G-Resources Group Limited (1051.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1051.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051.HK | HK$8.20 | +1.61% | 3.7B | 4.84 | HK$1.71 | +1.45% |
| 82800.HK | HK$20.68 | -1.15% | 110.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.26% |
| 2800.HK | HK$23.80 | -1.49% | 74.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.12% |
| 2799.HK | HK$0.61 | -8.96% | 51.4B | 4.27 | HK$0.15 | N/A |
| 1359.HK | HK$1.00 | -5.66% | 38.9B | 17.00 | HK$0.06 | +2.56% |
| 0165.HK | HK$5.55 | -5.93% | 9.4B | -4.66 | -HK$1.19 | +1.80% |
| 6686.HK | HK$15.92 | -0.50% | 5.2B | 8.99 | HK$1.77 | N/A |
| 0806.HK | HK$2.00 | -4.76% | 3.7B | 5.49 | HK$0.37 | +2.71% |
| 2833.HK | HK$20.08 | -0.69% | 3.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0133.HK | HK$19.00 | +0.64% | 2.9B | 1.95 | HK$9.77 | +13.51% |
Stock Comparison
1051.HK vs 82800.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 82800.HK has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 82800.HK trades at HK$20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 82800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 82800.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 82800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 82800.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2800.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2800.HK has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2800.HK trades at HK$23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2800.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 2800.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2799.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2799.HK has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2799.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2799.HK's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2799.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 2799.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 2799.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1359.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1359.HK has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1359.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1359.HK's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1359.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1359.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1359.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0165.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0165.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0165.HK trades at HK$5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0165.HK's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0165.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0165.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0165.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 6686.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6686.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 6686.HK trades at HK$15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 6686.HK's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6686.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 6686.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 6686.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0806.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0806.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0806.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0806.HK's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0806.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0806.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0806.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2833.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2833.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2833.HK trades at HK$20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2833.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2833.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2833.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 2833.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0133.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0133.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0133.HK trades at HK$19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0133.HK's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0133.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0133.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0133.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3081.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3081.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3081.HK trades at HK$19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3081.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3081.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3081.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3081.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0245.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0245.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0245.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0245.HK's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0245.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0245.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0245.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1140.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1140.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1140.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1140.HK's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1140.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1140.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1140.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1697.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1697.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1697.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1697.HK's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1697.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1697.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1697.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1328.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1328.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1328.HK trades at HK$4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1328.HK's P/E ratio is 756.32. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1328.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1328.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1328.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3109.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3109.HK has a market cap of 578M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3109.HK trades at HK$19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3109.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3109.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 3109.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3109.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83147.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83147.HK has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83147.HK trades at HK$14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83147.HK's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83147.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 83147.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83147.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2803.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2803.HK has a market cap of 529.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2803.HK trades at HK$10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2803.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2803.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 2803.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 2803.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0612.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0612.HK has a market cap of 523.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0612.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0612.HK's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0612.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0612.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0612.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2824.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2824.HK has a market cap of 467M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2824.HK trades at HK$8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2824.HK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2824.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 2824.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 2824.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1226.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1226.HK has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1226.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1226.HK's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1226.HK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 1226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1226.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0080.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0080.HK has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0080.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0080.HK's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0080.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0080.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0080.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1973.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1973.HK has a market cap of 346.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1973.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1973.HK's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1973.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1973.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1973.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0339.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0339.HK has a market cap of 319.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0339.HK trades at HK$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0339.HK's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0339.HK's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0339.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0339.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0575.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0575.HK has a market cap of 286M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0575.HK trades at HK$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0575.HK's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0575.HK's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0575.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0575.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0129.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0129.HK has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0129.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0129.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0129.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0129.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0129.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0033.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0033.HK has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0033.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0033.HK's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0033.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0033.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0033.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1062.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1062.HK has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1062.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1062.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1062.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1062.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1062.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1835.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1835.HK has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1835.HK trades at HK$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1835.HK's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1835.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1835.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1835.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0214.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0214.HK has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0214.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0214.HK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0214.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0214.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0214.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0905.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0905.HK has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0905.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0905.HK's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0905.HK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0905.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0905.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0292.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0292.HK has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0292.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0292.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0292.HK's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0292.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0292.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0174.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0174.HK has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0174.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0174.HK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0174.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0174.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0174.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2312.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2312.HK has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2312.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2312.HK's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2312.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 2312.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 2312.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3091.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3091.HK has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3091.HK trades at HK$103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3091.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3091.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3091.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1217.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1217.HK has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1217.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1217.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1217.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 1217.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1217.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 8657.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8657.HK has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 8657.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 8657.HK's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8657.HK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 8657.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 8657.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1160.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1160.HK has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1160.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1160.HK's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1160.HK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1160.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1160.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 8025.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8025.HK has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 8025.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 8025.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8025.HK's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 8025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 8025.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0721.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0721.HK has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0721.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0721.HK's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0721.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0721.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0721.