China Ting Group Holdings Limited (3398.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3398.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3398.HK | HK$0.12 | +0.86% | 245.7M | -1.09 | -HK$0.11 | N/A |
| 2313.HK | HK$41.80 | +2.35% | 62.8B | 9.81 | HK$4.26 | +6.17% |
| 3998.HK | HK$4.49 | +1.13% | 52.2B | 8.22 | HK$0.55 | +6.30% |
| 0551.HK | HK$12.70 | -0.16% | 20.4B | 6.83 | HK$1.86 | +10.24% |
| 1910.HK | HK$13.89 | +0.51% | 18.9B | 8.94 | HK$1.55 | +5.77% |
| 1440.HK | HK$14.61 | -1.95% | 18.4B | -494.92 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 6110.HK | HK$1.89 | +2.72% | 11.7B | 8.25 | HK$0.23 | +15.37% |
| 1836.HK | HK$12.94 | +2.86% | 10.9B | 10.09 | HK$1.28 | +11.21% |
| 1361.HK | HK$4.17 | +2.21% | 9B | 5.97 | HK$0.70 | +7.60% |
| 3813.HK | HK$0.36 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 7.99 | HK$0.04 | +7.61% |
Stock Comparison
3398.HK vs 2313.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 2313.HK has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 2313.HK trades at HK$41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 2313.HK's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2313.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 2313.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 2313.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 3998.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 3998.HK has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 3998.HK trades at HK$4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 3998.HK's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 3998.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 3998.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 3998.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 0551.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 0551.HK has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 0551.HK trades at HK$12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 0551.HK's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0551.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 0551.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 0551.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1910.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1910.HK has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1910.HK trades at HK$13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1910.HK's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1910.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1910.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1910.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1440.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1440.HK has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1440.HK trades at HK$14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1440.HK's P/E ratio is -494.92. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1440.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1440.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1440.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 6110.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 6110.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 6110.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 6110.HK's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 6110.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 6110.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 6110.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1836.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1836.HK has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1836.HK trades at HK$12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1836.HK's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1836.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1361.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1361.HK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1361.HK trades at HK$4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1361.HK's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1361.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1361.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1361.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 3813.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 3813.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 3813.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 3813.HK's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 3813.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 3813.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 3813.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1657.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1657.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1657.HK trades at HK$48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1657.HK's P/E ratio is -254.26. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1657.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1657.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1028.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1028.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1028.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1028.HK's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1028.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is less volatile compared to 1028.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1028.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1121.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1121.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1121.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1121.HK's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1121.HK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1121.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1121.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 0264.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 0264.HK has a market cap of 973M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 0264.HK trades at HK$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 0264.HK's P/E ratio is -49.67. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0264.HK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 0264.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 0264.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 2399.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 2399.HK has a market cap of 951.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 2399.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 2399.HK's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2399.HK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 2399.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 2399.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1731.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1731.HK has a market cap of 873.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1731.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1731.HK's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1731.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1731.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1731.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1346.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1346.HK has a market cap of 843.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1346.HK trades at HK$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1346.HK's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1346.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1346.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1346.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1255.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1255.HK has a market cap of 779.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1255.HK trades at HK$3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1255.HK's P/E ratio is -34.07. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1255.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1255.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1255.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1425.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1425.HK has a market cap of 775M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1425.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1425.HK's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1425.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1425.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 0676.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 0676.HK has a market cap of 723.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 0676.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 0676.HK's P/E ratio is -87.92. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0676.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 0676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 0676.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 0210.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 0210.HK has a market cap of 682.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 0210.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 0210.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0210.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 0210.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 0210.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1100.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1100.HK has a market cap of 622.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1100.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1100.HK's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1100.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1100.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1100.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 0458.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 0458.HK has a market cap of 547M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 0458.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 0458.HK's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0458.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 0458.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 0458.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 2033.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 2033.HK has a market cap of 524.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 2033.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 2033.HK's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2033.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 2033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 2033.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1023.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1023.HK has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1023.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1023.HK's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1023.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1023.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1170.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1170.HK has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1170.HK trades at HK$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1170.HK's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1170.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1170.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1170.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 0738.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 0738.HK has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 0738.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 0738.HK's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0738.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is less volatile compared to 0738.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 0738.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1058.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1058.HK has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1058.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1058.HK's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1058.HK's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1058.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1058.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 8187.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 8187.HK has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 8187.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 8187.HK's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 8187.HK's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is less volatile compared to 8187.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 8187.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1063.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1063.HK has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1063.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1063.HK's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1063.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1063.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1063.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1842.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1842.HK has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1842.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1842.HK's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1842.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1842.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1842.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1386.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1386.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1386.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1386.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1386.HK's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1386.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1386.HK's competition here
3398.HK vs 1096.HK Comparison July 2026
3398.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3398.HK stands at 245.7M. In comparison, 1096.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3398.HK is priced at HK$0.12, while 1096.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3398.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas 1096.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 3398.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1096.HK's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 3398.HK is more volatile compared to 1096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3398.HK.Check 1096.HK's competition here