BBMG Corporation (2009.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2009.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009.HK | HK$0.69 | +0.00% | 14.2B | -3.18 | -HK$0.22 | +7.77% |
| 0914.HK | HK$17.86 | -2.19% | 96.2B | 10.61 | HK$1.71 | +5.30% |
| 0868.HK | HK$9.22 | -1.28% | 41.6B | 13.06 | HK$0.72 | +3.62% |
| 6655.HK | HK$13.08 | -3.04% | 37.7B | 7.80 | HK$1.74 | +4.52% |
| 3323.HK | HK$4.66 | -9.16% | 36.7B | -8.62 | -HK$0.56 | +3.54% |
| 2233.HK | HK$1.68 | -11.11% | 8.9B | 8.58 | HK$0.19 | +3.37% |
| 1313.HK | HK$1.20 | +0.84% | 8.6B | 15.38 | HK$0.08 | +3.09% |
| 0695.HK | HK$7.35 | -0.14% | 4B | -91.12 | -HK$0.08 | N/A |
| 0743.HK | HK$1.92 | +0.00% | 3B | -5.97 | -HK$0.32 | +1.78% |
| 0691.HK | HK$0.35 | -4.17% | 1.5B | -1.23 | -HK$0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2009.HK vs 0914.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0914.HK has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0914.HK trades at HK$17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0914.HK's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0914.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0914.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0914.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0868.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0868.HK has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0868.HK trades at HK$9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0868.HK's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0868.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0868.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0868.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 6655.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 6655.HK has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 6655.HK trades at HK$13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 6655.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6655.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 6655.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 6655.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 3323.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 3323.HK has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 3323.HK trades at HK$4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 3323.HK's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3323.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 3323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 3323.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2233.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2233.HK has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 2233.HK trades at HK$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 2233.HK's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2233.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 2233.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2233.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1313.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1313.HK has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 1313.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 1313.HK's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1313.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1313.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0695.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0695.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0695.HK trades at HK$7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0695.HK's P/E ratio is -91.12. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0695.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0695.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0743.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0743.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0743.HK trades at HK$1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0743.HK's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0743.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0743.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0743.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0691.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0691.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0691.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0691.HK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0691.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0691.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0691.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1252.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1252.HK has a market cap of 740M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 1252.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 1252.HK's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1252.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1252.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1252.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1943.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1943.HK has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 1943.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 1943.HK's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1943.HK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1943.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1943.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 3300.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 3300.HK has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 3300.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 3300.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3300.HK's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 3300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 3300.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2187.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2187.HK has a market cap of 478.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 2187.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 2187.HK's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2187.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2187.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0366.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0366.HK has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0366.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0366.HK's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0366.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0366.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0366.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2450.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2450.HK has a market cap of 325.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 2450.HK trades at HK$4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 2450.HK's P/E ratio is -37.92. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2450.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2450.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2450.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2212.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2212.HK has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 2212.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 2212.HK's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2212.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2212.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2212.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 6193.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 6193.HK has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 6193.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 6193.HK's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6193.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 6193.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 6193.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1312.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1312.HK has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 1312.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 1312.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1312.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1312.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1312.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1102.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1102.HK has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 1102.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 1102.HK's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1102.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 1102.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1102.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1847.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1847.HK has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 1847.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 1847.HK's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1847.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1847.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1847.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0058.HK Comparison June 2026
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0058.HK has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.69, while 0058.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.18, whereas 0058.HK's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0058.HK's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0058.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0058.HK's competition here