China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1359.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1359.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1359.HK | HK$0.93 | +0.54% | 35.1B | 37.77 | HK$0.02 | +3.50% |
| 82800.HK | HK$22.30 | -1.85% | 109.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.00% |
| 2800.HK | HK$26.02 | -1.81% | 82B | -25.89 | -HK$1.00 | +2.85% |
| 2799.HK | HK$0.64 | +0.00% | 50.1B | 4.50 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 3067.HK | HK$9.68 | -3.78% | 13.4B | 18.46 | HK$0.53 | +0.83% |
| 0165.HK | HK$5.73 | -0.69% | 9.5B | -4.84 | -HK$1.17 | +1.77% |
| 82822.HK | HK$13.17 | -1.64% | 6.1B | 14.33 | HK$0.92 | +2.65% |
| 7226.HK | HK$3.23 | -7.40% | 5.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 6686.HK | HK$14.62 | +1.53% | 5B | 27.83 | HK$0.53 | N/A |
| 0133.HK | HK$24.20 | -1.94% | 3.8B | 4.06 | HK$6.15 | +10.30% |
Stock Comparison
Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (HKSE: 82800.HK)
1359.HK vs 82800.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 82800.HK has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 82800.HK trades at HK$22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 82800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 82800.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 82800.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 82800.HK's competition here
Tracker Fund Of Hong Kong (HKSE: 2800.HK)
1359.HK vs 2800.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2800.HK has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2800.HK trades at HK$26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2800.HK's P/E ratio is -25.89. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2800.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2800.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2800.HK's competition here
China CITIC Financial Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2799.HK)
1359.HK vs 2799.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2799.HK has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2799.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2799.HK's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2799.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 2799.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2799.HK's competition here
iShares Hang Seng TECH ETF (HKSE: 3067.HK)
1359.HK vs 3067.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3067.HK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3067.HK trades at HK$9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3067.HK's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3067.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3067.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3067.HK's competition here
China Everbright Limited (HKSE: 0165.HK)
1359.HK vs 0165.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0165.HK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0165.HK trades at HK$5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0165.HK's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0165.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0165.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0165.HK's competition here
CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 82822.HK)
1359.HK vs 82822.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 82822.HK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 82822.HK trades at HK$13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 82822.HK's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 82822.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 82822.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 82822.HK's competition here
CSOP Hang Seng TECH Index Daily (2x) Leveraged Product (HKSE: 7226.HK)
1359.HK vs 7226.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7226.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7226.HK trades at HK$3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7226.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7226.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 7226.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7226.HK's competition here
Noah Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6686.HK)
1359.HK vs 6686.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 6686.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 6686.HK trades at HK$14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 6686.HK's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6686.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 6686.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 6686.HK's competition here
China Merchants China Direct Investments Limited (HKSE: 0133.HK)
1359.HK vs 0133.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0133.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0133.HK trades at HK$24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0133.HK's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0133.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0133.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0133.HK's competition here
Value Partners Group Limited (HKSE: 0806.HK)
1359.HK vs 0806.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0806.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0806.HK trades at HK$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0806.HK's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0806.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0806.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0806.HK's competition here
Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund (HKSE: 2833.HK)
1359.HK vs 2833.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2833.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2833.HK trades at HK$20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2833.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2833.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2833.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2833.HK's competition here
G-Resources Group Limited (HKSE: 1051.HK)
1359.HK vs 1051.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1051.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1051.HK trades at HK$7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1051.HK's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1051.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 1051.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1051.HK's competition here
Value Gold ETF (HKSE: 3081.HK)
1359.HK vs 3081.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3081.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3081.HK trades at HK$21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3081.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3081.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3081.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3081.HK's competition here
China Vered Financial Holding Corporation Limited (HKSE: 0245.HK)
1359.HK vs 0245.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0245.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0245.HK trades at HK$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0245.HK's P/E ratio is 165.86. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0245.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0245.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0245.HK's competition here
iShares Core SENSEX India ETF HKD Counter (HKSE: 2836.HK)
1359.HK vs 2836.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2836.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2836.HK trades at HK$35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2836.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2836.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2836.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2836.HK's competition here
HK.AI Capital Limited (HKSE: 1140.HK)
1359.HK vs 1140.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1140.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1140.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1140.HK's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1140.HK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1140.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1140.HK's competition here
Shandong International Trust Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1697.HK)
1359.HK vs 1697.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1697.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1697.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1697.HK's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1697.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1697.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1697.HK's competition here
