G-Resources Group Limited
G-Resources Group Limited 1051.HK Peers
See (1051.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051.HK | $8.69 | +2.00% | 3.92B | 10.60 | $0.82 | +1.38% |
| 82800.HK | $21.84 | -0.09% | 164.24B | N/A | N/A | +3.24% |
| 2800.HK | $23.82 | +0.25% | 75.18B | N/A | N/A | +3.53% |
| 2799.HK | $0.80 | +1.27% | 62.61B | 6.67 | $0.12 | N/A |
| 2823.HK | $14.25 | -0.35% | 50.33B | N/A | N/A | +1.95% |
| 2828.HK | $88.34 | -0.18% | 43.55B | N/A | N/A | +1.81% |
| 3033.HK | $5.14 | -0.68% | 42.76B | 19.29 | $0.27 | N/A |
| 1359.HK | $1.02 | -0.97% | 39.68B | 25.50 | $0.04 | +5.37% |
| 82828.HK | $81.04 | -1.05% | 24.79B | N/A | N/A | +1.81% |
| 82823.HK | $13.09 | -0.76% | 15.74B | 12.46 | $1.05 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
1051.HK vs 82800.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 82800.HK has a market cap of 164.24B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 82800.HK trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 82800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 82800.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 82800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2800.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2800.HK has a market cap of 75.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2800.HK trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2800.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2800.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2799.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2799.HK has a market cap of 62.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2799.HK trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2799.HK's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2799.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2823.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2823.HK has a market cap of 50.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2823.HK trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2823.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2823.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2823.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2828.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2828.HK has a market cap of 43.55B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2828.HK trades at $88.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2828.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2828.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3033.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3033.HK has a market cap of 42.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3033.HK trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3033.HK's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3033.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1359.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1359.HK has a market cap of 39.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1359.HK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1359.HK's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1359.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 1359.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 82828.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 82828.HK has a market cap of 24.79B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 82828.HK trades at $81.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 82828.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 82828.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 82828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 82823.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 82823.HK has a market cap of 15.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 82823.HK trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 82823.HK's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 82823.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 82823.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3067.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3067.HK has a market cap of 14.53B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3067.HK trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3067.HK's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3067.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3067.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83188.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83188.HK has a market cap of 13.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83188.HK trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83188.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83188.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83188.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 82822.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 82822.HK has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 82822.HK trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 82822.HK's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 82822.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 82822.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3040.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3040.HK has a market cap of 8.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3040.HK trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3040.HK's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3040.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3040.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3053.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3053.HK has a market cap of 7.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3053.HK trades at $1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3053.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3053.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3053.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0165.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0165.HK has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0165.HK trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0165.HK's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0165.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0165.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7552.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7552.HK has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7552.HK trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7552.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7552.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 7552.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2827.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2827.HK has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2827.HK trades at $36.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2827.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2827.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2827.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3032.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3032.HK has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3032.HK trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3032.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3032.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2833.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2833.HK has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2833.HK trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2833.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2833.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2833.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7500.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7500.HK has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7500.HK trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7500.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7500.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7500.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0806.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0806.HK has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0806.HK trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0806.HK's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0806.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0806.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0245.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0245.HK has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0245.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0245.HK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0245.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0245.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3088.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3088.HK has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3088.HK trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3088.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3088.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3088.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83010.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83010.HK has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83010.HK trades at $54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83010.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83010.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83010.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2801.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2801.HK has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2801.HK trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2801.HK's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2801.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2801.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0133.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0133.HK has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0133.HK trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0133.HK's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0133.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0133.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3081.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3081.HK has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3081.HK trades at $78.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3081.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3081.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3081.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3115.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3115.HK has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3115.HK trades at $86.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3115.HK's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3115.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3115.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2836.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2836.HK has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2836.HK trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2836.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2836.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7568.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7568.HK has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7568.HK trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7568.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7568.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7568.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1697.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1697.HK has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1697.HK trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1697.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1697.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1697.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2845.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2845.HK has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2845.HK trades at $90.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2845.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2845.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2845.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 9096.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 9096.HK has a market cap of 921.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 9096.HK trades at $118.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 9096.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9096.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0905.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0905.HK has a market cap of 871.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0905.HK trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0905.HK's P/E ratio is -20.75. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0905.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0905.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1140.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1140.HK has a market cap of 831.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1140.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1140.HK's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1140.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 1140.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7299.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7299.HK has a market cap of 793.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7299.HK trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7299.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7299.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7299.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3167.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3167.HK has a market cap of 784.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3167.HK trades at $62.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3167.HK's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3167.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3167.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2825.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2825.HK has a market cap of 617.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2825.HK trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2825.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2825.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2825.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3173.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3173.HK has a market cap of 572.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3173.HK trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3173.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3173.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 9011.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 9011.HK has a market cap of 571.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 9011.HK trades at $1,185.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 9011.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9011.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0033.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0033.HK has a market cap of 569.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0033.HK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0033.HK's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0033.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0033.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3086.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3086.HK has a market cap of 558.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3086.HK trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3086.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3086.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3086.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3066.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3066.HK has a market cap of 529.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3066.HK trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3066.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3066.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1973.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1973.HK has a market cap of 518.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1973.HK trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1973.HK's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1973.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1973.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3109.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3109.HK has a market cap of 479.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3109.HK trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3109.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3109.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3109.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2803.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2803.HK has a market cap of 462.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2803.HK trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2803.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2803.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 2803.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0129.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0129.HK has a market cap of 433.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0129.HK trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0129.HK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0129.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0129.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3191.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3191.HK has a market cap of 430.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3191.HK trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3191.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3191.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3191.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1328.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1328.HK has a market cap of 396.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1328.HK trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1328.HK's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1328.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 1328.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0612.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0612.HK has a market cap of 376.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0612.HK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0612.HK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0612.