iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 2823.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 2823.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2823.HK | HK$17.16 | -0.52% | 60.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.19% |
| 2828.HK | HK$85.96 | +0.09% | 42B | N/A | N/A | +1.41% |
| 3033.HK | HK$4.62 | +0.22% | 37.8B | 18.55 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 82828.HK | HK$74.40 | +0.43% | 27.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.44% |
| 83188.HK | HK$48.64 | -0.16% | 16.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.15% |
| 2827.HK | HK$48.32 | -0.29% | 6.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3032.HK | HK$4.70 | +0.26% | 3.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 83010.HK | HK$74.32 | -1.67% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.96% |
| 3115.HK | HK$92.76 | +0.17% | 2.3B | 12.73 | HK$7.20 | +2.63% |
| 2801.HK | HK$24.18 | +0.25% | 2.3B | 12.83 | HK$1.86 | +2.06% |
Stock Comparison
Hang Seng China Enterprises Index ETF (HKSE: 2828.HK)
2823.HK vs 2828.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2828.HK has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2828.HK trades at HK$85.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2828.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2828.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 2828.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2828.HK's competition here
CSOP Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (HKSE: 3033.HK)
2823.HK vs 3033.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3033.HK has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3033.HK trades at HK$4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3033.HK's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3033.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3033.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3033.HK's competition here
Hang Seng China Enterprises Index ETF (HKSE: 82828.HK)
2823.HK vs 82828.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 82828.HK has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 82828.HK trades at HK$74.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 82828.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 82828.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 82828.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 82828.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC CSI 300 Index ETF HKD (HKSE: 83188.HK)
2823.HK vs 83188.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 83188.HK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 83188.HK trades at HK$48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 83188.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 83188.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 83188.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 83188.HK's competition here
W.I.S.E. - CSI 300 China Tracker (HKSE: 2827.HK)
2823.HK vs 2827.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2827.HK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2827.HK trades at HK$48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2827.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2827.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 2827.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2827.HK's competition here
Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (HKSE: 3032.HK)
2823.HK vs 3032.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3032.HK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3032.HK trades at HK$4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3032.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3032.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3032.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3032.HK's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Asia ex Japan ETF (HKSE: 83010.HK)
2823.HK vs 83010.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 83010.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 83010.HK trades at HK$74.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 83010.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 83010.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 83010.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 83010.HK's competition here
iShares Core Hang Seng Index ETF (HKSE: 3115.HK)
2823.HK vs 3115.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3115.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3115.HK trades at HK$92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3115.HK's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3115.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3115.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3115.HK's competition here
iShares Core MSCI China ETF (HKSE: 2801.HK)
2823.HK vs 2801.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2801.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2801.HK trades at HK$24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2801.HK's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2801.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 2801.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2801.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC Hang Seng TECH Index ETF HKD (HKSE: 3088.HK)
2823.HK vs 3088.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3088.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3088.HK trades at HK$5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3088.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3088.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3088.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3088.HK's competition here
Global X China Semiconductor ETF (HKD) (HKSE: 3191.HK)
2823.HK vs 3191.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3191.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3191.HK trades at HK$96.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3191.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3191.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3191.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3191.HK's competition here
Global X MSCI China ETF (HKD) (HKSE: 3040.HK)
2823.HK vs 3040.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3040.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3040.HK trades at HK$33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3040.HK's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3040.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3040.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3040.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC NASDAQ 100 ETF HKD (HKSE: 3086.HK)
2823.HK vs 3086.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3086.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3086.HK trades at HK$58.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3086.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3086.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3086.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3086.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC MSCI Japan Hedged to USD ETF (HKSE: 3160.HK)
2823.HK vs 3160.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3160.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3160.HK trades at HK$32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3160.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3160.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3160.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3160.HK's competition here
ICBC CSOP S&P New China Sectors ETF (HKSE: 3167.HK)
2823.HK vs 3167.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3167.HK has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3167.HK trades at HK$59.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3167.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3167.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3167.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3167.HK's competition here
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery ETF (HKD) (HKSE: 2845.HK)
2823.HK vs 2845.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2845.HK has a market cap of 853.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2845.HK trades at HK$97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2845.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2845.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 2845.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2845.HK's competition here
Premia CSI Caixin China New Economy ETF (HKSE: 3173.HK)
2823.HK vs 3173.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3173.HK has a market cap of 674.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3173.HK trades at HK$10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3173.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3173.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3173.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3173.HK's competition here
W.I.S.E. - CSI HK 100 Tracker (HKSE: 2825.HK)
2823.HK vs 2825.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2825.HK has a market cap of 667M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2825.HK trades at HK$29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2825.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2825.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 2825.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2825.HK's competition here
Global X China Biotech ETF (HKD) (HKSE: 2820.HK)
2823.HK vs 2820.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2820.HK has a market cap of 630.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2820.HK trades at HK$69.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2820.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2820.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 2820.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2820.HK's competition here
Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (HKD) (HKSE: 2807.HK)