Goldstream Investment Limited (HKSE: 1328.HK)
1359.HK vs 1328.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1328.HK has a market cap of 980.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1328.HK trades at HK$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1328.HK's P/E ratio is 692.24. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1328.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1328.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1328.HK's competition here
Nanyang Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0212.HK)
1359.HK vs 0212.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0212.HK has a market cap of 968.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0212.HK trades at HK$28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0212.HK's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0212.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0212.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0212.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC MSCI Asia Pacific Real Estate ETF (HKSE: 3121.HK)
1359.HK vs 3121.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3121.HK has a market cap of 893.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3121.HK trades at HK$6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3121.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3121.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 3121.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3121.HK's competition here
XinKong International Capital Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0993.HK)
1359.HK vs 0993.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0993.HK has a market cap of 827.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0993.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0993.HK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0993.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0993.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0993.HK's competition here
Shanghai Realway Capital Assets Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1835.HK)
1359.HK vs 1835.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1835.HK has a market cap of 690M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1835.HK trades at HK$4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1835.HK's P/E ratio is -49.39. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1835.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 1835.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1835.HK's competition here
E Fund (HK) Solactive Global Gold Miner Select Index ETF (HKSE: 2824.HK)
1359.HK vs 2824.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2824.HK has a market cap of 665.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2824.HK trades at HK$12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2824.HK's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2824.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 2824.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2824.HK's competition here
CSOP ETF Series OFC - CSOP STAR 50 Index ETF (HKSE: 3109.HK)
1359.HK vs 3109.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3109.HK has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3109.HK trades at HK$15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3109.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3109.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 3109.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3109.HK's competition here
Carmen Century Investment Limited (HKSE: 0612.HK)
1359.HK vs 0612.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0612.HK has a market cap of 523.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0612.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0612.HK's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0612.HK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0612.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0612.HK's competition here
CSOP ETF Series - SZSE ChiNext (HKSE: 83147.HK)
1359.HK vs 83147.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83147.HK has a market cap of 507.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83147.HK trades at HK$11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83147.HK's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83147.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83147.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83147.HK's competition here
Tian Tu Capital Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1973.HK)
1359.HK vs 1973.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1973.HK has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1973.HK trades at HK$1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1973.HK's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1973.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1973.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1973.HK's competition here
iShares Core CSI 300 ETF (HKSE: 2846.HK)
1359.HK vs 2846.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2846.HK has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2846.HK trades at HK$36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2846.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2846.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2846.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2846.HK's competition here
Premia CSI Caixin China Bedrock Economy ETF (HKSE: 2803.HK)
1359.HK vs 2803.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2803.HK has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2803.HK trades at HK$9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2803.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2803.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2803.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2803.HK's competition here
CAI Corp (HKSE: 0080.HK)
1359.HK vs 0080.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0080.HK has a market cap of 355.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0080.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0080.HK's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0080.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0080.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0080.HK's competition here
China Investment and Finance Group Limited (HKSE: 1226.HK)
1359.HK vs 1226.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1226.HK has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1226.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1226.HK's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1226.HK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1226.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1226.HK's competition here
WebX Holding Group Limited (HKSE: 0339.HK)
1359.HK vs 0339.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0339.HK has a market cap of 293.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0339.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0339.HK's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0339.HK's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0339.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0339.HK's competition here
Asia Standard International Group Limited (HKSE: 0129.HK)
1359.HK vs 0129.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0129.HK has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0129.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0129.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0129.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0129.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0129.HK's competition here
China Financial International Investments Limited (HKSE: 0721.HK)
1359.HK vs 0721.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0721.HK has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0721.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0721.HK's P/E ratio is -87.29. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0721.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0721.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0721.HK's competition here
International Genius Company (HKSE: 0033.HK)
1359.HK vs 0033.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0033.HK has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0033.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0033.HK's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0033.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0033.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0033.HK's competition here
Global X China Consumer Brand ETF (HKSE: 2806.HK)