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83168.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83168.HK has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83168.HK trades at HK$56.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83168.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83168.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 83168.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83168.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 8313.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8313.HK has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 8313.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 8313.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8313.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 8313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 8313.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0913.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0913.HK has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0913.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0913.HK's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0913.HK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0913.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3130.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3130.HK has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3130.HK trades at HK$21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3130.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3130.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3130.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3130.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0768.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0768.HK has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0768.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0768.HK's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0768.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0768.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0768.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0145.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0145.HK has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0145.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0145.HK's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0145.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0145.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0145.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 7331.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7331.HK has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 7331.HK trades at HK$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 7331.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7331.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 7331.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9091.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9091.HK has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9091.HK trades at HK$14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9091.HK's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 9091.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9091.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 7333.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7333.HK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 7333.HK trades at HK$6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 7333.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7333.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7333.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 7333.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 7348.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7348.HK has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 7348.HK trades at HK$8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 7348.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7348.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7348.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 7348.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9072.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9072.HK has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9072.HK trades at HK$25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9072.HK's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9072.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9072.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9072.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0310.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0310.HK has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0310.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0310.HK's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0310.HK's ROE of -32.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0310.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0310.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 82843.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 82843.HK has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 82843.HK trades at HK$14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 82843.HK's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 82843.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 82843.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 82843.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0810.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0810.HK has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0810.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0810.HK's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0810.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0810.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0810.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9047.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9047.HK has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9047.HK trades at HK$2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9047.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9047.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9047.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9047.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0204.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0204.HK has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0204.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0204.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0204.HK's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0204.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0204.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83012.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83012.HK has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83012.HK trades at HK$17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83012.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83012.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83012.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83012.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9077.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9077.HK has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9077.HK trades at HK$504.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9077.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9077.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9077.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9077.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9181.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9181.HK has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9181.HK trades at HK$21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9181.HK's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9181.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 9181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9181.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0770.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0770.HK has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0770.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0770.HK's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0770.HK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0770.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0770.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 8088.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8088.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 8088.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 8088.HK's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8088.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 8088.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 8088.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 2243.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2243.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 2243.HK trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 2243.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2243.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 1051.HK has daily volatility of 1.58 and 2243.HK has daily volatility of N/A.Check 2243.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83197.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83197.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83197.HK trades at HK$11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83197.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83197.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83197.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83197.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 7272.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7272.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 7272.HK trades at HK$6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 7272.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7272.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 7272.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 7272.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9186.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9186.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9186.HK trades at HK$6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9186.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9186.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 9186.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9186.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83079.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83079.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83079.HK trades at HK$120.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83079.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83079.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83079.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83079.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 82811.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 82811.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 82811.HK trades at HK$11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 82811.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 82811.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 82811.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 82811.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0067.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0067.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0067.HK trades at HK$25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0067.HK's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0067.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0067.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0067.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 9170.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9170.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 9170.HK trades at HK$19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 9170.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9170.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9170.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 9170.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 7373.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7373.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 7373.HK trades at HK$5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 7373.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7373.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7373.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 7373.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 1227.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1227.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 1227.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 1227.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1227.HK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1227.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 1227.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 0109.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 0109.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 0109.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 0109.HK's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0109.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0109.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 0109.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3080.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3080.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3080.HK trades at HK$118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3080.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3080.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3080.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3080.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83169.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83169.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83169.HK trades at HK$9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83169.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83169.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 83169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83169.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3157.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3157.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3157.HK trades at HK$21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3157.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3157.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 3157.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3157.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 83149.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 83149.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 83149.HK trades at HK$11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 83149.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 83149.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83149.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 83149.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3023.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3023.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3023.HK trades at HK$105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3023.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3023.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3023.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3166.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3166.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3166.HK trades at HK$28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3166.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3166.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 3166.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3166.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3126.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3126.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3126.HK trades at HK$30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3126.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3126.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3126.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3126.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3198.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3198.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3198.HK trades at HK$90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3198.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3198.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 3198.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3198.HK's competition here
1051.HK vs 3121.HK Comparison June 2026
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3121.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at HK$8.20, while 3121.HK trades at HK$7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas 3121.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3121.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 3121.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.Check 3121.HK's competition here