2823.HK vs 2807.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2807.HK has a market cap of 477.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2807.HK trades at HK$54.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2807.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2807.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 2807.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2807.HK's competition here
Global X China Clean Energy ETF (HKD) * (HKSE: 2809.HK)
2823.HK vs 2809.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2809.HK has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2809.HK trades at HK$102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2809.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2809.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is similarly volatile compared to 2809.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2809.HK's competition here
SPDR FTSE Greater China ETF (HKSE: 3073.HK)
2823.HK vs 3073.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3073.HK has a market cap of 404.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3073.HK trades at HK$40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3073.HK's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3073.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3073.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3073.HK's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Asia ex Japan ETF (HKSE: 3010.HK)
2823.HK vs 3010.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3010.HK has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3010.HK trades at HK$86.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3010.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3010.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3010.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3010.HK's competition here
Hang Seng China A Industry Top Index ETF (HKSE: 83128.HK)
2823.HK vs 83128.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 83128.HK has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 83128.HK trades at HK$57.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 83128.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 83128.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 83128.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 83128.HK's competition here
Samsung CSI China Dragon Internet ETF (HKSE: 2812.HK)
2823.HK vs 2812.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2812.HK has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2812.HK trades at HK$11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2812.HK's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2812.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 2812.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2812.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC MSCI Europe Quality Hedged to USD ETF (HKSE: 3165.HK)
2823.HK vs 3165.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3165.HK has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3165.HK trades at HK$19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3165.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3165.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3165.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3165.HK's competition here
Hang Seng FTSE China 50 Index ETF (HKSE: 2838.HK)
2823.HK vs 2838.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2838.HK has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2838.HK trades at HK$158.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2838.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2838.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 2838.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2838.HK's competition here
CSOP Huatai-PineBridge CSI A500 ETF (HKSE: 3101.HK)
2823.HK vs 3101.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3101.HK has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3101.HK trades at HK$8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3101.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3101.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3101.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3101.HK's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Taiwan ETF (HKSE: 9074.HK)
2823.HK vs 9074.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 9074.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 9074.HK trades at HK$57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9074.HK's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9074.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 9074.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 9074.HK's competition here
Fullgoal ETF Series - Fullgoal Hang Seng HK High Dividend ETF (HKSE: 3031.HK)
2823.HK vs 3031.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3031.HK has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3031.HK trades at HK$9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3031.HK's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3031.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3031.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3031.HK's competition here
Harvest MSCI China A Index ETF (HKSE: 83118.HK)
2823.HK vs 83118.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 83118.HK has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 83118.HK trades at HK$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 83118.HK's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 83118.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 83118.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 83118.HK's competition here
Premia Dow Jones Emerging ASEAN Titans 100 ETF (HKSE: 9810.HK)
2823.HK vs 9810.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 9810.HK has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 9810.HK trades at HK$9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9810.HK's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9810.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 9810.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 9810.HK's competition here
Bosera STAR 50 Index ETF (HKSE: 82832.HK)
2823.HK vs 82832.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 82832.HK has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 82832.HK trades at HK$11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 82832.HK's P/E ratio is 49.47. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 82832.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 82832.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 82832.HK's competition here
Premia MSCI Vietnam ETF (HKSE: 9804.HK)
2823.HK vs 9804.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 9804.HK has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 9804.HK trades at HK$11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9804.HK's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9804.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 9804.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 9804.HK's competition here
ChinaAMC HK-US AI ETF (HKSE: 3140.HK)
2823.HK vs 3140.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3140.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3140.HK trades at HK$7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3140.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3140.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 3140.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3140.HK's competition here
Global X CSI 300 ETF (HKSE: 83127.HK)
2823.HK vs 83127.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 83127.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 83127.HK trades at HK$12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 83127.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 83127.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is less volatile compared to 83127.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 83127.HK's competition here
E Fund (HK) CSI 300 A-Share Index ETF (HKSE: 83100.HK)
2823.HK vs 83100.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 83100.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 83100.HK trades at HK$35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 83100.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 83100.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 83100.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 83100.HK's competition here
China Assets (HKSE: 0170.HK)
2823.HK vs 0170.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 0170.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 0170.HK trades at HK$6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0170.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0170.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 0170.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 0170.HK's competition here
Hang Seng S&P 500 Index ETF HKD Counter (HKSE: 3195.HK)
2823.HK vs 3195.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 3195.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 3195.HK trades at HK$11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3195.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3195.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 3195.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 3195.HK's competition here
Galaxy Bosera MSCI China ASEAN Economic Linkage Select Index ETF (HKSE: 2805.HK)
2823.HK vs 2805.HK Comparison July 2026
iShares FTSE China A50 ETF (HKSE: 2823.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2823.HK stands at 60.1B. In comparison, 2805.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2823.HK is priced at HK$17.16 on the HKSE, while 2805.HK trades at HK$9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2823.HK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2805.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2823.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2805.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2823.HK is more volatile compared to 2805.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2823.HK.Check 2805.HK's competition here