1359.HK vs 2806.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2806.HK has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2806.HK trades at HK$40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2806.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2806.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2806.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2806.HK's competition here
Asia Orient Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0214.HK)
1359.HK vs 0214.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0214.HK has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0214.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0214.HK's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0214.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0214.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0214.HK's competition here
Long Investment Corp (HKSE: 2312.HK)
1359.HK vs 2312.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2312.HK has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2312.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2312.HK's P/E ratio is -55.56. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2312.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 2312.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2312.HK's competition here
Goldstone Capital Group Limited (HKSE: 1160.HK)
1359.HK vs 1160.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1160.HK has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1160.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1160.HK's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1160.HK's ROE of -2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1160.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1160.HK's competition here
Asia Standard Hotel Group Limited (HKSE: 0292.HK)
1359.HK vs 0292.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0292.HK has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0292.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0292.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0292.HK's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0292.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0292.HK's competition here
Tai United Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0718.HK)
1359.HK vs 0718.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0718.HK has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0718.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0718.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0718.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0718.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0718.HK's competition here
Walnut Capital Limited (HKSE: 0905.HK)
1359.HK vs 0905.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0905.HK has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0905.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0905.HK's P/E ratio is -29.52. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0905.HK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0905.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0905.HK's competition here
NikkoAM Metaverse Theme Active ETF (HKSE: 3091.HK)
1359.HK vs 3091.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3091.HK has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3091.HK trades at HK$103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3091.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3091.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3091.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3091.HK's competition here
True Partner Capital Holding Limited (HKSE: 8657.HK)
1359.HK vs 8657.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 8657.HK has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 8657.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 8657.HK's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8657.HK's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 8657.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 8657.HK's competition here
Asian Capital Resources (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 8025.HK)
1359.HK vs 8025.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 8025.HK has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 8025.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 8025.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8025.HK's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 8025.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 8025.HK's competition here
Prosperity Investment Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0310.HK)
1359.HK vs 0310.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0310.HK has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0310.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0310.HK's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0310.HK's ROE of -32.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0310.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0310.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC NASDAQ100 Index Daily (2x) Leveraged Product ETF (HKSE: 7261.HK)
1359.HK vs 7261.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7261.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7261.HK trades at HK$52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7261.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7261.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 7261.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7261.HK's competition here
CSOP Levd. & Invr. Ser. - Hang Seng China Enterprises (-2) (HKSE: 7588.HK)
1359.HK vs 7588.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7588.HK has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7588.HK trades at HK$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7588.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7588.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 7588.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7588.HK's competition here
Harbour Digital Asset Capital Limited (HKSE: 0913.HK)
1359.HK vs 0913.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0913.HK has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0913.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0913.HK's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0913.HK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0913.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0913.HK's competition here
Hang Seng RBM Gold ETF (HKSE: 83168.HK)
1359.HK vs 83168.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83168.HK has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83168.HK trades at HK$54.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83168.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83168.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83168.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83168.HK's competition here
Pando Ethereum ETF (HKSE: 3085.HK)
1359.HK vs 3085.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3085.HK has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3085.HK trades at HK$6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3085.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3085.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3085.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3085.HK's competition here
Hang Seng Harvest CSI 300 Index ETF (HKSE: 3130.HK)
1359.HK vs 3130.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3130.HK has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3130.HK trades at HK$21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3130.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3130.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3130.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3130.HK's competition here
ZACD Group Ltd. (HKSE: 8313.HK)
1359.HK vs 8313.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 8313.HK has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 8313.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 8313.HK's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8313.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 8313.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 8313.HK's competition here
UBA Investments Limited (HKSE: 0768.HK)
1359.HK vs 0768.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0768.HK has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0768.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0768.HK's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0768.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0768.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0768.HK's competition here
Ficamndq100 (HKSE: 7331.HK)
