Yadong Group Holdings Limited
Yadong Group Holdings Limited (1795.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1795.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1795.HK | HK$0.50 | +0.00% | 300M | 7.14 | HK$0.07 | N/A |
| 2313.HK | HK$47.76 | -1.16% | 71.8B | 10.71 | HK$4.46 | +5.57% |
| 3998.HK | HK$4.32 | +1.17% | 50.2B | 12.00 | HK$0.36 | +6.55% |
| 2232.HK | HK$6.25 | -2.04% | 17.8B | 10.08 | HK$0.62 | +6.53% |
| 3306.HK | HK$21.80 | -0.73% | 11.5B | 10.38 | HK$2.10 | +6.65% |
| 2299.HK | HK$4.93 | +1.02% | 10.4B | 14.09 | HK$0.35 | N/A |
| 2678.HK | HK$7.38 | +0.14% | 6.8B | 6.47 | HK$1.14 | +2.71% |
| 0933.HK | HK$0.54 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 54.00 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 1234.HK | HK$3.82 | +1.87% | 4.6B | 7.96 | HK$0.48 | +7.33% |
| 2698.HK | HK$3.49 | +0.29% | 4.2B | -2.68 | -HK$1.30 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1795.HK vs 2313.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2313.HK has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2313.HK trades at HK$47.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2313.HK's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2313.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2313.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3998.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3998.HK has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3998.HK trades at HK$4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3998.HK's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3998.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 3998.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 3998.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2232.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2232.HK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2232.HK trades at HK$6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2232.HK's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2232.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2232.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2232.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3306.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3306.HK has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3306.HK trades at HK$21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3306.HK's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3306.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 3306.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 3306.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2299.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2299.HK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2299.HK trades at HK$4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2299.HK's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2299.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2299.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2299.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2678.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2678.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2678.HK trades at HK$7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2678.HK's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2678.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2678.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0933.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0933.HK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0933.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0933.HK's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0933.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 0933.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0933.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1234.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1234.HK has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1234.HK trades at HK$3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1234.HK's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1234.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1234.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1234.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2698.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2698.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2698.HK trades at HK$3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2698.HK's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2698.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2698.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2111.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2111.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2111.HK trades at HK$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2111.HK's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2111.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2111.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2111.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3818.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3818.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3818.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3818.HK's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3818.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 3818.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 3818.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2199.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2199.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2199.HK trades at HK$2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2199.HK's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2199.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2199.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2199.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1982.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1982.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1982.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1982.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1982.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1982.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1982.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2368.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2368.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2368.HK trades at HK$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2368.HK's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2368.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2368.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2368.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0321.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0321.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0321.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0321.HK's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0321.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0321.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0321.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1382.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1382.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1382.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1382.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1382.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1382.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1382.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2668.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2668.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2668.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2668.HK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2668.HK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2668.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1709.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1709.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1709.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1709.HK's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1709.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1709.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1709.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0533.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0533.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0533.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0533.HK's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0533.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0533.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0533.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2298.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2298.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2298.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2298.HK's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2298.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2298.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2298.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1346.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1346.HK has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1346.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1346.HK's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1346.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 1346.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1346.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0918.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0918.HK has a market cap of 891.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0918.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0918.HK's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0918.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0918.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0918.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1425.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1425.HK has a market cap of 887.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1425.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1425.HK's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1425.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1425.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1425.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0420.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0420.HK has a market cap of 882M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0420.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0420.HK's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0420.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0420.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0420.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2030.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2030.HK has a market cap of 875.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2030.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2030.HK's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2030.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2030.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2030.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1906.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1906.HK has a market cap of 823.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1906.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1906.HK's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1906.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1906.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1906.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0528.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0528.HK has a market cap of 721.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0528.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0528.HK's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0528.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0528.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0528.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2011.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2011.HK has a market cap of 706.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2011.HK trades at HK$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2011.HK's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2011.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2011.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2011.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3608.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3608.HK has a market cap of 700.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3608.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3608.HK's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3608.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 3608.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3608.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1520.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1520.HK has a market cap of 616.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1520.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1520.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1520.HK's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1520.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1520.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8041.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8041.HK has a market cap of 573.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8041.HK trades at HK$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8041.HK's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8041.HK's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8041.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8041.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8195.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8195.HK has a market cap of 573.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8195.HK trades at HK$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8195.HK's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8195.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8195.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8195.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0458.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0458.HK has a market cap of 560.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0458.HK trades at HK$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0458.HK's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0458.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 0458.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0458.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8521.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8521.HK has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8521.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8521.HK's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8521.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8521.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8521.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0608.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0608.HK has a market cap of 394.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0608.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0608.HK's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0608.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0608.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0608.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3778.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3778.HK has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3778.HK trades at HK$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3778.HK's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3778.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 3778.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3778.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1247.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1247.HK has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1247.HK trades at HK$1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1247.HK's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1247.