Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. 1658.HK Peers
See (1658.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1658.HK | $5.06 | +0.40% | 480.09B | 5.82 | $0.87 | +10.41% |
| 3968.HK | $49.35 | +1.23% | 1.22T | 8.09 | $6.10 | +4.81% |
| 0998.HK | $6.61 | +1.23% | 433.33B | 5.16 | $1.28 | +9.26% |
| 2388.HK | $33.55 | +0.30% | 354.72B | 9.27 | $3.62 | +5.99% |
| 6818.HK | $3.67 | +1.38% | 247.91B | 5.40 | $0.68 | +9.05% |
| 0011.HK | $109.80 | +0.18% | 206.67B | 11.77 | $9.33 | +6.30% |
| 1988.HK | $3.95 | +1.80% | 193.77B | 5.90 | $0.67 | +10.59% |
| 2016.HK | $2.83 | +1.43% | 90.32B | 5.05 | $0.56 | +7.01% |
| 3618.HK | $6.82 | +0.29% | 87.57B | 6.37 | $1.07 | +7.15% |
| 3698.HK | $3.15 | -0.63% | 41.14B | 2.76 | $1.14 | +5.48% |
Stock Comparison
1658.HK vs 3968.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 3968.HK has a market cap of 1.22T. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 3968.HK trades at $49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 3968.HK's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3968.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 3968.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 0998.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 0998.HK has a market cap of 433.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 0998.HK trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 0998.HK's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0998.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK and 0998.HK have similar daily volatility (1.98).
1658.HK vs 2388.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 2388.HK has a market cap of 354.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 2388.HK trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 2388.HK's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2388.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 2388.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 6818.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 6818.HK has a market cap of 247.91B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 6818.HK trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 6818.HK's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6818.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 6818.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 0011.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 0011.HK has a market cap of 206.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 0011.HK trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 0011.HK's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0011.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 0011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1988.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1988.HK has a market cap of 193.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1988.HK trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1988.HK's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1988.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 1988.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 2016.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 2016.HK has a market cap of 90.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 2016.HK trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 2016.HK's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2016.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 2016.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 3618.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 3618.HK has a market cap of 87.57B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 3618.HK trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 3618.HK's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 3618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 3698.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 3698.HK has a market cap of 41.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 3698.HK trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 3698.HK's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3698.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 3698.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1963.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1963.HK has a market cap of 36.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1963.HK trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1963.HK's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1963.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 1963.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 0023.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 0023.HK has a market cap of 30.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 0023.HK trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 0023.HK's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0023.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 0023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 3866.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 3866.HK has a market cap of 27.56B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 3866.HK trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 3866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3866.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 3866.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 9889.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 9889.HK has a market cap of 25.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 9889.HK trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 9889.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9889.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 9889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1551.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1551.HK has a market cap of 24.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1551.HK trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1551.HK's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1551.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 1551.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 0416.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 0416.HK has a market cap of 19.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 0416.HK trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 0416.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0416.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 0416.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 9677.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 9677.HK has a market cap of 17.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 9677.HK trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 9677.HK's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9677.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 9677.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 9668.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 9668.HK has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 9668.HK trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 9668.HK's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9668.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 9668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 6196.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 6196.HK has a market cap of 16.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 6196.HK trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 6196.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6196.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 6196.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 6199.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 6199.HK has a market cap of 14.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 6199.HK trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 6199.HK's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6199.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 6199.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 6190.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 6190.HK has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 6190.HK trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 6190.HK's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6190.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 6190.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 2356.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 2356.HK has a market cap of 12.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 2356.HK trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 2356.HK's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2356.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 2356.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1578.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1578.HK has a market cap of 12.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1578.HK trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1578.HK's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1578.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 1578.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1216.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1216.HK has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1216.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1216.HK's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1216.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 1216.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 0440.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 0440.HK has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 0440.HK trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 0440.HK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0440.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 0440.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 2066.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 2066.HK has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 2066.HK trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 2066.HK's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2066.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 2066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 2558.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 2558.HK has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 2558.HK trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 2558.HK's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2558.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 2558.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1916.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1916.HK has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1916.HK trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1916.HK's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1916.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 1916.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1983.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1983.HK has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1983.HK trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1983.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1983.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 1983.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 2139.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 2139.HK has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 2139.HK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 2139.HK's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2139.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 2139.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 6138.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 6138.HK has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 6138.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 6138.HK's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6138.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 6138.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 6122.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 6122.HK has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 6122.HK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 6122.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6122.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 6122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 0626.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 0626.HK has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 0626.HK trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 0626.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0626.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is less volatile compared to 0626.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.
1658.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison
1658.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1658.HK stands at 480.09B. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 151.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 1658.HK is priced at $5.06, while 1111.HK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1658.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, 1658.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1658.HK is more volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1658.HK.