Hingtex Holdings Limited
Hingtex Holdings Limited (1968.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1968.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1968.HK | HK$0.11 | +0.95% | 67.8M | -2.12 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 2313.HK | HK$56.10 | -1.32% | 84.3B | 12.36 | HK$4.54 | +4.51% |
| 3998.HK | HK$4.37 | -2.46% | 50.3B | 12.85 | HK$0.34 | +6.05% |
| 2232.HK | HK$5.66 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 10.29 | HK$0.55 | +5.80% |
| 2299.HK | HK$4.45 | +0.00% | 9.4B | 11.71 | HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 3306.HK | HK$18.16 | -2.37% | 9.4B | 9.82 | HK$1.85 | +7.21% |
| 1709.HK | HK$3.41 | -1.16% | 5.1B | 37.89 | HK$0.09 | +0.58% |
| 1234.HK | HK$3.68 | -0.81% | 4.4B | 8.76 | HK$0.42 | +8.15% |
| 2678.HK | HK$4.75 | -0.42% | 4.4B | 7.20 | HK$0.66 | +4.21% |
| 2698.HK | HK$3.49 | +0.29% | 4.2B | -2.68 | -HK$1.30 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1968.HK vs 2313.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2313.HK has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2313.HK trades at HK$56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2313.HK's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2313.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2313.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3998.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3998.HK has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3998.HK trades at HK$4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3998.HK's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3998.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 3998.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 3998.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2232.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2232.HK has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2232.HK trades at HK$5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2232.HK's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2232.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2232.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2232.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2299.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2299.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2299.HK trades at HK$4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2299.HK's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2299.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2299.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2299.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3306.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3306.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3306.HK trades at HK$18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3306.HK's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3306.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 3306.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 3306.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1709.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1709.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1709.HK trades at HK$3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1709.HK's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1709.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1709.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1709.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1234.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1234.HK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1234.HK trades at HK$3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1234.HK's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1234.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1234.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1234.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2678.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2678.HK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2678.HK trades at HK$4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2678.HK's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2678.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2678.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2698.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2698.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2698.HK trades at HK$3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2698.HK's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2698.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2698.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2111.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2111.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2111.HK trades at HK$2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2111.HK's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2111.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2111.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2111.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3818.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3818.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3818.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3818.HK's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3818.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 3818.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 3818.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2199.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2199.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2199.HK trades at HK$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2199.HK's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2199.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2199.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2199.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2368.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2368.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2368.HK trades at HK$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2368.HK's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2368.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2368.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2368.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1382.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1382.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1382.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1382.HK's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1382.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1382.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1382.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1982.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1982.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1982.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1982.HK's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1982.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1982.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1982.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1520.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1520.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1520.HK trades at HK$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1520.HK's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1520.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1520.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1520.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0321.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0321.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0321.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0321.HK's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0321.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0321.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0321.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2399.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2399.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2399.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2399.HK's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2399.HK's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2399.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2399.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2030.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2030.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2030.HK trades at HK$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2030.HK's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2030.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2030.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2030.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2668.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2668.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2668.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2668.HK's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2668.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2668.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0533.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0533.HK has a market cap of 983.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0533.HK trades at HK$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0533.HK's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0533.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0533.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0533.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1346.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1346.HK has a market cap of 945.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1346.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1346.HK's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1346.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1346.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1346.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1425.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1425.HK has a market cap of 850M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1425.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1425.HK's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1425.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1425.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1425.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2011.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2011.HK has a market cap of 821.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2011.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2011.HK's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2011.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 2011.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2011.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2298.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2298.HK has a market cap of 784.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2298.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2298.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2298.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2298.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2298.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0528.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0528.HK has a market cap of 733.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0528.HK trades at HK$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0528.HK's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0528.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0528.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0528.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0420.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0420.HK has a market cap of 722.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0420.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0420.HK's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0420.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0420.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0420.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3608.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3608.HK has a market cap of 700.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3608.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3608.HK's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3608.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 3608.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3608.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8041.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8041.HK has a market cap of 696.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8041.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8041.HK's P/E ratio is -447.37. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8041.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8041.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8041.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8195.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8195.HK has a market cap of 669.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8195.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8195.HK's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8195.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8195.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8195.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0458.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0458.HK has a market cap of 656.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0458.HK trades at HK$2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0458.HK's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0458.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0458.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0458.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8521.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8521.HK has a market cap of 650.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8521.HK trades at HK$1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8521.HK's P/E ratio is -37.67. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8521.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8521.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8521.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0918.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0918.HK has a market cap of 646.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0918.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0918.HK's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0918.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0918.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0918.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1795.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1795.HK has a market cap of 486M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1795.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1795.HK's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1795.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1795.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1795.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1906.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1906.HK has a market cap of 478.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1906.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1906.HK's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1906.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1906.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1906.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3778.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3778.HK has a market cap of 457.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3778.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3778.HK's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3778.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 3778.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3778.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0643.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0643.HK has a market cap of 431.