BBMG Corporation
BBMG Corporation (2009.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2009.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009.HK | HK$0.82 | +1.23% | 16.6B | -5.12 | -HK$0.16 | +6.72% |
| 0914.HK | HK$22.58 | -0.31% | 131.1B | 13.63 | HK$1.66 | +3.42% |
| 3323.HK | HK$4.69 | +1.74% | 36B | 15.13 | HK$0.31 | +3.74% |
| 0868.HK | HK$7.93 | -2.46% | 34.4B | 9.31 | HK$0.84 | +5.24% |
| 6655.HK | HK$13.33 | +2.78% | 32.4B | 10.50 | HK$1.27 | +3.87% |
| 1313.HK | HK$1.90 | +1.06% | 13.3B | 63.33 | HK$0.03 | +1.60% |
| 2233.HK | HK$2.12 | +1.44% | 11.6B | 16.31 | HK$0.13 | +1.77% |
| 0743.HK | HK$2.83 | +7.20% | 4.3B | -8.59 | -HK$0.32 | N/A |
| 0691.HK | HK$0.71 | +1.43% | 3B | -23.00 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0695.HK | HK$2.97 | +19.28% | 1.5B | -33.87 | -HK$0.08 | +5.02% |
Stock Comparison
2009.HK vs 0914.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0914.HK has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0914.HK trades at HK$22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0914.HK's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0914.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0914.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0914.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 3323.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 3323.HK has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 3323.HK trades at HK$4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 3323.HK's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3323.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 3323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 3323.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0868.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0868.HK has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0868.HK trades at HK$7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0868.HK's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0868.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0868.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0868.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 6655.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 6655.HK has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 6655.HK trades at HK$13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 6655.HK's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6655.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 6655.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 6655.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1313.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 1313.HK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1313.HK trades at HK$1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 1313.HK's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1313.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1313.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2233.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 2233.HK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2233.HK trades at HK$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 2233.HK's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2233.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 2233.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2233.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0743.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0743.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0743.HK trades at HK$2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0743.HK's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0743.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0743.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0743.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0691.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0691.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0691.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0691.HK's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0691.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0691.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0691.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0695.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0695.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0695.HK trades at HK$2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0695.HK's P/E ratio is -33.87. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0695.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0695.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1252.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 1252.HK has a market cap of 832.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1252.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 1252.HK's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1252.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1252.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1252.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 3300.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 3300.HK has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 3300.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 3300.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3300.HK's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 3300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 3300.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0366.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0366.HK has a market cap of 462.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0366.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0366.HK's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0366.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 0366.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0366.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1943.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 1943.HK has a market cap of 390M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1943.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 1943.HK's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1943.HK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1943.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1943.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2187.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 2187.HK has a market cap of 344.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2187.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 2187.HK's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2187.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is more volatile compared to 2187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2187.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2450.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 2450.HK has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2450.HK trades at HK$2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 2450.HK's P/E ratio is -29.78. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2450.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 2450.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2450.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1847.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 1847.HK has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1847.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 1847.HK's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1847.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1847.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1847.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 2212.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 2212.HK has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2212.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 2212.HK's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2212.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 2212.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 2212.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 6193.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 6193.HK has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 6193.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 6193.HK's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6193.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 6193.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 6193.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 1102.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 1102.HK has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1102.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 1102.HK's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1102.HK's ROE of +4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 1102.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 1102.HK's competition here
2009.HK vs 0058.HK Comparison August 2025
2009.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2009.HK stands at 16.6B. In comparison, 0058.HK has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, 2009.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0058.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2009.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.12, whereas 0058.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 2009.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0058.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 2009.HK is less volatile compared to 0058.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2009.HK.Check 0058.HK's competition here