Meyka Pro banner
Law and Government

Woolworths Pushes Victoria for Workplace Protection Orders After Baseball Bat Fight

July 22, 2026
01:01 PM
4 min read

Key Points

Baseball bat fight at Kyabram Woolworths on July 20 sent customers and children fleeing.

One of two men charged had been arrested at the same store just 11 days earlier.

Woolworths says banning notices fail to stop repeat offenders and is pushing for workplace protection orders.

Victorian government has signaled support for WPO legislation but Woolworths urges urgent passage across all states.

Sentiment:NEGATIVE (-0.60)
Be the first to rate this article

A baseball bat fight at Woolworths’ Kyabram store on July 20 has triggered calls for tougher workplace laws. Two men, aged 41 and 45, were charged with affray and intentionally causing injury after the violent confrontation near checkouts, with footage showing one striking the other while terrified customers and children fled. One man had been arrested at the same supermarket just 11 days earlier, highlighting what Woolworths says are the limits of existing banning notices.

What happened at the Kyabram store

The incident unfolded at 7 p.m. on July 20 when two men fought near the checkouts. One man struck the other with a baseball bat while customers and children scrambled to safety. A boy ran from the scene as a woman and child climbed over the checkout area to escape. The victim sustained non-life-threatening injuries but declined medical treatment and declined to make a statement to police. No other customers or Woolworths staff were injured.

Why one man was back in the store

One of the two men had been arrested at the same Kyabram Woolworths just 11 days before the baseball bat fight. Local business owner Miles Gould, who witnessed the earlier incident, told A Current Affair the man was “tasered multiple times, upwards of five, and he was pepper sprayed.” Despite being charged and released on bail after that first arrest, the man allegedly returned to the store the following morning after the July 20 fight, even though both men were banned from the premises.

Woolworths’ push for workplace protection orders

Woolworths head of violence prevention Sarah Faorlin said banning notices are not effective when repeat offenders return. The retailer is urging the Victorian government to introduce workplace protection orders as a matter of urgency. These orders would allow courts to prevent repeat offenders from entering certain workplaces. Woolworths welcomed the government’s move to bring in WPO legislation and increased penalties for violence, but called for swift passage of the laws across all states and territories.

Community frustration over bail laws

Miles Gould said residents were frustrated by repeated incidents in the town. “If the bail laws were what they were meant to be and strong, he wouldn’t be out in the community as often as he is,” Gould told A Current Affair. Both men were released on bail and are scheduled to appear at Echuca Magistrates’ Court. Police alleged the two men were known to each other. Opposition MP Jess Wilson blamed “Labor’s weak laws when it comes to crime,” while Labor maintains Victoria’s bail laws are the toughest in the nation.

Final Thoughts

The Kyabram incident exposes gaps in existing workplace protections when repeat offenders face bail conditions. Woolworths’ push for workplace protection orders reflects a broader frustration among retailers and communities over the ability to keep violent individuals away from public spaces.

FAQs

Why did Woolworths call for workplace protection orders?

Banning notices failed to stop one man from returning the day after the baseball bat fight, showing existing tools are ineffective against repeat offenders.

How many times was the man tasered before the baseball bat fight?

Local business owner Miles Gould said the man was tasered upwards of five times during an arrest at the same store 11 days earlier.

Were any customers or staff injured in the Kyabram Woolworths fight?

The victim sustained non-life-threatening injuries but declined medical treatment. No other customers or Woolworths staff were injured.

What charges were laid against the two men?

Both men, aged 41 and 45, were charged with affray and intentionally causing injury. Both were released on bail to appear at Echuca Magistrates’ Court.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

About Author

Author

Danny Kontos

Co Founder

Danny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)