KNT Holdings Limited
KNT Holdings Limited 1025.HK Peers
See (1025.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1025.HK | HK$0.25 | -1.61% | 49.5M | -0.64 | -HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 2313.HK | HK$56.85 | -0.26% | 85.5B | 12.61 | HK$4.51 | +3.76% |
| 3998.HK | HK$4.53 | +0.89% | 51.9B | 14.16 | HK$0.32 | +5.35% |
| 2232.HK | HK$5.02 | -0.20% | 14.3B | 9.13 | HK$0.55 | +5.34% |
| 2299.HK | HK$4.39 | +2.33% | 9.3B | 11.55 | HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 3306.HK | HK$15.14 | +0.93% | 7.8B | 8.23 | HK$1.84 | +9.43% |
| 1709.HK | HK$3.15 | -0.63% | 4.7B | 45.00 | HK$0.07 | +0.63% |
| 1234.HK | HK$3.63 | +0.83% | 4.3B | 8.64 | HK$0.42 | +9.01% |
| 2698.HK | HK$3.49 | +0.29% | 4.2B | -2.68 | -HK$1.30 | N/A |
| 2678.HK | HK$3.40 | -0.58% | 3.1B | 5.23 | HK$0.65 | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
1025.HK vs 2313.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2313.HK has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2313.HK trades at HK$56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2313.HK's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2313.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2313.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3998.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3998.HK has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3998.HK trades at HK$4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3998.HK's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3998.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 3998.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2232.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2232.HK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2232.HK trades at HK$5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2232.HK's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2232.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2232.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2299.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2299.HK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2299.HK trades at HK$4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2299.HK's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2299.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2299.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3306.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3306.HK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3306.HK trades at HK$15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3306.HK's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3306.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 3306.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1709.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1709.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1709.HK trades at HK$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1709.HK's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1709.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1709.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1234.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1234.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1234.HK trades at HK$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1234.HK's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1234.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1234.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2698.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2698.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2698.HK trades at HK$3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2698.HK's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2698.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2698.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2678.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2678.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2678.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2678.HK's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2678.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2111.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2111.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2111.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2111.HK's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2111.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2111.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3818.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3818.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3818.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3818.HK's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3818.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 3818.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2368.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2368.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2368.HK trades at HK$3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2368.HK's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2368.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2368.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2199.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2199.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2199.HK trades at HK$1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2199.HK's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2199.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2199.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1982.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1982.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1982.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1982.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1982.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1982.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1382.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1382.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1382.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1382.HK's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1382.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1382.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2668.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2668.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2668.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2668.HK's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2668.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1425.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1425.HK has a market cap of 937.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1425.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1425.HK's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1425.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2030.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2030.HK has a market cap of 929.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2030.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2030.HK's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2030.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2030.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0533.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0533.HK has a market cap of 925.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0533.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0533.HK's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0533.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0533.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0321.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0321.HK has a market cap of 870.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0321.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0321.HK's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0321.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0321.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2399.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2399.HK has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2399.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2399.HK's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2399.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2399.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0420.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0420.HK has a market cap of 796.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0420.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0420.HK's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0420.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0420.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0918.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0918.HK has a market cap of 768.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0918.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0918.HK's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0918.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0918.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1346.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1346.HK has a market cap of 747.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1346.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1346.HK's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1346.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1346.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2011.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2011.HK has a market cap of 746.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2011.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2011.HK's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2011.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2011.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0528.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0528.HK has a market cap of 715.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0528.HK trades at HK$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0528.HK's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0528.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0528.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3608.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3608.HK has a market cap of 700.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3608.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3608.HK's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3608.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 3608.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0458.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0458.HK has a market cap of 681.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0458.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0458.HK's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0458.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0458.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8195.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8195.HK has a market cap of 660.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8195.HK trades at HK$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8195.HK's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8195.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 8195.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8107.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8107.HK has a market cap of 604.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8107.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8107.HK's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8107.HK's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8107.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3778.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3778.HK has a market cap of 576.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3778.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3778.HK's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3778.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 3778.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0608.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0608.HK has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0608.HK trades at HK$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0608.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0608.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0608.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1906.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1906.HK has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1906.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1906.HK's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1906.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1906.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2298.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2298.HK has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2298.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2298.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2298.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2298.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1520.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1520.HK has a market cap of 428.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1520.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1520.HK's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1520.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1520.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1795.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1795.HK has a market cap of 402M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1795.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1795.HK's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1795.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1795.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8041.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8041.HK has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8041.