1359.HK vs 7331.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7331.HK has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7331.HK trades at HK$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7331.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7331.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 7331.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7331.HK's competition here
Global X ETF Series II - Global X S&P Crude Oil Futures Enhanced ER ETF (HKSE: 3097.HK)
1359.HK vs 3097.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3097.HK has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3097.HK trades at HK$8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3097.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3097.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3097.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3097.HK's competition here
CSOP CSI 500 ETF (HKSE: 83005.HK)
1359.HK vs 83005.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83005.HK has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83005.HK trades at HK$22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83005.HK's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83005.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 83005.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83005.HK's competition here
NikkoAM Metaverse Theme Active ETF (HKSE: 9091.HK)
1359.HK vs 9091.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9091.HK has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9091.HK trades at HK$14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9091.HK's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 9091.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9091.HK's competition here
Capital Realm Financial Holdings Group Limited (HKSE: 0204.HK)
1359.HK vs 0204.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0204.HK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0204.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0204.HK's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0204.HK's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0204.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0204.HK's competition here
Xicsopcsi300 (HKSE: 7333.HK)
1359.HK vs 7333.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7333.HK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7333.HK trades at HK$6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7333.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7333.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 7333.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7333.HK's competition here
AMUNDI FTSE CHINA A50 INDEX ETF - Counter RMB (HKSE: 82843.HK)
1359.HK vs 82843.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 82843.HK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 82843.HK trades at HK$14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 82843.HK's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 82843.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 82843.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 82843.HK's competition here
Xi Csop A50 (HKSE: 7348.HK)
1359.HK vs 7348.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7348.HK has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7348.HK trades at HK$8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7348.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7348.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 7348.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7348.HK's competition here
Amova Global Internet Index ETF (HKSE: 9072.HK)
1359.HK vs 9072.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9072.HK has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9072.HK trades at HK$25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9072.HK's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9072.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 9072.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9072.HK's competition here
China Castson 81 Finance Company Limited (HKSE: 0810.HK)
1359.HK vs 0810.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0810.HK has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0810.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0810.HK's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0810.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0810.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0810.HK's competition here
W.I.S.E. SSE 50 China Tracker (HKSE: 3024.HK)
1359.HK vs 3024.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3024.HK has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3024.HK trades at HK$31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3024.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3024.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3024.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3024.HK's competition here
SSIF DCE Iron Ore Futures Index ETF (HKSE: 9047.HK)
1359.HK vs 9047.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9047.HK has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9047.HK trades at HK$2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9047.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9047.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 9047.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9047.HK's competition here
AMUNDI HANG SENG HK 35 INDEX ETF - Counter RMB (HKSE: 83012.HK)
1359.HK vs 83012.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83012.HK has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83012.HK trades at HK$17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83012.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83012.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83012.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83012.HK's competition here
Premia US Treasury Floating Rate ETF (HKSE: 9077.HK)
1359.HK vs 9077.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9077.HK has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9077.HK trades at HK$504.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9077.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9077.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 9077.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9077.HK's competition here
Premia Asia Innovative Technology and Metaverse Theme ETF (HKSE: 9181.HK)
1359.HK vs 9181.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9181.HK has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9181.HK trades at HK$20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9181.HK's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9181.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 9181.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9181.HK's competition here
Shanghai International Shanghai Growth Investment Limited (HKSE: 0770.HK)
1359.HK vs 0770.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0770.HK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0770.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0770.HK's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0770.HK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0770.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0770.HK's competition here
Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index Etf (HKSE: 3466.HK)
1359.HK vs 3466.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3466.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3466.HK trades at HK$20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3466.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3466.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3466.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3466.HK's competition here
iShares Asia Trust - iShares Core KOSPI 200 Index ETF (HKSE: 9170.HK)
1359.HK vs 9170.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9170.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9170.HK trades at HK$19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9170.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9170.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 9170.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9170.HK's competition here
CICC Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury 1-10 Years ETF (HKSE: 83079.HK)
1359.HK vs 83079.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83079.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83079.HK trades at HK$120.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83079.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83079.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83079.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83079.HK's competition here
Haitong CSI300 Index ETF (HKSE: 82811.HK)