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0643.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0643.HK's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0643.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0643.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0643.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0608.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0608.HK has a market cap of 427.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0608.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0608.HK's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0608.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0608.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0608.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1247.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1247.HK has a market cap of 426.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1247.HK trades at HK$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1247.HK's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1247.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1247.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1247.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8107.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8107.HK has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8107.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8107.HK's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8107.HK's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8107.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8107.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0146.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0146.HK has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0146.HK trades at HK$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0146.HK's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0146.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0146.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0146.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3322.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3322.HK has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3322.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3322.HK's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3322.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 3322.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 3322.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1146.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1146.HK has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1146.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1146.HK's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1146.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1146.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1146.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1433.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1433.HK has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1433.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1433.HK's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1433.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1433.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1433.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 3398.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 3398.HK has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3398.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 3398.HK's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 3398.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 3398.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 3398.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0294.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0294.HK has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0294.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0294.HK's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0294.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 0294.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0294.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1388.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1388.HK has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1388.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1388.HK's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1388.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1388.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1388.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1532.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1532.HK has a market cap of 189.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1532.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1532.HK's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1532.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 1532.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1532.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8480.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8480.HK has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8480.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8480.HK's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8480.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8480.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8480.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0844.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0844.HK has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0844.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0844.HK's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0844.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 0844.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0844.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0311.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0311.HK has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0311.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0311.HK's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0311.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 0311.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0311.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2307.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2307.HK has a market cap of 151.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2307.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2307.HK's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2307.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 2307.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 2307.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8471.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8471.HK has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8471.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8471.HK's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8471.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8471.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8471.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0122.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0122.HK has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0122.HK trades at HK$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0122.HK's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0122.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0122.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1749.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1749.HK has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1749.HK trades at HK$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1749.HK's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1749.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 1749.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1749.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0707.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0707.HK has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0707.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0707.HK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0707.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0707.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0707.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1682.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1682.HK has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1682.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1682.HK's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1682.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1682.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1682.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0036.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0036.HK has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0036.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0036.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0036.HK's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0036.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0036.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0518.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0518.HK has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0518.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0518.HK's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0518.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 0518.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0518.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0333.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0333.HK has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0333.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0333.HK's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0333.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0333.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0333.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0540.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0540.HK has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0540.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0540.HK's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0540.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0540.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0540.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1400.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1400.HK has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1400.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1400.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1400.HK's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 1400.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1400.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 2223.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 2223.HK has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2223.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 2223.HK's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2223.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 2223.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2223.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1025.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1025.HK has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1025.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1025.HK's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1025.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1025.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8377.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8377.HK has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8377.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8377.HK's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8377.HK's ROE of -20.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 8377.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8377.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8297.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8297.HK has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8297.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8297.HK's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8297.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8297.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8211.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8211.HK has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8211.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8211.HK's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8211.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8211.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8211.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8507.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8507.HK has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8507.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8507.HK's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8507.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8507.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8507.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8456.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8456.HK has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8456.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8456.HK's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8456.HK's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 8456.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8456.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 1825.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 1825.HK has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1825.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 1825.HK's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1825.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 1825.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 1825.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0130.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0130.HK has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0130.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0130.HK's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0130.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK and 0130.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0130.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 8607.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 8607.HK has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8607.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 8607.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 8607.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 8607.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 8607.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0048.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0048.HK has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0048.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0048.HK's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0048.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0048.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0048.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0787.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0787.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0787.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0787.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0787.HK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0787.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0787.HK's competition here
1968.HK vs 0539.HK Comparison August 2025
1968.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1968.HK stands at 67.8M. In comparison, 0539.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1968.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0539.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1968.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas 0539.HK's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1968.HK's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 0539.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1968.HK is less volatile compared to 0539.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1968.HK.Check 0539.HK's competition here