Key Points
State Department exploring $100,000 refundable bond for overseas green card applicants.
Bond amount would vary based on applicant finances and perceived public charge risk.
Money refundable only after applicant becomes U.S. citizen, typically five years minimum.
Proposal expands pilot program that started August 2025 for tourist visas in 50 countries.
The Trump administration is considering requiring some green card applicants to post a refundable bond of up to $100,000 before receiving an immigrant visa through U.S. consulates abroad. State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott confirmed the proposal is under discussion as part of efforts to ensure new immigrants are financially self-sufficient. The bond amount could vary based on applicant finances, immigration category, family circumstances, or perceived risk of relying on public assistance.
How the bond would work
Applicants applying for immigrant visas at U.S. consulates would need to deposit the bond before receiving their green card. The money would be refundable, but only after the applicant becomes a U.S. citizen, a process that typically takes at least five years. Family members could post the bond on an applicant’s behalf, meaning a family sponsoring two adults could potentially need access to $200,000 if both received the highest bond amount. The administration has not clarified whether applicants could use commercial bond companies, property, securities, or other assets instead of cash, or whether the government would pay interest on money held for several years.
Expansion of an existing pilot program
The proposal builds on a pilot program for tourist visas that began in August 2025. Initially, applicants from Malawi and Zambia were required to post a refundable bond of up to $15,000, forfeited if they overstayed the visa or applied for asylum after arriving. The program has since expanded to 50 countries, more than half in Africa. The State Department plans to test the green card bond initiative in a limited number of countries, though the exact list has not been disclosed.
Critics warn of wealth barrier to legal immigration
Immigration advocates argue the proposal creates a pay-for-play system that favors wealthy applicants. Sharvari Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association told the Wall Street Journal that the goal of bonds is to keep out a certain type of immigrant. Local immigration attorney Drucker said the proposal effectively creates a wealth test for legal immigration. Many qualified immigrants who followed the legal process lack access to $100,000, making permanent residency unattainable for countless lower-income families. Drucker expects the proposal, if finalized, to generate legal challenges and raise questions about whether financial status should determine access to lawful permanent residence.
Timing and outstanding questions
The proposal emerged hours after the Trump administration revived the public charge rule, which can deny green cards to immigrants who use public benefits such as food stamps, Medicaid, and housing vouchers. No final policy has been announced, and the bond is not currently required. Key details remain unresolved, including which applicants would face the bond, how officials would set amounts in individual cases, what conditions would trigger repayment, and how long the federal government could hold the money.
Final Thoughts
The $100,000 bond proposal represents a significant shift in legal immigration policy by introducing a financial threshold for permanent residency. If implemented, the policy would likely face legal challenges while reshaping who can afford to immigrate legally to the United States.
FAQs
Up to $100,000, though the amount could vary based on the applicant’s financial position, immigration category, family circumstances, or perceived risk of relying on public assistance.
The money would be refundable only after the applicant becomes a U.S. citizen, a process that typically takes at least five years.
Yes, relatives could be allowed to provide the money on behalf of an applicant, though this does not remove the financial barrier.
No. The proposal is still under discussion at the State Department. No final policy has been announced, and the bond is not currently required.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Huzaifa Zahoor
Co FounderHuzaifa Zahoor is the engineer who built Meyka. He has spent years writing Python, training AI models, and building data pipelines specifically for financial markets. His technical articles have reached over 30,000 readers on Medium, so he knows how to make complex things easy to follow. If this article touches on how the tools work, he is the person who actually built them.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)