1359.HK vs 82811.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 82811.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 82811.HK trades at HK$11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 82811.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 82811.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 82811.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 82811.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC Direxion CSI 300 Index Daily (2x) Leveraged Product (HKSE: 7272.HK)
1359.HK vs 7272.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7272.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7272.HK trades at HK$6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7272.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7272.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 7272.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7272.HK's competition here
China Capital Corporation (Hong Kong) Limited - Kraneshares CSI China Internet Index Fund (HKSE: 9186.HK)
1359.HK vs 9186.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 9186.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 9186.HK trades at HK$6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 9186.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9186.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 9186.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 9186.HK's competition here
Good Resources Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0109.HK)
1359.HK vs 0109.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0109.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0109.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0109.HK's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0109.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 0109.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0109.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC Direxion CSI 300 Index Daily (-1x) Inverse Product (HKSE: 7373.HK)
1359.HK vs 7373.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 7373.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 7373.HK trades at HK$5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 7373.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7373.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 7373.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 7373.HK's competition here
Global X Semiconductor ETF (HKSE: 2243.HK)
1359.HK vs 2243.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 2243.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 2243.HK trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 2243.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2243.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is not fully comparable compared to 2243.HK. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 2243.HK's competition here
Vanguard ETF Series - Vanguard FTSE Japan Index ETF (HKSE: 3126.HK)
1359.HK vs 3126.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3126.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3126.HK trades at HK$30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3126.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3126.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3126.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3126.HK's competition here
National Investments Fund Limited (HKSE: 1227.HK)
1359.HK vs 1227.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 1227.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 1227.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 1227.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1227.HK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 1227.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 1227.HK's competition here
CSOP MSCI China A International ETF (HKSE: 83149.HK)
1359.HK vs 83149.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83149.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83149.HK trades at HK$11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83149.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83149.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83149.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83149.HK's competition here
China Lumena New Materials Corp. (HKSE: 0067.HK)
1359.HK vs 0067.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 0067.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 0067.HK trades at HK$25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 0067.HK's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0067.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 0067.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 0067.HK's competition here
China Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited - China AMC MSCI China A Inclusion Index ETF (HKSE: 83197.HK)
1359.HK vs 83197.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83197.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83197.HK trades at HK$11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83197.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83197.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83197.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83197.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC Hang Seng Stock Connect Hong Kong SmallCap Index ETF (HKSE: 3157.HK)
1359.HK vs 3157.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3157.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3157.HK trades at HK$21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3157.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3157.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 3157.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3157.HK's competition here
8088 Investment Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8088.HK)
1359.HK vs 8088.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 8088.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 8088.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 8088.HK's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8088.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 8088.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 8088.HK's competition here
Ping An of China CSI 5-10Y CGB ETF (HKSE: 3080.HK)
1359.HK vs 3080.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3080.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3080.HK trades at HK$118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3080.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3080.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3080.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3080.HK's competition here
Ping An Nasdaq 5HANDL ETF (HKSE: 3198.HK)
1359.HK vs 3198.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3198.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3198.HK trades at HK$90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3198.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3198.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is less volatile compared to 3198.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3198.HK's competition here
Vanguard ETF Series - Vanguard Total China Index ETF (HKSE: 83169.HK)
1359.HK vs 83169.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 83169.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 83169.HK trades at HK$9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 83169.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 83169.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 83169.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 83169.HK's competition here
Ping An MSCI China Quality Factor ETF (HKSE: 3166.HK)
1359.HK vs 3166.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3166.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3166.HK trades at HK$28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3166.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3166.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3166.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3166.HK's competition here
Ping An Nasdaq AI and Robotics ETF (HKSE: 3023.HK)
1359.HK vs 3023.HK Comparison August 2026
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1359.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1359.HK stands at 35.1B. In comparison, 3023.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1359.HK is priced at HK$0.93 on the HKSE, while 3023.HK trades at HK$105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1359.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas 3023.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1359.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3023.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1359.HK is more volatile compared to 3023.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1359.HK.Check 3023.HK's competition here