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1247.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1247.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0146.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0146.HK has a market cap of 339.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0146.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0146.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0146.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0146.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0146.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3322.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3322.HK has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3322.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3322.HK's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3322.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 3322.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 3322.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2223.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2223.HK has a market cap of 239.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2223.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2223.HK's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2223.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2223.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2223.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0311.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0311.HK has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0311.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0311.HK's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0311.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0311.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0311.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8507.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8507.HK has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8507.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8507.HK's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8507.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8507.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8507.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0643.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0643.HK has a market cap of 220.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0643.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0643.HK's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0643.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0643.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0643.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 2307.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 2307.HK has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2307.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 2307.HK's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2307.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 2307.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 2307.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 3398.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 3398.HK has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3398.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 3398.HK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3398.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 3398.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 3398.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8107.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8107.HK has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8107.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8107.HK's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8107.HK's ROE of +8.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 8107.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8107.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0844.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0844.HK has a market cap of 190.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0844.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0844.HK's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0844.HK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0844.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0844.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1532.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1532.HK has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1532.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1532.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1532.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1532.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1532.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1146.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1146.HK has a market cap of 175.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1146.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1146.HK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1146.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1146.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1146.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0294.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0294.HK has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0294.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0294.HK's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0294.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 0294.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0294.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1433.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1433.HK has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1433.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1433.HK's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1433.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1433.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1433.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1388.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1388.HK has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1388.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1388.HK's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1388.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1388.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1388.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8480.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8480.HK has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8480.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8480.HK's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8480.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8480.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8480.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0707.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0707.HK has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0707.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0707.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0707.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0707.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0707.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1682.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1682.HK has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1682.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1682.HK's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1682.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1682.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1682.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0540.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0540.HK has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0540.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0540.HK's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0540.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0540.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0540.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1968.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1968.HK has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1968.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1968.HK's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1968.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 1968.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1968.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0122.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0122.HK has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0122.HK trades at HK$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0122.HK's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0122.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0122.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0036.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0036.HK has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0036.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0036.HK's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0036.HK's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0036.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0036.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0518.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0518.HK has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0518.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0518.HK's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0518.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0518.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0518.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1749.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1749.HK has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1749.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1749.HK's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1749.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1749.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1749.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1400.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1400.HK has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1400.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1400.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1400.HK's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1400.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1400.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0333.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0333.HK has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0333.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0333.HK's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0333.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0333.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0333.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1025.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1025.HK has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1025.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1025.HK's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1025.HK's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1025.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0048.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0048.HK has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0048.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0048.HK's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0048.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 0048.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0048.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0130.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0130.HK has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0130.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0130.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0130.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 0130.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0130.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8297.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8297.HK has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8297.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8297.HK's ROE of -13.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8297.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8297.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8211.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8211.HK has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8211.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8211.HK's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8211.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8211.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8211.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8456.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8456.HK has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8456.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8456.HK's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8456.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 8456.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8456.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8377.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8377.HK has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8377.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8377.HK's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8377.HK's ROE of +2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK and 8377.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8377.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8471.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8471.HK has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8471.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8471.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8471.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8471.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8471.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 8607.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 8607.HK has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8607.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 8607.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8607.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 8607.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 8607.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 1825.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 1825.HK has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1825.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 1825.HK's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1825.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 1825.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 1825.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0787.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0787.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0787.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0787.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0787.HK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0787.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0787.HK's competition here
1795.HK vs 0539.HK Comparison April 2026
1795.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1795.HK stands at 300M. In comparison, 0539.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1795.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0539.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1795.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas 0539.HK's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1795.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0539.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1795.HK is less volatile compared to 0539.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1795.HK.Check 0539.HK's competition here