Shandong International Trust Co., Ltd.
Shandong International Trust Co., Ltd. 1697.HK Peers
See (1697.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1697.HK | HK$0.39 | -1.27% | 1.8B | 13.00 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 82800.HK | HK$22.38 | -0.80% | 121.1B | N/A | N/A | +9.61% |
| 2799.HK | HK$1.28 | -0.78% | 103.5B | 10.67 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 2800.HK | HK$24.52 | -0.73% | 77.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.43% |
| 2823.HK | HK$14.31 | +0.21% | 50.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.95% |
| 1359.HK | HK$1.34 | -2.19% | 47.1B | 33.50 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 2828.HK | HK$88.42 | -1.25% | 43.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.54% |
| 3033.HK | HK$5.21 | -0.67% | 43.4B | 19.57 | HK$0.27 | N/A |
| 82828.HK | HK$80.94 | -0.88% | 25.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.53% |
| 82823.HK | HK$13.06 | +0.15% | 15.7B | 12.43 | HK$1.05 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
1697.HK vs 82800.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 82800.HK has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 82800.HK trades at HK$22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 82800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 82800.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 82800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2799.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2799.HK has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2799.HK trades at HK$1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2799.HK's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2799.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2800.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2800.HK has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2800.HK trades at HK$24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2800.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2823.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2823.HK has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2823.HK trades at HK$14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2823.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2823.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2823.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1359.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1359.HK has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1359.HK trades at HK$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1359.HK's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1359.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 1359.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2828.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2828.HK has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2828.HK trades at HK$88.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2828.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2828.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3033.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3033.HK has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3033.HK trades at HK$5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3033.HK's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3033.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 82828.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 82828.HK has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 82828.HK trades at HK$80.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 82828.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 82828.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 82828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 82823.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 82823.HK has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 82823.HK trades at HK$13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 82823.HK's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 82823.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 82823.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3067.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3067.HK has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3067.HK trades at HK$11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3067.HK's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3067.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3067.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83188.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83188.HK has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83188.HK trades at HK$40.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83188.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83188.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83188.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0165.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0165.HK has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0165.HK trades at HK$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0165.HK's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0165.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0165.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 82822.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 82822.HK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 82822.HK trades at HK$12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 82822.HK's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 82822.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 82822.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3040.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3040.HK has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3040.HK trades at HK$33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3040.HK's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3040.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3040.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3053.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3053.HK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3053.HK trades at HK$1,159.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3053.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3053.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3053.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7552.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7552.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7552.HK trades at HK$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7552.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7552.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7552.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2827.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2827.HK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2827.HK trades at HK$37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2827.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2827.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2827.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1051.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1051.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1051.HK trades at HK$9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1051.HK's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1051.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 1051.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3032.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3032.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3032.HK trades at HK$5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3032.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3032.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2833.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2833.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2833.HK trades at HK$20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2833.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2833.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2833.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0806.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0806.HK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0806.HK trades at HK$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0806.HK's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0806.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0806.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7500.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7500.HK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7500.HK trades at HK$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7500.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7500.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7500.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3088.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3088.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3088.HK trades at HK$6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3088.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3088.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3088.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83010.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83010.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83010.HK trades at HK$57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83010.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83010.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83010.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2801.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2801.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2801.HK trades at HK$24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2801.HK's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2801.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2801.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0133.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0133.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0133.HK trades at HK$14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0133.HK's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0133.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0133.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0245.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0245.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0245.HK trades at HK$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0245.HK's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0245.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0245.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3081.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3081.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3081.HK trades at HK$78.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3081.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3081.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3081.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3115.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3115.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3115.HK trades at HK$88.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3115.HK's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3115.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3115.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2836.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2836.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2836.HK trades at HK$42.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2836.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2836.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7568.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7568.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7568.HK trades at HK$4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7568.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7568.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7568.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0905.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0905.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0905.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0905.HK's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0905.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0905.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2845.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2845.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2845.HK trades at HK$85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2845.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2845.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2845.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1140.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1140.HK has a market cap of 957.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1140.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1140.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1140.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 1140.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 9096.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9096.HK has a market cap of 923.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 9096.HK trades at HK$118.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 9096.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 9096.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 9096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3167.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3167.HK has a market cap of 776.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3167.HK trades at HK$62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3167.HK's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3167.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3167.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7299.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7299.HK has a market cap of 749.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7299.HK trades at HK$16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7299.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7299.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7299.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0721.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0721.HK has a market cap of 636.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0721.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0721.HK's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0721.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0721.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2825.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2825.HK has a market cap of 631.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2825.HK trades at HK$27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2825.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2825.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2825.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1226.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1226.HK has a market cap of 618.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1226.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1226.HK's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1226.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 1226.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1973.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1973.HK has a market cap of 599.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1973.HK trades at HK$3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1973.HK's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1973.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 1973.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3173.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3173.HK has a market cap of 578.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3173.HK trades at HK$7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3173.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3173.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3086.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3086.HK has a market cap of 578.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3086.HK trades at HK$46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3086.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3086.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3086.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 9011.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9011.HK has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 9011.HK trades at HK$1,189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 9011.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 9011.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 9011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0612.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0612.HK has a market cap of 523.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0612.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0612.HK's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0612.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0612.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3066.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3066.HK has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3066.HK trades at HK$36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3066.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3066.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3109.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3109.HK has a market cap of 493.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3109.HK trades at HK$9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3109.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3109.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3109.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2312.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2312.HK has a market cap of 478.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2312.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2312.HK's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2312.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 2312.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2803.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2803.HK has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2803.HK trades at HK$9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2803.