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8041.HK's P/E ratio is -239.47. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8041.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8041.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8521.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8521.HK has a market cap of 362.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8521.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8521.HK's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8521.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8521.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1247.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1247.HK has a market cap of 310.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1247.HK trades at HK$1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1247.HK's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1247.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1247.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3322.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3322.HK has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3322.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3322.HK's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3322.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 3322.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0146.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0146.HK has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0146.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0146.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0146.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0146.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1146.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1146.HK has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1146.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1146.HK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1146.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1146.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1532.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1532.HK has a market cap of 214.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1532.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1532.HK's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1532.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1532.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 3398.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 3398.HK has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 3398.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 3398.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 3398.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 3398.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0643.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0643.HK has a market cap of 207M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0643.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0643.HK's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0643.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0643.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0294.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0294.HK has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0294.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0294.HK's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0294.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0294.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8480.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8480.HK has a market cap of 186.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8480.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8480.HK's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8480.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8480.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1388.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1388.HK has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1388.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1388.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1388.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1388.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0311.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0311.HK has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0311.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0311.HK's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0311.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0311.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0707.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0707.HK has a market cap of 160.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0707.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0707.HK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0707.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0707.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1433.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1433.HK has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1433.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1433.HK's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1433.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1433.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8471.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8471.HK has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8471.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8471.HK's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8471.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8471.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1749.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1749.HK has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1749.HK trades at HK$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1749.HK's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1749.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1749.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0844.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0844.HK has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0844.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0844.HK's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0844.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0844.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0122.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0122.HK has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0122.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0122.HK's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0122.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0122.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0036.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0036.HK has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0036.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0036.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0036.HK's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0036.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2307.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2307.HK has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2307.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2307.HK's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2307.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 2307.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0540.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0540.HK has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0540.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0540.HK's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0540.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0540.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1682.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1682.HK has a market cap of 103.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1682.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1682.HK's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1682.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1682.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0518.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0518.HK has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0518.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0518.HK's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0518.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0518.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 2223.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 2223.HK has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 2223.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 2223.HK's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 2223.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 2223.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1400.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1400.HK has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1400.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1400.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1400.HK's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1400.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0333.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0333.HK has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0333.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0333.HK's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0333.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0333.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1968.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1968.HK has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1968.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1968.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1968.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 1968.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8377.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8377.HK has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8377.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8377.HK's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8377.HK's ROE of -20.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8377.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8297.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8297.HK has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8297.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8297.HK's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8297.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8211.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8211.HK has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8211.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8211.HK's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8211.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8211.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0048.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0048.HK has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0048.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0048.HK's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0048.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0048.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0130.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0130.HK has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0130.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0130.HK's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0130.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 0130.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8507.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8507.HK has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8507.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8507.HK's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8507.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 8507.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8607.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8607.HK has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8607.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8607.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8607.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8607.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 1825.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 1825.HK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 1825.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 1825.HK's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 1825.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is more volatile compared to 1825.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 8456.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 8456.HK has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 8456.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 8456.HK's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 8456.HK's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 8456.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0787.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0787.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0787.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0787.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0787.HK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0787.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.
1025.HK vs 0539.HK Comparison
1025.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1025.HK stands at 49.5M. In comparison, 0539.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1025.HK is priced at HK$0.25, while 0539.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1025.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0539.HK's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1025.HK's ROE is -0.48%, compared to 0539.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1025.HK is less volatile compared to 0539.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1025.HK.