Meyka Pro banner
Global Market Insights

U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Trump’s Mail-In Voting Order Ahead of Midterms

July 28, 2026
01:42 AM
3 min read

Key Points

1st Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's mail-in voting order on July 25 in 2-1 decision.

Order would have created federal voter database and restricted mail ballot delivery to registered voters.

23 Democratic-led states plus D.C. sued, arguing the order violated the Constitution.

Justice Department warned it may ask the Supreme Court to intervene in the case.

Be the first to rate this article

A federal appeals court on July 25 rejected the Trump administration’s request to implement stricter mail-in voting rules in 23 Democratic-led states before November’s midterm elections. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s June 25 injunction blocking key parts of Trump’s March executive order, which would have created a federal voter database and restricted mail ballot delivery to registered voters only.

What Trump’s executive order required

Trump signed the March executive order directing the Department of Homeland Security to create a federal database of eligible voters. It also ordered the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on that list and instructed the Justice Department to intensify investigations into alleged voting violations. The order applied to federal elections, though states administer them under the U.S. Constitution.

Why the court blocked it

The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 on July 25 that the order likely violated the Constitution. The judges wrote that states had no practical choice but to respond immediately because the order set rapidly approaching deadlines for September and November elections. The Justice Department had argued the lawsuit was premature since agencies had not finalized implementation details, but the court rejected that reasoning.

Which states sued and why

California, Massachusetts, Nevada, Washington, and 19 other Democratic-led states plus the District of Columbia challenged the order. State election officials argued the changes were unconstitutional because states and Congress, not the president, set election rules. They also warned the restrictions could cause chaos and were ripe for abuse.

What happens next

The Justice Department said it is reviewing all options and warned it may ask the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. The ruling applies only to the 23 states that sued and does not resolve the underlying legal dispute. For Canadian investors watching U.S. policy shifts, this ruling signals continued legal uncertainty around election administration heading into the midterms, which will determine control of Congress.

Final Thoughts

The appeals court decision blocks Trump’s mail-in voting restrictions in 23 states through the November midterms, but the Justice Department may escalate to the Supreme Court. The ruling underscores how election rules remain contested territory in U.S. politics.

FAQs

Why did Trump’s executive order restrict mail-in voting?

Trump claimed the restrictions were safeguards to prevent non-U.S. citizens from voting. He has pushed for tighter mail voting rules for years and falsely claimed widespread voter fraud cost him the 2020 election.

Does this ruling block the order everywhere in the U.S.?

No. The injunction applies only to the 23 Democratic-led states and Washington D.C. that sued. Other states could still be affected if the Supreme Court later rules differently.

When will the Supreme Court decide this case?

The Justice Department has not yet filed a request with the Supreme Court. No timeline has been set for any high court review.

Can states ignore the ruling and enforce mail-in voting limits anyway?

No. States that are party to the lawsuit must follow the court’s injunction. Violating it could result in contempt of court charges against state officials.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

About Author

Author

Danny Kontos

Co Founder

Danny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)