BBMG Corporation
BBMG Corporation 2009.HK Peers
See (2009.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009.HK | HK$0.68 | -1.45% | 14.7B | -4.25 | -HK$0.16 | +8.65% |
| 0914.HK | HK$18.86 | -2.38% | 118.2B | 11.36 | HK$1.66 | +4.39% |
| 0868.HK | HK$7.06 | -3.81% | 30.8B | 8.94 | HK$0.79 | +5.59% |
| 3323.HK | HK$3.56 | +2.30% | 27.4B | 11.48 | HK$0.31 | +5.42% |
| 6655.HK | HK$8.56 | +1.90% | 23.2B | 6.74 | HK$1.27 | +6.52% |
| 1313.HK | HK$1.60 | -0.63% | 11.2B | 53.33 | HK$0.03 | +1.88% |
| 2233.HK | HK$1.29 | N/A | 7B | 9.92 | HK$0.13 | +20.69% |
| 0743.HK | HK$2.25 | -1.32% | 3.5B | -7.03 | -HK$0.32 | N/A |
| 0691.HK | HK$0.47 | -1.05% | 2B | -15.67 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0695.HK | HK$2.76 | N/A | 1.5B | -34.50 | -HK$0.08 | +4.93% |
Stock Comparison
2009.HK vs 0914.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0914.HK has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0914.HK trades at HK$18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0914.HK's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0914.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0914.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 0868.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0868.HK has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0868.HK trades at HK$7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0868.HK's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0868.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0868.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 3323.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 3323.HK has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 3323.HK trades at HK$3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 3323.HK's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3323.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 3323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 6655.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 6655.HK has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 6655.HK trades at HK$8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 6655.HK's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6655.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 6655.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 1313.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 1313.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 1313.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 1313.HK's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1313.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 2233.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 2233.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 2233.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 2233.HK's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2233.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 2233.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 0743.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0743.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0743.HK trades at HK$2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0743.HK's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0743.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0743.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 0691.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0691.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0691.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0691.HK's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0691.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0691.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 0695.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0695.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0695.HK trades at HK$2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0695.HK's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0695.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 1252.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 1252.HK has a market cap of 832.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 1252.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 1252.HK's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1252.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1252.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 3300.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 3300.HK has a market cap of 488.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 3300.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 3300.HK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3300.HK's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 3300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 1943.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 1943.HK has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 1943.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 1943.HK's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1943.HK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1943.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 2187.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 2187.HK has a market cap of 374M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 2187.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 2187.HK's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2187.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 0366.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0366.HK has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0366.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0366.HK's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0366.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0366.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 2450.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 2450.HK has a market cap of 175.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 2450.HK trades at HK$2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 2450.HK's P/E ratio is -29.56. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2450.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2450.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 2212.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 2212.HK has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 2212.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 2212.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2212.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2212.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 6193.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 6193.HK has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 6193.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 6193.HK's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6193.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 6193.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 1102.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 1102.HK has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 1102.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 1102.HK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1102.HK's ROE of +4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1102.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 1847.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 1847.HK has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 1847.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 1847.HK's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1847.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 1847.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.
2009.HK vs 0058.HK Comparison
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 14.7B. In comparison, 0058.HK has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.68, while 0058.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.25, whereas 0058.HK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0058.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0058.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.