK | HK$51.85 | -0.48% | 1.3T | 8.43 | HK$6.15 | +4.56% |
| 1658.HK | HK$5.26 | +0.19% | 498.4B | 6.05 | HK$0.87 | +9.91% |
| 0998.HK | HK$7.49 | +1.49% | 485.6B | 5.81 | HK$1.29 | +8.14% |
| 2388.HK | HK$34.75 | +0.43% | 367.4B | 9.60 | HK$3.62 | +5.77% |
| 6818.HK | HK$3.93 | +1.29% | 256.6B | 5.70 | HK$0.69 | +8.41% |
| 1988.HK | HK$4.69 | +1.30% | 226.9B | 6.90 | HK$0.68 | +8.83% |
| 0011.HK | HK$114.80 | +0.53% | 216.1B | 12.32 | HK$9.32 | +6.01% |
| 3618.HK | HK$6.73 | +0.45% | 88.9B | 6.23 | HK$1.08 | +4.48% |
| 3698.HK | HK$3.54 | -1.12% | 48.3B | 3.03 | HK$1.17 | +4.94% |
Stock Comparison
2016.HK vs 3968.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3968.HK has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 3968.HK trades at HK$51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 3968.HK's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3968.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 3968.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1658.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1658.HK has a market cap of 498.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1658.HK trades at HK$5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1658.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1658.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 0998.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 0998.HK has a market cap of 485.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 0998.HK trades at HK$7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 0998.HK's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0998.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0998.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 2388.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 2388.HK has a market cap of 367.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 2388.HK trades at HK$34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 2388.HK's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2388.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 2388.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 6818.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6818.HK has a market cap of 256.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 6818.HK trades at HK$3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 6818.HK's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6818.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6818.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1988.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1988.HK has a market cap of 226.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1988.HK trades at HK$4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1988.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1988.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1988.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 0011.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 0011.HK has a market cap of 216.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 0011.HK trades at HK$114.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 0011.HK's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0011.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 3618.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3618.HK has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 3618.HK trades at HK$6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 3618.HK's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 3618.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 3698.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3698.HK has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 3698.HK trades at HK$3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 3698.HK's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3698.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 3698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1963.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1963.HK has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1963.HK trades at HK$8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1963.HK's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1963.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1963.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 0023.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 0023.HK has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 0023.HK trades at HK$11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 0023.HK's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0023.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 3866.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3866.HK has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 3866.HK trades at HK$4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 3866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3866.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 3866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 9889.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 9889.HK has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 9889.HK trades at HK$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 9889.HK's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9889.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 9889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1551.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1551.HK has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1551.HK trades at HK$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1551.HK's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1551.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 1551.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 0416.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 0416.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 0416.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 0416.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0416.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0416.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 9677.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 9677.HK has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 9677.HK trades at HK$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 9677.HK's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9677.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 9677.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 6196.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6196.HK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 6196.HK trades at HK$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 6196.HK's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6196.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 6196.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 6199.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6199.HK has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 6199.HK trades at HK$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 6199.HK's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6199.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 6199.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 9668.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 9668.HK has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 9668.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 9668.HK's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9668.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 9668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1216.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1216.HK has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1216.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1216.HK's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1216.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1216.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 6190.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6190.HK has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 6190.HK trades at HK$5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 6190.HK's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6190.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6190.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1578.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1578.HK has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1578.HK trades at HK$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1578.HK's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1578.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1578.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 2356.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 2356.HK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 2356.HK trades at HK$8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 2356.HK's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2356.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 2356.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 2066.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 2066.HK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 2066.HK trades at HK$1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 2066.HK's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2066.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 2066.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 0440.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 0440.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 0440.HK trades at HK$29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 0440.HK's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0440.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0440.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 2558.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 2558.HK has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 2558.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 2558.HK's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2558.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 2558.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1916.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1916.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1916.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1916.HK's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1916.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1916.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1983.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1983.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1983.HK trades at HK$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1983.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1983.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1983.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 6138.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6138.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 6138.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 6138.HK's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6138.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6138.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 2139.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 2139.HK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 2139.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 2139.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2139.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 2139.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 6122.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6122.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 6122.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 6122.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6122.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 6122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 0626.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 0626.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 0626.HK trades at HK$1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 0626.HK's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0626.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is more volatile compared to 0626.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.
2016.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison
2016.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2016.HK stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2016.HK is priced at HK$3.10, while 1111.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2016.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.34, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, 2016.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2016.HK is less volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2016.HK.