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2803.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2803.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0129.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0129.HK has a market cap of 447.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0129.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0129.HK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0129.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0129.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1328.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1328.HK has a market cap of 446.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1328.HK trades at HK$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1328.HK's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1328.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 1328.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3191.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3191.HK has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3191.HK trades at HK$41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3191.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3191.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3191.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0033.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0033.HK has a market cap of 401.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0033.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0033.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0033.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0033.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3175.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3175.HK has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3175.HK trades at HK$6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3175.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3175.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2846.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2846.HK has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2846.HK trades at HK$28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2846.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2846.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2846.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7522.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7522.HK has a market cap of 285.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7522.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7522.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7522.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7522.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1835.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1835.HK has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1835.HK trades at HK$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1835.HK's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1835.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 1835.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83147.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83147.HK has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83147.HK trades at HK$7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83147.HK's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83147.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83147.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0214.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0214.HK has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0214.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0214.HK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0214.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0214.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1062.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1062.HK has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1062.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1062.HK's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1062.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 1062.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3010.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3010.HK has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3010.HK trades at HK$62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3010.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3010.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3010.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0575.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0575.HK has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0575.HK trades at HK$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0575.HK's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0575.HK's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0575.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7588.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7588.HK has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7588.HK trades at HK$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7588.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7588.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7588.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 8657.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8657.HK has a market cap of 188.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 8657.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 8657.HK's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8657.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 8657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3070.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3070.HK has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3070.HK trades at HK$35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3070.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3070.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3070.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0292.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0292.HK has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0292.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0292.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0292.HK's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0292.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2812.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2812.HK has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2812.HK trades at HK$13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2812.HK's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2812.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2812.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1217.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1217.HK has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1217.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1217.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1217.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 1217.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0913.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0913.HK has a market cap of 140.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0913.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0913.HK's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0913.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83128.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83128.HK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83128.HK trades at HK$50.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83128.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83128.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83128.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3091.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3091.HK has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3091.HK trades at HK$103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3091.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3091.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0174.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0174.HK has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0174.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0174.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0174.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0174.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3160.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3160.HK has a market cap of 124.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3160.HK trades at HK$21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3160.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3160.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 2838.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2838.HK has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 2838.HK trades at HK$166.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 2838.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2838.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 2838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7300.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7300.HK has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7300.HK trades at HK$3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7300.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7300.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7300.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3071.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3071.HK has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3071.HK trades at HK$1,123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3071.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3071.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3071.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3165.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3165.HK has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3165.HK trades at HK$17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3165.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3165.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3165.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3187.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3187.HK has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3187.HK trades at HK$16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3187.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3187.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 8025.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8025.HK has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 8025.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 8025.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8025.HK's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 8025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3141.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3141.HK has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3141.HK trades at HK$14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3141.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3141.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3141.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0080.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0080.HK has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0080.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0080.HK's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0080.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0080.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3145.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3145.HK has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3145.HK trades at HK$12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3145.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3145.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3145.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 9074.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9074.HK has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 9074.HK trades at HK$30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 9074.HK's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 9074.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 9074.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0768.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0768.HK has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0768.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0768.HK's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0768.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0768.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0204.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0204.HK has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0204.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0204.HK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0204.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0204.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0901.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0901.HK has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0901.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0901.HK's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0901.HK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0901.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 1160.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1160.HK has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 1160.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 1160.HK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1160.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 1160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83168.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83168.HK has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83168.HK trades at HK$47.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83168.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83168.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83168.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3130.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3130.HK has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3130.HK trades at HK$21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3130.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3130.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3130.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 3031.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3031.HK has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 3031.HK trades at HK$7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 3031.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3031.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 3031.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0339.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0339.HK has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0339.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0339.HK's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0339.HK's ROE of -5.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0339.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 8313.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8313.HK has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 8313.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 8313.HK's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8313.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 8313.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 7331.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7331.HK has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 7331.HK trades at HK$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 7331.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7331.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 7331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0145.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0145.HK has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0145.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0145.HK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0145.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 0145.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83122.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83122.HK has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83122.HK trades at HK$166.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83122.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83122.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83122.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 83118.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 83118.HK has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 83118.HK trades at HK$13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 83118.HK's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 83118.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 83118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 9810.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9810.HK has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 9810.HK trades at HK$8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 9810.HK's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 9810.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is more volatile compared to 9810.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 0810.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0810.HK has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 0810.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 0810.HK's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0810.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 0810.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.
1697.HK vs 9091.HK Comparison
1697.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1697.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9091.HK has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1697.HK is priced at HK$0.39, while 9091.HK trades at HK$14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1697.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.00, whereas 9091.HK's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 1697.HK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 9091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1697.HK is less volatile compared to 9091.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1697.HK.