Key Points
52,000 graduates responded to Treasury Committee inquiry on student loans.
92% said interest rates and repayment terms were not reasonable.
Salary threshold frozen at £29,385 until 2030, not rising with inflation.
Government capped interest at 6% but campaigners call for wider reforms.
A parliamentary inquiry into UK student loans has exposed widespread confusion and anger among graduates. More than 52,000 people responded to the Treasury Committee’s call for evidence, with over half saying they did not understand their loan terms before signing up. The findings reveal a systemic problem with how Plan 2 loans were explained to students, particularly regarding repayment thresholds and interest rates.
What the Survey Revealed
The Treasury Committee received one of the highest response rates ever recorded for a select committee inquiry. Of 49,357 respondents with student loans, 92% said interest rates and repayment terms were not reasonable. Additionally, 81% reported the financial impact was worse than expected, and 28,275 people said they did not understand the terms before taking out their loans.
One respondent described repayments as a tax on ambition. Another said they were told the loan would be less than a phone bill and barely noticeable, but now pay hundreds of pounds monthly. The scale of dissatisfaction prompted Treasury Committee chair Dame Meg Hillier to describe the situation as showing a massive scale and strength of frustration and upset.
The Frozen Salary Threshold Problem
Plan 2 loans, issued in England between September 2012 and July 2023, require graduates to repay 9% of earnings above a salary threshold. The government froze this threshold at £29,385 until 2030, rather than allowing it to rise with inflation as originally promised.
This freeze means graduates earning above the threshold will pay a larger proportion of their salary toward loans as their wages increase. The Department for Education originally told prospective students that thresholds would adjust annually in line with average earnings. The retrospective change was legal but graduates were not fully informed this could happen when they took out their loans.
Government Response and Interest Rate Cap
The Department for Education said it understood graduate concerns and has taken steps to make the system fairer. In April, the government capped interest on some student loans at 6% in the next academic year to protect against rising inflation.
However, campaigners have welcomed this measure but called for wider reforms. The National Union of Students said the survey data showed how damning the situation is. Of the 49,357 respondents with loans, 25,291 said they would not take out their loan again if given the choice.
Impact on Financial Planning
The loan repayments have material consequences for graduates’ lives. Of those surveyed, 34,555 said repayments had a material impact on their financial planning for the future. Additionally, 40,373 respondents said the combined financial impact of repaying their loan and paying tax was worse than they expected.
The Treasury Committee’s first evidence session is scheduled for 2 June. Witnesses will include representatives from Universities UK, the National Union of Students, and Sir Philip Augar, who authored a 2019 review into student loans.
Final Thoughts
The inquiry reveals a fundamental breakdown in how Plan 2 loans were communicated to students. With 92% calling terms unreasonable and the salary threshold frozen until 2030, graduates face higher real repayments than promised. Wider system reform is now inevitable.
FAQs
Plan 2 loans issued in England from September 2012 to July 2023 require graduates to repay 9% of earnings above a £29,385 salary threshold, frozen until 2030.
The government promised the threshold would rise with inflation. Freezing it until 2030 means graduates earning more repay a larger percentage of salary than originally expected.
Over 52,000 people responded, representing one of the highest response rates for a parliamentary select committee inquiry and unprecedented public engagement.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Danny Kontos
Co FounderDanny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)