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0612.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1226.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1226.HK has a market cap of 367.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1226.HK trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1226.HK's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1226.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1226.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3175.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3175.HK has a market cap of 339.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3175.HK trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3175.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3175.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7522.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7522.HK has a market cap of 306.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7522.HK trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7522.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7522.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7522.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0721.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0721.HK has a market cap of 296.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0721.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0721.HK's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0721.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0721.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1835.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1835.HK has a market cap of 288.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1835.HK trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1835.HK's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1835.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1835.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0214.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0214.HK has a market cap of 285.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0214.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0214.HK's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0214.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0214.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2846.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2846.HK has a market cap of 282.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2846.HK trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2846.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2846.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2846.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83147.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83147.HK has a market cap of 259.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83147.HK trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83147.HK's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83147.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83147.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3010.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3010.HK has a market cap of 239.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3010.HK trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3010.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3010.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3010.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0575.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0575.HK has a market cap of 233.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0575.HK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0575.HK's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0575.HK's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0575.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7588.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7588.HK has a market cap of 228.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7588.HK trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7588.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7588.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7588.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1062.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1062.HK has a market cap of 188.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1062.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1062.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1062.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1062.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 8657.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 8657.HK has a market cap of 176.19M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 8657.HK trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 8657.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8657.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 8657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3070.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3070.HK has a market cap of 174.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3070.HK trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3070.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3070.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3070.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0292.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0292.HK has a market cap of 161.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0292.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0292.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0292.HK's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0292.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2812.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2812.HK has a market cap of 154.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2812.HK trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2812.HK's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2812.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2812.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83128.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83128.HK has a market cap of 144.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83128.HK trades at $52.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83128.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83128.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 83128.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3091.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3091.HK has a market cap of 130.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3091.HK trades at $103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3091.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3091.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1217.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1217.HK has a market cap of 128.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1217.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1217.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1217.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 1217.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0174.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0174.HK has a market cap of 127.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0174.HK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0174.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0174.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0174.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7300.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7300.HK has a market cap of 122.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7300.HK trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7300.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7300.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7300.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3160.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3160.HK has a market cap of 121.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3160.HK trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3160.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3160.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2838.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2838.HK has a market cap of 120.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2838.HK trades at $163.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2838.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2838.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3071.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3071.HK has a market cap of 115.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3071.HK trades at $1,120.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3071.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3071.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3071.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3165.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3165.HK has a market cap of 115.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3165.HK trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3165.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3165.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3165.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3187.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3187.HK has a market cap of 107.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3187.HK trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3187.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3187.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 8025.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 8025.HK has a market cap of 100.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 8025.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 8025.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8025.HK's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 8025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3141.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3141.HK has a market cap of 95.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3141.HK trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3141.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3141.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3141.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0080.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0080.HK has a market cap of 89.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0080.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0080.HK's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0080.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0080.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0913.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0913.HK has a market cap of 64.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0913.HK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0913.HK's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0913.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3145.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3145.HK has a market cap of 63.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3145.HK trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3145.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3145.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3145.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 9074.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 9074.HK has a market cap of 56.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 9074.HK trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 9074.HK's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9074.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9074.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0204.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0204.HK has a market cap of 52.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0204.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0204.HK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0204.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0204.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0901.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0901.HK has a market cap of 51.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0901.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0901.HK's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0901.HK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0901.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0768.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0768.HK has a market cap of 50.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0768.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0768.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0768.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0768.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83168.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83168.HK has a market cap of 50.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83168.HK trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83168.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83168.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83168.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 1160.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 1160.HK has a market cap of 49.83M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 1160.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 1160.HK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1160.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 1160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3130.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3130.HK has a market cap of 48.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3130.HK trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3130.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3130.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3130.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 3031.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 3031.HK has a market cap of 47.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 3031.HK trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 3031.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3031.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 3031.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 8313.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 8313.HK has a market cap of 40.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 8313.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 8313.HK's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8313.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 8313.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0145.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0145.HK has a market cap of 39.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0145.HK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0145.HK's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0145.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 0145.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 7331.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 7331.HK has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 7331.HK trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 7331.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7331.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 7331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83122.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83122.HK has a market cap of 34.06M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83122.HK trades at $166.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83122.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83122.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83122.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 9810.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 9810.HK has a market cap of 33.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 9810.HK trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 9810.HK's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9810.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 9810.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0339.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0339.HK has a market cap of 33.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0339.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0339.HK's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0339.HK's ROE of -5.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0339.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 83118.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 83118.HK has a market cap of 32.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 83118.HK trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 83118.HK's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 83118.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 83118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 2312.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 2312.HK has a market cap of 29.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 2312.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 2312.HK's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2312.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 2312.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 9091.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 9091.HK has a market cap of 23.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 9091.HK trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 9091.HK's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9091.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is less volatile compared to 9091.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.
1051.HK vs 0810.HK Comparison
1051.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1051.HK stands at 3.92B. In comparison, 0810.HK has a market cap of 23.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 1051.HK is priced at $8.69, while 0810.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1051.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas 0810.HK's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 1051.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0810.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1051.HK is more volatile compared to 0810.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1051.HK.